(0616) Morning all. Dull out there, warm. Quick q … how’s Steve? Andy? The other chaps? I already know about Isilme … she’s snowed under. (0744)

 

5. Unsung warriors

… look at how many likes, compared to the other lady. Where are all the boys? Off following football or just around, approving. Or being feminised by evil women in homes and schools, themselves ruined by the fabians.

This is my original pic of her, much younger:

Pretty clear which faith and politics. I’ve been challenged on being too soft on the ladies … there’s definitely truth in that … but I ask you your opinion on this one above. Only one like? Guess where my loyalty is.

4. Bindel

Bindel is a known known … Donna-Louise is one of us … now Restore, she was posting and reposting the rape gang report in X. I trust her at this point.

3. There is no way around this

They do right … and yet … normies do not read 142 page documents and vote for someone for proper reasons:

2. DAD at 1442

Friday. [The children have been playing – again. We are back to the old cookie sign-in.]

a) Toulouse: a father struck a man who had sexually assaulted his five-year-old child in a park. The assailant, who does not speak French, was hospitalised.

b) France will not advance to the Football World Cup final. After losing 2–0

c) The Lyhanna case–the rape and murder of an eleven-year-old girl by a man against whom several complaints of rape had been lodged prior to the tragedy, none of which had ever been investigated….

d) EU Prosecutor found guilty of Misconduct escapes dismissal.

e) Glasgow on Edge: What’s Actually Happening in Gorbals & Govan? Glasgow explodes; nobody is listening.

JH: I’m only going to repeat … our chaps (and occasional droppers) are needed, badly needed, appreciated. We have no idea what snippets are going to slip through. Also … read Andy properly. Only occasional but worth it.

1. As succinct a summary as I can make this

a. Last night, late, still unable to sleep (which did arrive later), I went through material at NOWP and realised just how important our chaps are here. I would never had seen or heard those things. Part I address in b beliw. One thing crystal clear is we’re too busy to take time to look, read, hear. I admonish normies for being too rushed. I too should take allicated time for the reading. Plus appreciating good friends, real ones who care.

b. AW, Farage, estab … a conundrum they dearly desire. In short, people, esp. on “our side”, are at odds because of:

(i) Failure to do due diligence and take onboard that which does not accord with our a priori bias. Holmes was at pains to say that he too would take in a conclusion, but he had been meant to do just that by the baddy. Failure to take on that last 20% is crucial in wrong conclusions … open mind is such a difficult thing for an investigator.

(ii) If it semems there is a plethora of clashing scenarios … that is no accident. One disingenuous lot is one thing … but what if both or more are disingenuous, all pulling the wool?

This is especially so with Farage and AW. The thing in my mind was that Farage is just as disingenous, uses people to defend him, himself and now he sees one lit within the estab gunning for him in a far more real way than the game he is himself playing with Uni plus three letter. He himself is on the puppet strings as controlled opp … yet he also seems genuinely gunned for. That would fool any normie who does not think it through. Hell, it fools us too. Let’s say nonplussed.

(iii) You must, if investigating, be supercareful of distractions playing on weaknesses. I really loved Daniella Bianchi in FRWL. She turned out genuine in her own loyal way. In the last two days, ladies I call A and C have reappeared and it’s been eyeopening. Plus I am coming up to a time which could well be terminal for my online activity … you read that right. Readers, be aware if I suddenly stop, though I am not referring to AW type but rather the bureaucrats cutting me off.

(iv) You chaps and chapesses cannot remain complacent in your passive “receiving of news”, inc. our own sites here. Kudos for at least finding out but do think through sources … just who are they? What background, beholden to whom? For example, Todd Blanche. There is way too much disingenuity about.

(v) Mixing in a few items … do not break cover which you have carefully set up, for an ideal. Do you remember John Connor admitting he opened the door to the Terminator, once again a Terminator? Check out neural pathways if you have time. Follow set procedures you yourself put in place. One slip is like a cricket batsmen making even one wrong shot. Do not assume a “closed” person is either for or against but keep laying intel on the tavern table, with sources. And delve into sources. In our Other section in navbar, we have spent time, esp. IYE, warning about these.

(vi) Coming back to anomalies like AW and Farage … why are there anomalies? Coz someone in the mix us not being true. Remember me calling it the Sgt Holcombe effect? Seeing anomalous detail and “ignoring it”, even shelving it? Anomalies mean someone is putting on an act.

(vii) Protect your people at all times. Failure to do so by playing favourites leaves all proteges who trusted you to start feeling uneasy. I’m going to do a post item, no more expanded than that, on a character called Julia (not ours). This includes mothers and fathers who spend inordinate amounts of time on the child with the greatest probs … what about your other chn?