Second of the Lucille Vines episodes, last of the Ronald Howard Holmes for now (hiatus only).
Second of the Lucille Vines episodes, last of the Ronald Howard Holmes for now (hiatus only).
(0821) Morning all, 8/8 poisoned cloud cover. Though I’ve been up since 0530, that time was taken by domestic chores, hunting and gathering … and that first coffee and super-cookie.
Plus one more thing, apart from initial correspondence … on Tue, Thur, Sat, Sun, I post at OoL and Jstack … no big deal, except that GglBlgr don’t let me upload and Jstack prevents vid/sound media. Thus I need to first post here, then copy and paste at t’other places.
It occurred to this ageing, weary brain of mine, finally, that it was overkill to also run that post of the day at HQ … so I had to decide first what to put over there and load it from a backpage here. The PotDay is up now at those two places.
Thus I’m later to HQ and NOWP than usual … sorry me but it makes things clearer at this end to redact this way.
5. We’ve covered this a few times

4. Steve at 1483
3. Alberta
Just been discussing it with Sarah:


2. DAD at 1483
JH: The reason I’m disinclined to consign DAD and Steve to first post of the day is that it is usually lost in the queue, right down there at the foot of the day … better to use first post for the day’s n2 topic (the n1 topic being at OoL and Jstack). This is the obvious position, here, for the DAD drop, with Steve a bit later in a prominent position too.
a) Germany. Sahra Wagenknecht’s BSW implodes in Thuringia as MPs abandon party. Ten of the 12 remaining Bündnis Sahra Wagenknecht [BSW] members of the Thuringian parliament announced on Friday that they were leaving the party.
b) Portugal’s largest unsubsidised solar park enters insolvency. The business model has become increasingly challenging as solar generation has expanded rapidly across the Iberian electricity market.
c) Trump contradicts Merz government on Leipzig drone discovery: “I know Putin very well” Trump rejected claims that Putin plans to attack NATO territory, creating a rift with German Chancellor Merz over a drone incident at Leipzig/Halle Airport that Germany blamed on Russia.
d) Birmingham council tore down British flags, branding them “divisive,” and sought a court injunction to stop residents putting them back up. The Patriots reply? They put them straight back up.
1. Heck of a lot of to and fro over Dover over the past 24 hours




Obvious question, in the light of the protest suppression and the FEMA style camp prep (see OoL or Jstack) … obvious question is does the Danny Tommo method work?
I’d say initially but eventually, it is forced into a French Resistance WW2 style, highly dangerous for those loyal to the old Britain they once knew. Plus treachery everywhere, wormtongues. When I was in Russia, there were still vestiges of neighbour suspicion … who was going to denounce you?
This placed huge pressure on the necessity for the extended family to work well. Here in the west of course, the family is almost destroyed … just look at those Clancy clowns, the feminazi brainwashing of young females, the woke HR culture of older females, plus hoe culture, early. Plus the sectors among men as well.
(1712) Back from some downtime, evening all.
22. Dover today


Steve:
“Stop the boats” protestors shut down the Port of Dover | https://expose-news.com/2026/09/05/stop-the-boats-protestors-shut-down-the-port-of-dover/
21. How on earth can one minor judge
… determine national policy and suddenly implement it over the President? Why does POTUS just have her arrested?

20. Brit fodder to the Ukrainian mangler

19. Moo revisited

18. From IYE
| https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/howard-lutnick
ISLAND VISIT (CONFIRMED UNDER OATH): A December 2012 email chain documents planning for a visit to Epstein’s island. Lutnick personally emailed Epstein asking for GPS coordinates so his yacht captain could navigate to Little Saint James. Epstein’s staff scheduled lunch on ‘JE’s island’ for December 22 or 23, with Allison Lutnick copied on correspondence. At a Senate hearing in early 2026, Lutnick confirmed the visit under oath, stating it lasted “about an hour for lunch” and that he was accompanied by his wife, another couple, and their children. Epstein’s assistant confirmed the visit in records reviewed by investigators. A photograph showing Lutnick on the island was briefly removed from DOJ files before being restored.
JH: This is another example of not facing up to facts for many people. I fully accept it takes time, it needs sufficient corroborating or complementing data … but inevitably, one must face the reality. Same with Bannon. There were even photos of Roberts, Obama. Some are accepted more readily, e.g. Hanks, Oprah. Almost everyone has now accepted, in a different way, sbout Blair.
And Bannon:
| https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/steve-bannon
The relationship between former White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein is documented across hundreds of emails, iMessage exchanges, flight records, and meeting coordination documents within the Epstein case files. The earliest documented connection dates to November 18, 2016 ; just days after Trump’s election ; when Epstein associate Alain Forget forwarded Bannon’s 2014 Vatican speech to Epstein (d-17568). That same day, Epstein emailed associate Richard Kahn suggesting Bannon ‘talk privately with jeffrey,’ pitching himself as knowing ‘more about intl finance than anyone on trumps team’ (efta-02669769).
17. Something Alex M from downunder said
She went to a “nationalist” meeting as she called it and did not like what she heard. She is for one Nation there, which seems to me a bit like Marine Le Pen’s lot. My observation is that women are much softer in the evil they tolerate … and then we get Kobie or Marion Mariechal in France, plus quite a few here such as Katie who are much less tolerant if evil, such as killing one’s children … it overrides any issues the mother was having … doesn’t negate them, just occupies a higher place in the psyche.
But Alex used the word N*zi for these One Nation people she dislikes. She is for the party but not for what she sees as far right. She seems more Brit Reform than Brit Restore. Then she says she wants it back as it was in the 60s/70s. Well how on earth can she achieve that with all the invaders threatening the whole nation? The badly behaved places out there need banning, do they not?
What she didn’t like was that this meeting saw speeches like “Australia for Australians”.
And what?
So, despite all the keyboard rhetoric, she would not support the notion that certain ethnicities have shown themselves to be bad news, behaviour wise … but also the sheer legions of other ethnicities piling in now are a different kind of replacement problem. And then there’s medicine and certain conditions which are imported too.
And many women cannot bring themselves to face reality. Plus weak men. So what’s new? I did not see her as one of that latter lot.
(1359) Afternoon all. DAD has a video of Dover up at 1482:10 … interesting things happening. (1421)
16. Steve on mationalism and globalism
Gingrich – Marco’s name keeps coming up and for very good reason..
15. The Clancy procedure

14. Was mulling whether to run this or not

My view on “compliments” is that they are only that if insincere or to gain something … otherwise, they’re just statements of fact. The cynical might see it as “charm assault”, yes … but if it’s something that comes into the head, then I say … say it. You mean it … so say it.
13. Encampments springing up everywhere

12. Is Hitchens wilfully blind
… or just obtuse?

11. DHS findings

An issue arose with this film … it’s not the advertised film. Commenters took umbrage at this but one commenter mentioned that the tube of ewe was the one forcing these strategies on uploaders … it’s all beyond me.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Street_of_Chance_(1942_film)
Remember that the Wiki review is full of spoilers.
(1015)(1015)
10. Being quite “inconsistent” now
… as a result of new things turning up all the time which I attempt to incorporate, plus adjusting one’s view in the light of that … here’s Leah’s summary of the situation:

She’s down specifically on Lutnik right now.
9. Moo corner

8. Marcia Willcox
“When I was 20 years old, I married a 35 year-old man. The first 10 years were wonderful. Eventually, though, I suppose the novelty of my being a young woman wore off. Also, we had kids, and that drew some of the attention away from him. As far as I know, we were faithful to each other, but he just sort of lost interest, and I started chafing because he was acting like an old man at the age of 45. The marriage lasted total of 15 years, then we got divorced. The age difference, which hadn’t mattered much at all in the first 10 years, gradually became significant.
He had married someone who looked like a teenager and was beautiful. But, like all human beings, I aged. I did not get fat or anything and I was still pretty, I just wasn’t as young as I used to be.
As for him, he was sort of always an old man in a young man’s body. He looked older, but most importantly, he acted old. I’ve never been one to care about looks. In fact, I’ve only had one partner in my life that was actually good looking according to western standards. But this guy was only 45 and was acting geriatric. He was a fuddy duddy, didn’t like to go out or have any fun, was grumpy, he acted like a rest home candidate.
So in the end, the age difference did become significant. I don’t know if this will happen in every romance with a significant age gap, but I would urge caution. If you’re asking this question, it could be that you already have doubts. I would carefully consider your next move if I were you.”
Having been in the position of older plus younger at various times (my parents, at 8 years difference were perhaps the limit but there’s was also ethnic … Yorkshire as against Irish) … I’m no stranger to “hetero-ethnic” nor “hetero-age” but only twice “non-western”.
I’ve seen a photo of Marcia, who was on Quora and I’m wondering at hubby’s going off with a young filly (too many men’s folly, as is the cougar and toyboy syndrome). She was fairly straight afa I can see, maybe just as domestically conventional as he was but as she wished more and more for “fun”, excitement, maybe constant travel … well it’s a conjecture.
I do know, right now, a young lady ten years my junior who is into constant travel, almost maniacally so … oh, did I say “a”? I meant two … the first I’ve known since she was zero years old, the other was one year younger in our first summer teenage romance … and we’re still corresponding.
The first broke up with decades long hubby, precisely because he wanted rest, repose, near the end of a working life, which was diametrically opposite to what she wants.
Hmmmmm.
(0945) Morning all … overcast out there, looks poisonous. Years back, we might have called it foreboding or forbidding. (0945)
7. Steve at 1482
6. More on “Nige” and gang, plus some devotees





By my reckoning, we’ve had the first three Holmeses of this series. Today, below, we have my fave episode for Lucille Vines reasons … and tomorrow we have the other with her as a secretary … The Jolly Hangman. Here she does her Texas impersonation, though she’s a Connecticut gal.
(0444) DAD’s coming up after a second snooze in a few mins. (0445) Second sleep. (0759) Steve’s will be item 7 (in the next polit post, ok, at 0945). (0821)
5. I know of at least one other in MA who is against it

4. DAD at 1482
a) France. ‘A frenzy of violence beyond comprehension’ – couple charged with torturing man to death on Snapchat livestream. (JH: There’ll be a post item later on what can be put at Unherdables)
b) Austria’s government is beginning work on a proposal to constitutionally ban “political malsi,”….
c) As Morocco has once again laid claim to the Spanish enclave, and Sánchez is trying to contain tensions with Rabat, the U.S. president lashed out at the Madrid government in an interview.
d) Meta disables Albanian protest accounts as MEPs demand answers. Opposition figures, activists and journalists covering the anti-government “Flamingo Revolution” lost access to Instagram as Albania negotiates European Union membership. (JH: Albania … EU? Sheesh!)
e) The European Union’s Economic Model has officially come to an end. ‘On 27 August in Paris, at the annual conference of the French business federation (La REF 2026), the President of the European Commission delivered a somewhat surprising speech….
3. Gingrich
Erick Erickson makes an important point. Some of the Trump administration’s biggest victories are happening quietly. Marco Rubio is using economic pressure to weaken Cuba’s ability to export revolution. Tom Homan and ICE are producing record results. Competence matters. Results matter. And the quiet men are winning. | https://ewerickson.substack.com/p/the-quiet-men-are-winning

(0254)(0359)
2. More following the Clancy trial
I (JH) have been puzzled about the depth of feeling on both sides of the Clancy trial … what, to me, seemed an open and shut case of murder (and there appears no doubt she did the murders, with malice aforethought) … I wonder if the case against the drugs administered to her counts.
First look at Alec Zeck’s analysis below, on X:
“These drugs don’t just fail to fix people. They mask symptoms, manufacture new ones, and in some cases push people toward harming themselves or someone else—and the industry that profits from them has spent decades making sure the general public doesn’t fully grasp how often that happens. They rip people apart psychologically and physically. They rip families apart, too.
I’m not on “team Lindsay” or “team Patrick,” and I don’t know what happened in that house. But the medication piece keeps getting drowned out by true crime theorizing.
In the 4 months before the killings, Clancy was pumped through 13 different psychiatric medications, with over 30 total prescriptions as doses got yanked up, down, and swapped, by multiple providers who never once compared notes with each other.
The publicly available data backs this up, and they’re not “fringe” in any sense:
The FDA’s own 2006 review of 372 antidepressant trials (nearly 100,000 people) found a 2.3x jump in suicidality risk for patients under 25. That’s why every antidepressant in America now carries a black box warning.
A 2015 Swedish national study found SSRI users aged 15-24 were convicted of violent crimes at more than 5x the rate of non users (3.3% vs 0.6%). Sertraline in particular stood out among the top-prescribed SSRIs.
Roughly 1 in 4 American women is currently on some form of psychiatric medication, per the CDC’s own newest data, nearly double the rate for men. This isn’t a fringe issue at all. It’s mainstream medicine, quietly, on a massive scale.
And the problems with rapid switching or cold stopping these drugs, exactly what happened to Clancy, isn’t a fringe theory:
Antidepressant discontinuation syndrome is very real and can, at a minimum, trigger brain zaps, insomnia, anxiety, and suicidal ideation within days of stopping.
Benzodiazepine withdrawal is one of the most dangerous withdrawal syndromes in all of medicine, capable of triggering, at a minimum, rebound psychosis, seizures, and severe agitation. I watched that happen to my own mother.
Cross tapering (stopping one drug abruptly while starting another) can stack withdrawal from the first on top of side effects from the second, leaving a person destabilized from both directions at once.
According to the medical system’s own ideas, psychiatric medications typically take 4-6 weeks just to reach full effect, and many require slow, deliberate tapering over weeks specifically to avoid destabilizing the nervous system.
Going through 13 drugs in that same window means many of them never had time to even show whether they were “working” (which is a loaded, problematic idea, in and of itself…) before being swapped again.
13 different medications in 4 months is not normal, cautious psychiatric care, or at least it shouldn’t be. But it probably is relatively normal. And that’s the problem: it’s pure pharmacological, psychological chaos, and nobody bats an eye because this is just how the system runs…”
And then look at who he is:


That’s ggl search, which portrays him in the way you see. What we, the officially unqualified public, see is two seemingly opposed and evidence backed cases and yet I’d suggest they’re two separate issues, each to campaign for. This Alec Zeck does not deny she killed the children … his field is “holistic” medicine. Ours so far has been to support the holdout juror and examine woke left women, their reliability, esp. if medical establishment medicated over a long period.
There’s a side issue for Unherdables
Regulars know that “our” Fido took umbrage at my questioning of Leah’s transparency or opacity, without actually negating what she said. I have subsequently run her and shall again. Was I wrong to delve, to look at who she is, also Data Republican?
Difficult to remove the emotion on clearly emotional issues and yet we do need to explore, I’d suggest, if only to clear the person. Zeck may well be fine, he may be a kook … there’s a long history of “unusual” people exposing things.
Take Dr. Colin Ross who exposed the psychiatric “establishment” … Syd Gottlieb, Jolyon West, the whole DID, dissociation techniques, GH Estabrooks, Ewen Cameron, Selwyn Leeks story, even Manchurians. That alone puts us who have looked at it out on the fringe of those “out there”, “out to lunch, mentally” according to powerful forces. For the crime of exploring and trying to examine both sides.
Could I both agree with Alec Zeck and with the “holdout” juror? Why not? But where does that leave that trial? In what state of play?
1. Folic acid … 2005 study in Norway
https://www.uib.no/nye-doktorgrader/170370/bruk-av-høydose-folsyre-i-svangerskapet-og-risiko-kreft
Dr. Clare Craig has a petition over this:
