(1129) Just had a nice salmon and chips. Certainly holding up better but can feel the damage. Ho hum. (1139)
15. Melania is quite vulnerable
14. Moo corner
13. Sad situation … heart
12. NHS managers, inc. DEIs
11. Same sort of theme as earlier
We can only rerun them … oh … once a year? The modern ones I tried some years back … awful, from the acting to the wokery.
However, even the old showed signs in two ways … first of all, she had to be dashing, with a man’s name, e.g. Steve, which also covers the gay lobby but the male has to be almost dismissive of the woman’s capabilities … and I don’t like either thematic elements … tales with each doing what each is capable of are more fun to me, with respect for the other’s abilities and not claiming that they, each, can do what the other does … awkward wording.
Yes, it’s true that they cover that too where Temple “concedes”, finally, that his wife had “done well”. Too patronising for mine, just as I can’t stand modern feminazis. I want them as a team, the man and woman, esp. in this day and age.
Having said all that, the Temple tales are about as good as we can get, composition-wise … new challenge, new face, every so often. They really do it well and yesterday and the day before, those radio plays eased the eyes wonderfully. Thus, maybe, we need a small stock of them at hand. I’m thinking one more after this one … Conrad? Geneva? Experts please opine on the matter.
Here’s this radio play today, later a Tue Mat.
(0810) And so Tuesday moves from 1st to 2nd gear. (0855)
10. Too early in the morning for this?
9. Moo corner
Save the Sherbert Vendors!
8. Which demographic is referred to here?
7. At Longrider’s
On the silly bint who “freed” a lobster
“These animals were in a heated tank and this woman threw one of them into the cold water of the harbour. Her staggering ignorance, which seems to be all too typical of animal rights activists means that both animals are now dead one certainly as a direct cause of her actions and the other possibly related.
She picked this creature out of its tank and threw it overarm into the harbour. Think about that for a moment. There wasn’t one thought there about the welfare of the animal, only her stupid, ignorant cause.”
6. Steve from comments
There’s a health warning attached to this:
(0557) Evenly light grey out in the poisoned sky this morning. Health not fabulous. (0713)
5. Have a good day, y’all
4. Steve at 1366
3. Donny’s learning
2. DAD at 1366
Pre-a) The UK ‘mainstream’ media are stubbornly silent today on the commencement of the trial of three men on trial for arsonists attacks on property belonging to Keir Starmer.
a) In Toulouse, the Bellefontaine neighborhood is gripped by tension following the establishment of a clandestine checkpoint attributed to drug traffickers. For several weeks, motorists traveling on Chemin de Lestang have reportedly been stopped in the middle of the night, searched, and interrogated at gunpoint….
b) The town of Ecquevilly (Yvelines) experienced two nights of intense unrest following a collision between a motocross bike and a police vehicle on April 25. Since the accident, the situation has remained volatile in this town of 4,300 inhabitants, marked by urban violence and a significant police presence….
c) On the night of Thursday, April 23, several criminals broke into the home of an 85-year-old man from Seyssuel, France. Awakened by the noise, the octogenarian was punched in the face before being locked in one of the rooms of his home….
d) Paris: Forced off the metro by a gang, a young man was attacked with a machete and left with a slashed face in the Oberkampf district….
1. There are a number of repeated actions
… I’ve been doing lately which must have created the situation of the heart scare (still present) plus what Them are doing, from meds to poisoned air to too sedentary a blogging lifestyle. The only way to know is to test one link at a time … last night was not taking the statin … today’s is not eating butter on Ritz crackers, plus switching from coffee to tea … it’s going to take some time.
Meanwhile, I just posted at X:
“Under the heading “It’s difficult to free fools from the chains they revere”, a post at two sites quotes five screenshots … these quotes are now reposted on X. Have a lovely Tuesday, dear Xers.”
One place you could read it is at Orphans, another (in large print) is at Jstack. Have a good Tuesday, folks. I’d put my own health currently at 4/10, meaning that at least there’ll be posting … ever so slowly.
(1452) Not quite evening all.
20. Housekeeping again
Not great here but have found two things help … moving about doing jobs, plus listening to Paul Temple. However, back here with pad … it starts again, in lurgy throat, ears, eyes. Just wondering. Have read IYE and Steve but really out of steam now. It might have to be tomorrow a.m. At least everyone can get to read it.
19. I’m going to take one of Steve’s on the WHCD
This bit:
“You can tell a lot about a man about how they instinctively respond when it hits the fan. In this photo, Stephen Miller moves on top of his pregnant wife to protect her. Pete Hegseth stands over his wife, surveying the scene while leaning over, protecting her.”
I was discussing it and I can see both reactions. Whilst a man with family is going to defend that family, but what if they’re not there at the dinner, none of them? What if you’re the sole invitee from your family there? And what if you hit the floor under the table in order to ensure your family continues to have a father?
Ok … what about a man now without any family any more and he’s at the dinner, sitting with a charming lady beside him? The answer is that such a man, esp. at this age … we all have to go sometime … may well dive across that lady to take the bullet for her.
Why? He’s not married to her, she’s not family. The answer again is that if he dies, it’s with a Sydney Carton posthumous name … a far, far better thing than he’d done up to this point.
A detractor points out, “Nobody’s ever going to remember you … you’re a nobody.”
True … it’s not for any sort of public name but only for those few people he counts as friends … that’s all. It’s for them. He feels he can exit with dignity.
“But who’s to say you’ll be killed? What if you’re now a quadraplegic for another decade?”
“So?”
OK … let’s buy that the whole thing was a set up, kabuki theatre, all knew their parts. Uh huh. I still say that if it changes at least some women’s minds about the sexes, that’s a good thing. If it inspires men.
18. The WHCD
17. USAID
16. Housekeeping
It was always going to be the case that as long as we had it that we’d countenance no Wokery here, no globopsycho narrative … then the max fallout would be loss of posts or even blogs by platforms’ heavyhanded pretence that the real truth on an issue was “misinformation”, whilst Wokery and demonic psycho was somehow “community standards”.
We could live with that. This blog is neither Israeli nor Malsi … it’s the West as we once knew it and we want it back, with the focus on each of our nations. Things on, say, Israel and Malsi, would be different angles, occasionally posted and disagreed upon.
However, the worst thing for this site would be if someone was so fixated on “Jews bad” and another main author was “cut them some slack, they’re not too bad”, Malsi is the issue … and that then becomes a middle-east war here, right on our pages, whilst our own countries take a back seat.
This is not the time for the site moderator to suddenly have heart issues, as he struggles to be moderate. So Sod’s Law says this is precisely when he will have heart issues. None of which solves the Jewish-Malsi imperialism … if that could be solved by western nations, then it would have been. And both those interlopers know that fullwell.
Both those sides, played like violins by globopsycho, get everyone at each other’s throats, the intemperate language starts, then the rest of it. I am not by any means saying don’t post, let’s all love one another and hug trees … I’m saying we must not lose sight of being played … not just by the hated Jew but also the hated jihadi or the WEFer or Chinaman or Russki … their ultimate aim, all of em, is OUR division and destruction and we let them play us, rather than refuse to.
This is a strategic question. Did Net the Yahoo switch off the iron dome, leading to what happened? Yes. Did jihadis load women into cages and burn them? Yes. Do Sinatsikap pack rape women and girls? Yes. Let it go? No. But don’t ONLY see one group to target … they’re ALLat it, inc. our pollies. There’s no zero sum in this.
Having said all that, I’m about to start my own caustic comment on various matters.
(1046) Greetings late morning … typical Monday, wash and delivery, housework, cooking day, with one added extra … not well again. Fine this morning, then usual routines … one of them has set me back … but which one? A bit of self-diagnosis needed. Eased by the up and downstairs exercise. Oh well. (1108)
15. Going to see if I can find this film
14. Moo corner
13. Nice
12. Try this one
11. The acoustics as the dealbreaker
Just in case we run out you know. This one’s rated middling, from the later era before it went silly … many reviews consider it one of the best.
(0715) Morning all. Awful day out there, total poisoned cloud cover. Have a week of survival. (0714)
10. Titania reappears out of nowhere
Which beast is nearest you, if within these shores?
9. Moo corner
8. Leftwing academics are the issue
Plus I’d add bad parenting, plus feminazi THOTs with children.
7. X problems (reposted)
6. Steve corner
Andrew Bridgen: “Former Leicestershire police officer Dionne Miller blows the lid off Gordon Brown’s instruction in 2008 to let working class white girls be abused without police intervention because in the government’s view they had “made an informed choice about their sexual behaviour.””
Vox Populi: “David Cameron outlining his plans to displace “white Christian faces” with Muslims in every facet of British society, including the highest levels of command in the military and government. Conservative Muslim Forum Eid celebrations, 2009.”
Lewis B. Rendell Official: “This Pakistani Muslim woman, Shabana Mahmood, sits in the heart of our government as Home Secretary and has the gall to declare that “English” no longer means white, native-born folk like us, it’s now some watered-down civic nonsense anyone can claim after stepping off a boat.
She’s admitting what we’ve known all along: this is the slow erasure of the English people, a subversive genocide dressed up as progress. When she was young, “English” meant us, the indigenous stock of these isles, tied by blood, history, and soil. Now, with hordes of foreigners flooding in, she says it’s “less true” because more of “us” are settled here.
Us? She’s not one of us. Born to Pakistani parents, she’s as English as a curry house in Lahore. This is replacement rhetoric straight from the globalist playbook, denying our ethnic identity to justify colonising our homeland. She includes herself in that “us,” the settlers, the colonisers who flooded in after the war and kept coming. She’s celebrating the fact that our ethnic identity is being diluted, erased, replaced by her kind and others who have no roots here deeper than a visa stamp.
This is textbook replacement rhetoric, This is the prelude to ethnocide: deny the English are a distinct people with an ethnic core, redefine “English” as a civic club anyone can join by showing up and claiming benefits, then watch the natives become minorities in their own homeland while being told to smile about it.
She’s not English. She’s a British citizen of Pakistani Muslim descent, born here perhaps, but that doesn’t make her English any more than a cuckoo in a nest makes it a robin. English is an ethnic Anglo-Saxon bloodline, centuries on this soil, shared history Not a passport perk. denial of our existence as a precursor to wiping us out.
Yet here Mahmood is, gaslighting us into accepting our own demographic conquest. Her words are replacement rhetoric in plain sight: redefine English as civic and national so invaders can claim it while the original people are outnumbered and sidelined in our own land. She is not English. She is British by right of birth or citizenship, Pakistani by descent, Muslim by upbringing and faith.
None of that confers membership in the native people of England. Her presence in that office, combined with these words, is a declaration that the original inhabitants no longer have exclusive claim to their own name or homeland. It is subversion dressed as inclusivity; erasure presented as evolution. This is not integration. This is conquest by narrative and numbers.
The English people are white, rooted here for centuries, are being told to accept dilution or be labelled extremists. We reject the premise entirely. England belongs to the English: the indigenous stock whose ancestors forged this nation.
No redefinition will change that truth. Our identity must be defended without apology or compromise. Anything less is surrender. Wake up and fight, or watch the country vanish.