Wednesday [12 to 15]

(1146) Afternoon all. (1202)

 

15. IYE corner

a. Might be worth a gander in the days to come.

|https://govfacts.org/elections-voting/running-elections/election-security-audits/the-constitutional-provisions-that-give-states-not-presidents-election-power/

I suspect impeachments on the agenda come January 2027.  🍿🍿🍿
Actually I don’t give a hoot🥳

b. “The Rules Based International Order”

“ Karl Marx argued that capitalism would produce its own gravediggers. Most people assume he meant the working class.

But that’s not what he actually described.…”

|https://escapekey.substack.com/p/the-rules-based-international-order

14. It’s a young lady who said it, not I


13. Geelong, Australia, not unlike Young Bob here


12. How much fraud was behind it?

Wednesday [11]

(1110) Slightly reticent to use anything from my long book as last time, August I seem to recall, it got me into a mess of trouble. So this time, I’m going to try to cut out all the interpersonal and stick to the workplace aspects. (1111)

 

Signs and symptoms

This is drawn from the long book, most of which there is no point posting here. But every so often, it gets onto general topics of interest, e.g. concerning the correct site of the Temple mount in Jerusalem, the afterlife, many bits and pieces.

In this one below, the characters are fictitious but the quoted examples, e.g. appointing teachers, were very real, drawn from what happened in RL. I myself had mentors and am grateful, as their advice has largely held up over subsequent decades. Not always. Once, a private English student seemed fine, bubbly, interested … she stole my texts and did not return.

I’d missed the significance of the signs … that’s it.

……

The story to this point

Things were starting to go askew in society, baddies in charge, trying to snuff out possible problem people … very much like today … except I wrote this part about 2006, revised from time to time after that. It was set in France because at that time, I had a bit to do with Melun, south of Paris, plus the Fontainebleau area, plus Paris 12eme arrond. That’s the real part.

I invented a security section of females and the way I (meaning Hugh) found my (his) way there was that their leader, one Genevieve (Genie), had visited our town in Russia (real town where I lived). The two had an understanding by phone, he (Hugh) visited Melun and Paris.

All right … the storyline goes that this female section had many enemies trying to infiltrate it, pretending to be onside but actually being enemy (today with Establishment, letter agencies and Restore).

*Spoiler* Nadine ends up being a wrong-un but that’s later in the tale. *End spoiler*

In the scene below, Genie, accompanied by section assistant Nadine, meets up with Hugh and they discuss how two of the planted sleepers, Alana and Emmeline, had got past them for so long. Nikki (diminutive “Moineau”) is Genie’s old schoolfriend and now 2IC in the section, also Hugh’s partner (don’t ask).

……

The text

With Emmeline removed, the two sat forward in their respective chairs and Nadine explained.

‘The girls were sleepers. Not working for le Roux, someone higher. They sort of grew into our Section and their credentials were impeccable. What fooled Mademoiselle was that she’d known these girls from Melun – they’d been planted there years ago – it’s a very worrying trend.

Alana did it well but Mademoiselle noted Emmeline didn’t follow procedures properly. There were little things – her reaction to our tragedies was strange, her insubordination with Nikki was another factor, Nikki put it down to her age and yet we have a strict hierarchy in the Section which stops that sort of thing. We think they killed Melanie but we’ll have to wait till tomorrow to be sure.’

His phone now went. ‘Oui, Moineau – oui, she’s here.’ He handed Nadine the phone and could hear the conversation in dribs and drabs, ending with her handing him back the handset.

A few  words, the call ended, he asked Nadine, ‘About Alana and Emmeline … ah … um … what exactly -’

‘They’re not executed, we airlift them and drop them on a far away island with a three day pack of food, no mobile, plus a warning that if they make any attempt at coming near us again, ever, they’ll be killed.  We have a unit who can do these things, never been used, not yet, but we can call them in, we were offered this.’

.o0o.

Just after lunch, Geneviève appeared. Her head was back together and she was more in control of herself. They got down to business.

‘Let’s look at the Emmeline and Alana question, all right?’ began Geneviève. ‘I’d thought our selection procedures were pretty good – we’d chosen Nicolette, Nadine, Melanie –’

‘But also Elaine, Emmeline and Alana, I have to remind you.’

‘Yes, yes, that’s what worries me. We need better procedures.’

Nadine put in her contribution. ‘We need to check records better and check the checkers as well. Expand our database.’

‘You weren’t selected solely on your record, Nadine – it was Geneviève here who decided to take a chance with you. The ability to sniff out talent and danger is everything in the final analysis – data goes only so far.’

‘But that’s unreliable and it makes one person indispensable,’ protested Nadine.

‘That’s the eternal dilemma. But after a long period of time, even if you’re an unwise person, which describes me perfectly, sheer experience helps you pick up certain things but you can’t do it alone, this is the error many leaders make, they don’t listen to the middle ranks.’

‘Example?’

‘If an enemy wants to infiltrate, he’ll use sleepers who’ll get past your guard at the recruitment stage, then act perfectly normally for a long period of time, allaying your fears – they’ve studied you, know your weaknesses, they know the general system – you really must have others in there as well who can give advice from the side so to speak.’

‘Mademoiselle is good at picking up anomalies.’

‘She is, it’s her strength but she picks up certain kinds of anomalies she’s sensitive to, I’m the same, so is anyone, there’s no shame in this. For example, you and Nikki saw that this Emmeline was insubordinate to Nikki, but there might be other anomalies.’

‘Such as?’

‘This Emmeline’s manner was closed, too intense, too internalized. Plus she had a stud in her nose.’

Nadine huffed. ‘What does that have to do with it?’

‘Nadine, do you have a stud in your nose or a nail through your eyebrow?’

‘No.’

‘Why not?’

‘That’s my business.’

‘Why don’t you just say ‘because I don’t want to’?’

‘All right – I don’t want to.’

‘You’re a certain type, brought up in a certain way – this Emmeline was far more cavalier, less careful in her ways, I’ve watched you make the coffee and I’ve watched her.’

‘I don’t accept it.’

‘I do,’ Geneviève chipped in. ‘I’ve had my eye on her for quite some time and that coffee was one example.’

‘Why, Mademoiselle?’

‘The boys Emmeline hung around with were rough. Stupid, yes?’

‘No,’ said Hugh. ‘Exactly the opposite. You know the saying, ‘You’ll know them by their fruits?’ Each little anomaly, on its own, may mean nothing, might be inconclusive. But when certain anomalies of a kind are combined, then that’s possible danger. In normal life, we can ignore it but in a Section like this – it can’t be ignored.’

‘So, why didn’t you pick her?’ persisted Nadine.

‘Because I observed but then dismissed what I saw.’

‘What did you observe?’

‘Emmeline was about 167cm, hair tied back severely, hands large but arms skinny like the rest of her – almost 20 years old, dressed to appear more childlike than she was, made up darkly, steady gaze from the eyes betrayed something other than innocence.’

‘And?’

‘While I didn’t fall for her little girl beauty, I missed seeing the viper lurking behind the eyes. She was pretty – that’s how they got me in Russia.’ Hugh sat back in the chair and sipped his now cold coffee.

Geneviève had been listening carefully. ‘So are you saying we should be more vigilant?’

‘Not only. Yes, we should always be vigilant but we should always do things in conference – someone might have seen something we didn’t. And don’t forget they are trying to make you ineffective, they lay troubles on you, plus you lay troubles on yourself, such as me and so it does need those extra eyes and ears.’

‘Emmeline and Alana?’

‘Emmeline and Alana were designed to get past your guard, Genie, that’s why they were placed. Secondly, your own antennae weren’t picking up clear signals due to your own troubles and that was factored in – to make you less effective. Thirdly, those girls were only bit players, on the peripherique. And there is a fourth point.’

‘Go on.’

‘Sometimes we’re blinded by close association with people. On the grounds that we’ve been working with them for a long time and that they appear to be our kind of people, we make the logical jump that they are, therefore, good people. We don’t really know that – we don’t know who has what hold over them. Are they more likely to betray that or to conceal it?’

‘Example?’

‘Philby, Burgess and Maclean, especially Philby. There’s a less high profile example from London. My immediate boss and I interviewed a young woman for a teaching post and he asked what I thought of her. I said I really liked her – I have a bit of a problem with pretty girls, yes I know you can’t understand that – her methodology was sound, she was personable and the children responded to her.’

‘So you gave her the job?’ asked Nadine.

‘My boss refused, he said she was wearing denim at the interview.’

‘Excuse?’ Nadine snapped.

‘Denim – she was wearing a denim jacket.’

‘Yes? And what?’

‘To an interview.’

‘So?’

‘That was my reaction too at the time. Turned out though he was 100% correct – the girl had been trouble. Tiny point but he’d picked up on it.’

‘But how could he have known?’

‘Firstly, he was a naturally suspicious character. Secondly, it was only the faintest of suspicions. The rest was easy – checking the database.’

‘Did this boss of yours ever get it wrong?’

‘We both did. Another absolute little dream came for a job interview, exactly my type of girl, and we gave her the job. She was the front girl for a gang of thieves – that’s a true story by the way.’

‘All right – wearing denim and excessive prettiness, you claim,’ said Geneviève. ‘What other things would warn you?’

‘They’ll sound crazy and Nadine will go beserk when she hears them but I swear they’re indicative, they’ve been borne out by long experience, I myself ignored most of these or dismissed them in the early days.’

‘Go on.’

‘Any form of body piercing beyond earrings, a ring worn on the thumb, tattoos, dressing a la mode, excessive attention to make-up, arriving late for meetings, not apologising for things, speaking of ‘doing’ a country you’ve visited, excessive travel, beach worship, nightclubbing more than once a week, loudness in general demeanour or the opposite – excessive shyness, uncompromising attitude on certain issues, primaeval tendencies such as heavily rhythmic musical preferences, very personal questions early in conversations – I could go on and on. Remember – no one item is indicative, they’re only indicative in combinations’

‘What’s wrong with wearing a ring on the thumb?’ Nadine protested.

‘Nothing in itself as I just mentioned. But if you also club, wear clothes a bit on the immodest side and your speech is coarse, then that’s very much a sign. And certain combinations do often go together. We had to know these things professionally in one of my jobs.’

‘I still can’t see it.’

‘I can,’ said Geneviève. ‘I see it very clearly. Any other factors?’

‘Any number of them, Genie – taking yourself too seriously, unreasonable habits like being in a car and realising you forgot your compact and expecting the driver to turn around and go back for it, a man who uses come-on lines to a woman instead of natural conversation, excessive internet usage at night, general secretiveness, feeling things are unfair or that you’re not getting your fair share, coming up with new plans the whole time while not finishing the others and so on and so on.’

‘I’d appreciate it, Hugh, if you’d write those down and discuss them with me at a later stage. Any others?’

‘Hedonistic lifestyle, suntan in winter, beach worship, excessive muscular development in a guy, narrowed eyes, glazed eyes, feeling your business will break down without your presence, being a natural rebel rather than a natural loyalist, having no time for simple pleasures, doing only leisure activities which require money, inability to control personal finances, excessive shopping.’

‘Shopping?’

‘Shop-a-holics are sad people – not much inside them as people and compensating with external things.’

‘Like Louise?’

‘Yes, we keep coming back to her, don’t we? Incidentally, she wore a ring on her thumb.’

‘Yes, she did.’

Nadine had been listening to all this and was near-apoplectic. ‘But almost everyone I know does those things,’ she exploded. ‘Suntanning on the beach, for example – are all those people dangerous?’

‘It’s the combinations which count, Nadine, not single items. And not necessarily dangerous but sometimes just unreliable – it might not matter in everyday life but in our work – it does. Also, if they continue that tan into the winter – yes, they’re possibly unreliable. Not because of that itself but because of the mindset and the other things which go with that mindset.

You think this is outrageously wrong, don’t you, Nadine, because it attacks things in your age range which you accept as normal? I’m sorry, we can’t afford to worry about who’s upset about what – we need to be sure and so niceties don’t come into it. It’s not a foolproof method by any means but experience often bears it out and if that’s combined with things like your opinion on things, it gets pretty close.’

‘You’re sad. May I ask you something – are you happy in your life?’

‘Right now I am.’

‘You do have a penchant for provoking people, Hugh. All right, so where do we start?’ asked Geneviève.

‘With the fruits, of course – always the fruits. Take the specific of Emmeline – go into her flat at her invitation and observe. Go round with her for 24 hours, on some pretext, listen to the language coming from her lips, look at and listen to her friends.’

‘We do that already but I think we need to be better organised.’

She sent Nadine out for supplies and used the time to speak further.

For the chaps plus the chapesses too

 

As promised (threatened?) yesterday, the second clip, which chronologically was the first, with older sis saying about younger sis visiting her. Interesting to me was that neither seemed as enthused for Roy as they had for the Righteous Bro. Looks clearly has something to do with it, would you not say?

Imagine being ambushed by those two one night in a dark alley. Not sure if I should mention this but one evening near the end of my time in Russia, near enough to the flight date, I ran into an ex student, about 23, said I was headed for the pyramid cafe, did she want to go for a coffee, laughed as it was not a “thing”, could never have been, she lived in a nearby town reached by bus … she then thought again and said ok … and away we went … me thinking what on earth have I just started?

Wednesday [1 to 5]

(0439) In one sense, this is a layday … Hallowe’en, All Saints, All Souls, 3rd and 4th, then Guy Fawkes … further along is Remembrance Day. (0626)

 

5. A rare sort of op ed labelled as such

There are two lines which immediately struck home to me this morning:

  • Father forgive them for they know not what they do.
  • They say we’re young and we don’t know, won’t find out until we grow.
  • Your body is the temple of your spirit.
  • The average person is really quite dumb.

The last one is a paraphrase of sentiments of that nature. Both DAD and Steve have comment this morning … DAD’s opening about going to the Beeb and Steve’s over there about PTSD … that set me thinking (possible this morning because of someone’s prayer for me, good sleep and good recent eating and moving about, leaving me refreshed for now).

Also, someone else wrote about always taking care of your own airmask in a plane first, securing your citadel first, from there heading out and helping others. However, some wokeleft girl was quoted as saying it’s world first, the unfortunate (presumably invaders), your own second last and yourself ladt.

Except her virtue signalling, a skewed interpretation of gospel, was certainly to bolster her own good feelings about herself, validation of her as a worthy person pursuing only good, as defined by the Frankfurt School. How much was that behind people’s voting in the midterms?

Or not voting? Staying home? And across the pond, here, I bet we’re going to see the loony Reform honchos trotting out “split the vote”, as though Reform would be much better than LabCon in their flipflopping to shariah. People are not just dumb, they fear facing reality.

And if it’s a choice between horrible Reality versus virtue signalling self-validation and reality-avoidance, together with fear … then we know what percentages favour which of these choices.

My own suggestion? Well, it’s quite possible to note the Reality and plan accordingly, without wallowing in it. Hence the midterms mentioned in Wed [1] but let’s skip over those for other stories which may require looking at. Don’t dwell, don’t wallow, move on, work around, stay strong inside afap. Ok?

4. Steve at 1534

  • Ninth Circuit Delivers Major Election Day Win to Trump DOJ on Non-Citizen Voting
  • Guam Flips!.. Traditionally Democrat Guam Elects Republican Governor Tony Ada and GOP Majority for the Legislature of Guam
  • Alaska Voter Says He Voted Dan Sullivan Instead of Mary Peltola After Decoy Scheme Was Revealed: “I Was Disgusted. So Sleazy”
  • Aerial Clashes Trigger US Strikes on Iran’s Qeshm Island
  • Russia Targets Ukraine’s Winter Lifeline
  • The Secret Prison for Mobilized Soldiers Near Kyiv: How Relatives and Medics Exposed What the Authorities Preferred to Ignore
  • Experts Outline Three Foundational Ways to Support Exercise Recovery
  • Canadian whole-genome sequencing researcher switches from enthusiasm for mRNA “vaccines” to calling for them to be banned
  • What Are They Preparing Us For? (JH: I’m taking that one up, plus the PTSD in Wed 5.
  • Much more.

3. Lear 60

This is one I’ve not gone into, what with not being all that well (heart, dental), plus so much else to report on for days. But I did look last night and it was certainly intriguing in a macabre way. This first one below is my core post on the Lear 60:

This was as it appeared in feed:

These have also come out on it:


Ok, making sense of it all … firstly about the girl co-pilot. First reference I saw on X was of course pics of the 20 year old honey … and she was a honey in shape and size … possibly why the father chose her? No real idea here on what the interrelations of the nine on board were.

Two camps immediately formed:

  • The Feminazi camp about how fab that this girl could do anything better than any man
  • The second the MGTOW camp saying weeeelll, if you put a Learjet in the hands of a young girl … dot dot dot.

Two things struck me about the girl, apart from being a honey:

  • That photo of her posing by the plane, knees right through her torn jeans, suggested slovenliness, probably in many ways, along with the usual young female Orwellian-ness
  • That she was not actually flying the plane … the man was … she had input though … some suggestions are she was unhappy he was going to 47k feet

Now the man … what possessed him to try to outfly the storm? Against that was the fact of storms all over the state at that time. Also the crash or at least flight course was 5-7 miles from Mar-a-Lago. Uh huh.

Now to the problem of veracity of information:

  • In the Dave piece, quoting a retired Learjet pilot, he said you firstly don’t go anywhere near a storm in a swept wing plane and you especially don’t try to “out-top” a storm’s head so to speak
  • He played down ice and went more for “mach stall” or whatever
  • Who says this Dave even has a Learjet mate?

In comments on Dave, someone ran a notice about no communication of conversations, plane to tower, yet people were posting soubdtracks. Someone wrote that the crew were saying ice but it was moderate, ok, under control.

One viewpoint, inc. some pilots, was that something out of the ordinary hit the craft in that storm. I’m thinking I can’t go too much further, on the basis of what can be verified. Who’s to say how much was AI anyway?

2. DAD at 1534

I awakened during the night and made a bad decision to listen to the News from BBC World Service. I was wholly on the (possible) Democrap success in the election. One could almost see the smile on the face of the News Anchor and Correspondents as they told of the possible demise of “Trump” (as they called him). I have, for a long time, referred to the output of the BBC as Bloody Biased Crap; tonight they proved it.

a) France. Saint-Étienne (42): eleven cans bristling with nails seized during the banned demonstration on October 31; three men tried, two incarcerated.

b) Ukraine’s neo-Nazi conscription ‘torture chamber’: How the shocking scandal unfolded overnight.
Angry crowds attempted to storm a facility run by the Azov battalion, prompting the intervention of Zelensky’s top aide.

c) Brussels takes crisis preparedness into primary schools and revives 72-hour kits. The European Commission unveiled four non-binding guidelines on November 3 and proposed an annual EU Preparedness Day from 2027.

d) Poland’s UN envoy becomes third ambassador to quit over constitutional court ‘coup’ .
Three senior diplomats have stepped down after the government, backed by Brussels, used riot police to hand control of the country’s top court to judges elected by its parliamentary majority.

e) Why France’s $4 Trillion Debt is About to Break Europe.

1. Brief glance at midterms