(1712) Back from some downtime, evening all.
ddddd
19. Moo revisited
18. From IYE
| https://epsteinexposed.com/persons/howard-lutnick
ISLAND VISIT (CONFIRMED UNDER OATH): A December 2012 email chain documents planning for a visit to Epstein’s island. Lutnick personally emailed Epstein asking for GPS coordinates so his yacht captain could navigate to Little Saint James. Epstein’s staff scheduled lunch on ‘JE’s island’ for December 22 or 23, with Allison Lutnick copied on correspondence. At a Senate hearing in early 2026, Lutnick confirmed the visit under oath, stating it lasted “about an hour for lunch” and that he was accompanied by his wife, another couple, and their children. Epstein’s assistant confirmed the visit in records reviewed by investigators. A photograph showing Lutnick on the island was briefly removed from DOJ files before being restored.
JH: This is another example of not facing up to facts for many people. I fully accept it takes time, it needs sufficient corroborating or complementing data … but inevitably, one must face the reality. Same with Bannon. There were even photos of Roberts, Obama. Some are accepted more readily, e.g. Hanks, Oprah. Almost everyone has now accepted, in a different way, sbout Blair.
17. Something Alex M from downunder said
She went to a “nationalist” meeting as she called it and did not like what she heard. She is for one Nation there, which seems to me a bit like Marine Le Pen’s lot. My observation is that women are much softer in the evil they tolerate … and then we get Kobie or Marion Mariechal in France, plus quite a few here such as Katie who are much less tolerant if evil, such as killing one’s children … it overrides any issues the mother was having … doesn’t negate them, just occupies a higher place in the psyche.
But Alex used the word N*zi for these One Nation people she dislikes. She is for the party but not for what she sees as far right. She seems more Brit Reform than Brit Restore. Then she says she wants it back as it was in the 60s/70s. Well how on earth can she achieve that with all the invaders threatening the whole nation? The badly behaved places out there need banning, do they not?
What she didn’t like was that this meeting saw speeches like “Australia for Australians”.
And what?
So, despite all the keyboard rhetoric, she would not support the notion that certain ethnicities have shown themselves to be bad news, behaviour wise … but also the sheer legions of other ethnicities piling in now are a different kind of replacement problem. And then there’s medicine and certain conditions which are imported too.
And many women cannot bring themselves to face reality. Plus weak men. So what’s new? I did not see her as one of that latter lot.