Tuesday [1 to 5]

(0550) Morning all. This is one of those broken days for me where I do have a series of commitments outside as well as visitors earlier and later. That wreaks havoc with blogging and Xing, as well as requiring my legendary beautifying process before heading out. The ones who will not understand, as I’ll not explain it, is that those “not quite so close” are still expecting a visit on X, also adding AKH and Roob (see Scriblerus roll). I’ll do the best I can today.

 

5. Lord Toby this morning

… just checking in (url in blogrolls, middle column).


4. SadButMadLad double

He’s one of our main troopers with us as you’ll gather.


3. The situation at truckstops


2. On IYE’s drop

The question, in the light of Monday’s last post, comments section below, is how the landlord/editor should handle “sensitive material”. Methought that if I went through my thought process on it, whether my editing decision be right or as others might point out … wrong … that was how I was thinking.

First thought was post at NOWP and let it expand. First check on that thought is that NOWP is under the hammer of late. Second thought was to expand here. Third and the decisive thought was leave it right where it was and write about the item in Tues 2. Ultimately has a similar effect.

1. DAD at 1444

a) France. Euthanasia: The President of the Republic may invoke the second paragraph of Article 10 of the Constitution to request a new deliberation. Monseigneur the Count of Paris notes with regret the National Assembly’s adoption of the bill regarding aid in dying….

b) Burnham has said that his first policy will be to end rough sleeping:

“I will soon go through that door behind me and issue my first instruction: to end rough sleeping in our country.”

…But he failed in Manchester.

c) UK Ministry of Justice appeals order to publish convictions by nationality Shadow justice secretary Nick Timothy accused Labour of withholding information on politically sensitive crimes.

d) Europe’s latest Law has Christians asking: “Where can we pray now?” [Although it is a Catholic produced video, it applies to all Christians.]

One reply

  1. 2. Been sitting on that for a day or three. In the end I decided to drop it where I did with just the minimum signaling. I knew you’d understand. 😉

    ……

    JH: 😎

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *