(0627) Light appearing out there … morning all. (0635) The pink dawn has arrived out there … magnif. (0735)
10. Moo corner
9. A doc whose bona fides stand scrutiny
… and he comes out of it looking pretty good.
8. At 4 a.m., we’re essentially getting two sources
… last night’s North America and today’s Antipodes. This is of the latter:
Etcetera.
7. Sydney Sweeney
Obviously, this below, at Lord Toby’s, was written by a male, just as item 6 was also posted by a male … neither of those males is averse to the female of the species, providing she’s not Woke left, globo nor psycho.
In my case though, I vastly prefer the lass below to SS, the slapper (imho) and thus, in this case, I’m with the feminists:
Camaraderie? Wot, like in the WNBA? That sort of camaraderie? Moving on … even that lass below … why the plunging neckline? Shirley there are other males like myself who would ask, about Sweeney: “Would you like to see your wife attired as, acting like Sweeney?”
And this daughter type below … why must she rely on a plunging neckline when it’s a quite different attraction with her? What I don’t like about SS is she’s playing to a faux argument. The opposite of a Woke left, globo or psycho is not a slapper by any means … it is an elegant, feminine lady of yesteryear’s fashions … and there’s an added element … aesthetics … and is not the presenter of the Ella piece in n7 precisely that … seeing things from an aesthetic perspective.
Viewed from that stance, I don’t even think SS is aethetically a beautiful woman. For that size and shape, her boulders are just too OTT … out of proportion. Personally, I’m not into “perfect” in a woman, vastly preferring more normal, maybe carrying a few extra lbs or not … just … normal, real, human. Loving?
Aesthetica, by the way … he was the one breaking the Lola story in Scotland and he was in contact with L’s mother. What were the aesthetics there? I’m thinking the family unit, sisterly concern, all of that?
We really must address, I’m thinking, tha notorious male double standard. I find it useful to pigeonhole an Ella below as a “daughter type”, which then makes it much easier to relate to such lasses, e.g. the rape victims, hence Restore. Our own daughters.
SS is in the Only Fans category to me. That would be, if not ok, then understandable … but SS is not being marketed that way … she’s being sold as a summum bonum for men. Men would not marry that, nor Sophie Cunningham … lost it at 12, goes off with a black? It’s shirley obvious what we (should) admire in a woman.
Or is it so obvious today? Maybe the tsunami of worldwide porn, coordinated by Sabbateans, has hooked all men worldwide? Couple that with the feminazi family law courts allowing divorcees to take their hubbies to the cleaners? What man wants that sort of hypergamy? That sort of body count in his lifelong partner?
That’s before the coordinated assault on testosterone for decades now. Sweeney plays to that whole fabian destructive agenda. A normal man, normal woman, happy to marry and procreate with their own kind … that does not advance The Agenda.
6. This is to precede the post item on Sydney Sweeney
