(0729) clouding right over now. Just checking our local forecast … 13/6, light rain and winds.

ddddd

8. More on data centers

7. Steve corner

On Fri 23: The CIA – ceased being a force for good five minutes after it took over from the Office of Strategic Services (1942-45)..

Mr. Pool:

“Intentional.” That’s the word a CIA officer used. Under oath. In the United States Senate. Yesterday. Not “negligent.” Not “misguided.” Not “a failure of communication.” INTENTIONAL. James Erdman III.

Twenty years inside the CIA. Firsthand knowledge. He sat in front of Congress and said what got you banned, fired, and silenced in 2020: The lab made it. Fauci knew. The CIA knew. THEY BURIED IT. Their own analysts said lab leak was the most likely origin. They were overruled. Not by science. By ONE MAN who funded the lab, hid the receipts, and stacked the investigation so the conclusion was written before the first page was read.

You lost your job for saying this. You lost family for saying this. They deleted your posts. They locked your accounts. They called you a DANGER TO PUBLIC HEALTH for repeating what the CIA’s own scientists believed from day one. Yesterday — under oath — the United States government admitted YOU WERE RIGHT. Not partially. Not “in hindsight.” From the BEGINNING.

Every censored post. Every banned account. Every “fact-check” that buried the truth. Every doctor who was silenced. Every funeral that didn’t have to happen. INTENTIONAL. They didn’t make a mistake. They made a CHOICE.

And yesterday that choice was entered into the Congressional record with a name attached to it. Remember who lied. Remember who obeyed. Remember who KNEW.

Andrew Kolvet:

BOMBSHELL: Here is the entire opening statement from CIA whistleblower James Erdman lll. He testifies that Dr. Fauci’s role in the COVID cover-up was INTENTIONAL. He stacked the intelligence community’s analysis with conflicted scientists funded by NIAID who pushed the natural origin lie while obfuscating facts around a lab leak from Wuhan, China. CIA managers retaliated against analysts who refused to go along with the middle-of-the-night rewrite that buried the lab leak conclusion. Wow.

6. On DAD’s Sat 2b and 1383:11b

Geert Wilders was mentioned as one of the banned from the rally today. But why? I could explore Kassandra Troy’s prolific writing on Wilders a decade and a half ago … Dutch person about Dutch person … and how he’s controlled opposition, whilst appearing to be on a hit list for saying the right things. Might even ask her if I see her online today.

Now, if Kass is right, then what does that say about Streeting and Starmer … are they aware of the iffiness of Wilder, a bit like Meloni, Laila Cunnibgham etc.?