Firstly, what the screwtape letters (a novel) is all about:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Screwtape_Letters

We can come at this from a number of directions. CS Lewis and this lady below, Tilley, a pastor’s wife, come at it from the moral imperative as laid out in the bible, plus the need for women to remember their biological design and what it involves once fertile and ready …

… whilst I see it … yes, having biblical backing … but primarily in my eyes as the sociological dangers which this blog and contributors constantly point out … the extant threat that “screwtape” poses when evil in the form of fabianism and such devilry back to 1776, for want of a startpoint … once that gets into women’s minds and aspirations … once it gets a hold, women’s vanity, as Tilley describes her own sex’s weakness takes over and it’s all “I can do anything, I am Woman, worship me, see me roar” … it threatens that very society itself, it tears it apart.

In the devil’s clutches, women can so easily be led astray … and so can men.

I’ll say here and now that that sort of maniacal power hunger ain’t biblical for a start, it comes from another source. And it’s relentlessly pushed by (single) mothers, teachers, peers, media … Christy O took it apart in her old series.

And men? Loss of testosterone, wimpishness, SNAGishness … it’s no basis on which to defend your society nor build anything substantial. Especially once men drop into that antifa, rainbow, sicko mind virus, pontificating about love but being right vicious little bstds in reality, useless up against the savage invading hordes.

As a man who is no way MGTOW, though I see the arguments, my outlook has always been men and women in partnership, neither oppressing nor tyrannical towards the other … partnership, not constant war.

And the biblical model in the NT lays it down, though I see Paul as too “male society”, too patriarchal, calling everyone “little children” … better is the model in the gospels imho. We can argue over that one.

Going to finish this with Pat Connell’s selective logic … he had a tweet up about being an atheist. Uh huh … and his reason? Well just look at how churchmen (and now women) have behaved, paedo priests etc, narrowminded bigots.

Not disputing that, I’m no fan of priesthoods, grand masters etc. and as for the Spanish Inquisition, which nobody expects …

Pat gets onto the other killer religions causing nothing but horror and misery, he joins Karl Marx in expunging “them all”, quite ignoring that churchmen in no way equate to the societal model found in the gospels … one is human foibles, ego, incense and gobbledegook … while the other concerns how to personally reorder one’s life to become useful and help one’s fellow humans.

Plus the little matter of redemption, paid for with blood.