(1630) Evening all, gets dark fast, most things done here. You?
ddddd
20. These two items I’d saved for OoL
… but then didn’t run them:
19. Moo corner
Said to Moo … this is a bit out of my league, a bit reticent to run it, she was amused. Ok, against better judgment … here tis:
18. As he says
17. Part two of a two parter
First off, here’s the text of Beck and Winters from part one:
Second stop is to mention Fahrenheit 211, blogger … you’ll find him in HQ’s blogrolls, in the Main Roll, not elsewhere, not in the Honour Section. I labour this point because while those who say we are our choices thus take on board most of it, I also take on board most of it.
So what’s the issue? The issue is that a believer in free agency is missing key links in the chain. Am I more omniscient than them? Not in the least but I certainly do see things that they have not explored … not in great depth I mean. IYE has, Toodles has, any well read Christian has.
First, the F211text in which lies my objection:
“What angers me is it didn’t have to be this way. If Britain’s politicians had not thrown their brains out over the CO2 issue and if Britain’s Civil Service had not done the same then Britain would not be in this position. There would be less need to worry about regional or national blackouts or having to rely in grid interconnects with other countries, if different more sensible decisions had been made. If the British political and administrative classes had not shackled Britain’s electric grid to unreliable renewables and taken away base load coal burning generators, then we would not be staring down the barrel of the blackout gun with all that this entails.”
If you skip over the first sentence, then I’m quite onboard wi’it, from: “If Britain’s …” onwards … yes, agreed. Plus most of the rest of the post.
The issue is: “… it didn’t have to be this way.” Yes it did. All right, how can I explain? Take a look at this:
“Yes, they really believe this stuff.” In one, Clare … fanaticism. Glenn Beck has included a clip of these fanatics, esp. the fanatical young woman. That quote again:
Plus the feminised males. Let’s add this again:
Morals and taboos … a key pair of concepts. Why are they plummeting? Because the code on which westernism rested has been suppressed by fanatics, inc. fanatical atheists, convinced they control their own destiny, free of any sky fairy.
How can you tell someone is a fanatical atheist? It’s one who won’t admit of the Sabbatean Rothschild globo psycho paedo running the world. I might get you to accept the WEF at Davos, the Frankfurt School etc. but you’re going to baulk at the nephilim, at the Babylonian Talmud, which is essentially s*t*n*c, meaning it twisted the Hebrew Talmud, plus the Torah.
Look at Revelation 3:9.
If you’re not well read in such things, then how can you assert “human agency”? Human agency means essentially that we are free spirits, making free choices. As a rabid individualist, am I not also an advocate of human agency?
To a point … there’s the little matter though of the Tower of Babel, the Higgs boson, AI. There are limits which constantly confound the beagle torturer Fauci, or Mengele … conscienceless monsters. There are also ancient texts. Also lack of historical accuracy. The fanatical atheist says “paedo priests”, “bloodthirsty crusaders” … no argument. The sacking of Constantinople was by the Franks … explore them, also the Merovingians. Explore the star of David origins.
Explain the Key of David. Were it not vital, then why is Chas3 so fixated on it? The Key of David, the birthright … I watched two nights ago. It all turns on David. Bloodlines, people. Which comes back to Revelation 3:9.
And look at this bollox by the Chicago thug:
Just as with Reform, there are many devout rank and filers, goodly people … but not among the gang at the top. Explore Bank Ambrosia, P2.
Nuff for now.
16. Part one of a two parter