Sunday [6 to 10]

(0935) When I’m away longer than average in the mornings, it usually meaning I’m gathering, which is the case this morning. Part of that is the next post. (1042)

 

10. Moo corner


9. We can fix this broken country … like this …


8. Crown shyness? 🤔


7. Hmmmm … the interpretation is everything here


6. Time for Sunday’s religious component

… and I’ve two topics … here’s the first:


This can be quite misunderstood … it’s not directed at the non-believer per se … the Hitchens C, the Dawkins and others of limited brain encompassment … it’s more for the already at least nominally believing, those who’ve crossed the first line to seeing things historically, back to ancient times, not hamstrung by illuminati or fabian modernism … those who’ve managed already to reject the Rothschild/Sabbatean thing, understanding why the west has been hoodwinked.

It’s actually at the next barrier the quote rings especially true and was precisely what the gospel accounts were about … why was JofN so down on the Pharisees and other cults? Answer … they were into externals, not internals. In a similar way, Agatha Christie had a character, Mr. Satterthwaite, who was not fond of young people in packs … always so concerned with externals … stunts, showmanship, postulating, looking the part … not yet complete humans, still searching to find themselves.

Which brings me to South Park and the Brand Management of Ginge and Whinge … the whole thing was about playacting like a Farage. Also, remember Hyacinth Bucket? It’s also the difference between Alphas and Sigmas.

So that quote above is for those whose faith is still expressed in much loud speaking, in applying human foibles, in chanting en masse, not unlike at a Nuremberg rally, in strict hierarchy at Official Festivities, with those of simple faith versus the pointy hatters making big shows in full regalia, into full ritual, full of graven images. Externals.

There was a youtube about Mary. Mary has been abused by at least one large sect and the YT pointed out that she was never any more than humble, never in grotesque statues people are worshipping, whilst vehemently denying that that’s what they are doing.

The two examples pointed to in the video were when JofN was on the cross, gazing down, saw Mary. The word to address her was not mother but “woman”. The original language it was expressed in was a compliment, as in woman, mother of nations … not a blunt rebuff, as in modern English. She was handed to John to now look after, to take into his home. Why not the brothers? They were still lip service believers, externalists, could not be trusted. Yet. To everything, there is a season.

The other example was the last time Mary was mentioned in the bible … at the last feast, where she was just one of the crowd. Does a grandmother wish to be the star of the show, doing her song and dance routine, showing off? No, she just delights in the family all being there, surrounding her, showing some reverence.

That’s how Mary needs to be revered, not in some heroine worship, in loud chanting.

Countless believers have explained over two millennia that the payoff is protection, guidance, comfort and courage. However, the quid pro quo is danger and many times the awful consequences of taking that ticket, that stance.

Watch how many click out of this post now in disgust, offput by its tone … that’s one of the consequences.

8 replies on “Sunday [6 to 10]”

  1. Reform can’t be trusted with our identity. Tice completely swerved an ethnicity question put to him on GB News this morning. Long story but it’s to do with a reply made by Reform’s Suella Braverman MP on the BBC’s Question Time last Thursday. Was she British or English? Though she was born in Harrow, London, she averred that she was a British national because her origins were elsewhere. In her case India. In other words she is not ethnically English. Her answer prompted the white Labour MP on the panel to accuse her of racism. Decades of mass uncontrolled immigration we didn’t vote for and now, for good measure, they want to cancel our origins. You were right about Reform UK, James.

  2. Faith. Is it holding belief in something that cannot be known?
    Is there a difference between faith and knowing?
    How does anyone else know if the one expressing faith is being faithful?
    How would anyone know that someone expressing faith has lost their faith if they never talk about it?

    Faith and belief are internal to the individual mind. There is no requirement to express either through the spoken words nor by bodily actions. No uniform is required, no hierarchy needs to be supported, no special attendance at special places at special dates or times is required.

    No written words need reiterating or following.

    Someone who is deaf dumb and blind holds faith and belief as surely as anyone who can hear, speak, read.

    The West. Yes this label of modern times that is used to craft a point of duality. Its an appalling catchall term that is meaningless other than west being a different direction to east, north, south.

    East is bad. West is good. The duality made simple.

    That the population of this island is being actively altered by demographic change is undeniable. Its happening in concert with the erasure of all things British, the replacement of human to human contact with human to screen contact, the worshiping of the digital, and a guilt trip like no other being laid upon British people.

    The United Kingdom construct is the umbrella under which the organisation of people are going about their destruction and demolition of the British using his majesty’s government and its democracy illusion as cover.

    People have been imported for decades from countries where lives are lived very differently to the British by this organisation.
    Today the destruction is just about complete.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *