(0500)(0504)

 

10. Moo corner

We’re a bit light on for Moos just now … so one from a short while back…

9. Caught this yesterday in passing

… and we need further explanation. MMutR explained to me, I’ll see if I can get him to tell me again … perhaps you’re techie enough to:

8. Woke activist girls

https://jameshigham.substack.com/p/the-wisdom-of-woke-activist-girls

7. Lord Toby’s newsletter

Chris Morrison writes:

“The fallout from the recent Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) ruling that computer model high emissions pathway RCP8.5 is “implausible” is only just beginning. Most mainstream media fearmongering stories over the last 15 years need to be moved into the junk file, as do the increasingly shrill sandwich-board pronouncements of King Charles and Sir David Attenborough.

But the rot goes much deeper than ill-informed public comment, although that alone has been enormously influential in promoting the Net Zero fantasy. Activist-ridden science bodies such as the UK Met Office have brazenly used RCP8.5 to flam up weather predictions which in turn has led to onerous requirements being placed on British industry and finance.

Politicians have been convinced by patently ridiculous claims and Net Zero rules and regulations have cascaded through the economy and society.”

6. Penseivat wrote, earlier

“Off topic, sorry if it appears I’m trying to take over the blog!”

Modest English understatement. It takes a fair bit to “regularise” at this place, or fancifully, this tavern, as the landlord is a known deleter and blocker, unlike Lady Julia at her site and at Orphans … her position is to let anyone through regardless, in that fine libertarian tradition.

My position is that we want as much good content as possible, content which has run the gauntlet and has had to prove itself … no one excepted, not even me … and in this, we must be ruthless. To be fair to Julia, she then deals with baddies or the mindless in other ways behind the scenes … I tend to be summary upfront … and yet to hold back, cautiously at times.

Perfect example was the report that Anna Paulina had said that the CIA had raided Tulsi’s dept … later disproved, hotly denied by Anna Paulina. It was right here as a screenshot, ready to roll. Then came the disclaimers … quietly thankful, moi, that I’d not yet posted it. No innate wisdom involved on my part … maybe guardian angel.

We really must be subject to caustic scrutiny and leave up only that which has come through as “proably correct”.

And we can only get that by a “multiplicity” (ouch, apologies) of sound sources … I’m sure you get the drift here. There are three other terms involved in this … “consistency”, “determination” and “sheer bloodymindedness”.

Now poor old Redacted ran that gauntlet and was savaged and yet, and yet … much of what Juan wrote was sound, backed up. We need that material, if not the unfortunate manner. Solution? Set up another site (UHC-WP) as an archive, create homepages, gradually … Torquaymada’s is about to go up … but sometimes it’s a bit hot to openly run … it will get us hit by professionals … e.g. IYE’s on Mossad etc. Not taken down or deleted, but not spotlighted, let’s say.

And it’s constant decisonmaking, usually all right, sometimes challenged, which is our modus operandi … to challenge.

Slowly, anecdotes came in and I need to put this strongly … we need your anecdotes here, we want them, your reminiscences … so if you fear it’s taking over the blog … go for it. We have five venues you can choose to post at … if three go down, two should still be up.