(1452) Not quite evening all.

19. I’m going to take one of Steve’s on the WHCD

This bit:

“You can tell a lot about a man about how they instinctively respond when it hits the fan. In this photo, Stephen Miller moves on top of his pregnant wife to protect her. Pete Hegseth stands over his wife, surveying the scene while leaning over, protecting her.”

I was discussing it and I can see both reactions. Whilst a man with family is going to defend that family, but what if they’re not there at the dinner, none of them? What if you’re the sole invitee from your family there? And what if you hit the floor under the table in order to ensure your family continues to have a father?

Ok … what about a man now without any family any more and he’s at the dinner, sitting with a charming lady beside him? The answer is that such a man, esp. at this age … we all have to go sometime … may well dive across that lady to take the bullet for her.

Why? He’s not married to her, she’s not family. The answer again is that if he dies, it’s with a Sydney Carton posthumous name … a far, far better thing than he’d done up to this point.

A detractor points out, “Nobody’s ever going to remember you … you’re a nobody.”

True … it’s not for any sort of public name but only for those few people he counts as friends … that’s all. It’s for them. He feels he can exit with dignity.

“But who’s to say you’ll be killed? What if you’re now a quadraplegic for another decade?”

“So?”

OK … let’s buy that the whole thing was a set up, kabuki theatre, all knew their parts. Uh huh. I still say that if it changes at least some women’s minds about the sexes, that’s a good thing. If it inspires men.

18. The WHCD

17. USAID

16. Housekeeping

It was always going to be the case that as long as we had it that we’d countenance no Wokery here, no globopsycho narrative … then the max fallout would be loss of posts or even blogs by platforms’ heavyhanded pretence that the real truth on an issue was “misinformation”, whilst Wokery and demonic psycho was somehow “community standards”.

We could live with that. This blog is neither Israeli nor Malsi … it’s the West as we once knew it and we want it back, with the focus on each of our nations. Things on, say, Israel and Malsi, would be different angles, occasionally posted and disagreed upon.

However, the worst thing for this site would be if someone was so fixated on “Jews bad” and another main author was “cut them some slack, they’re not too bad”, Malsi is the issue … and that then becomes a middle-east war here, right on our pages, whilst our own countries take a back seat.

This is not the time for the site moderator to suddenly have heart issues, as he struggles to be moderate. So Sod’s Law says this is precisely when he will have heart issues. None of which solves the Jewish-Malsi imperialism … if that could be solved by western nations, then it would have been. And both those interlopers know that fullwell.

Both those sides, played like violins by globopsycho, get everyone at each other’s throats, the intemperate language starts, then the rest of it. I am not by any means saying don’t post, let’s all love one another and hug trees … I’m saying we must not lose sight of being played … not just by the hated Jew but also the hated jihadi or the WEFer or Chinaman or Russki … their ultimate aim, all of em, is OUR division and destruction and we let them play us, rather than refuse to.

This is a strategic question. Did Net the Yahoo switch off the iron dome, leading to what happened? Yes. Did jihadis load women into cages and burn them? Yes. Do Sinatsikap pack rape women and girls? Yes. Let it go? No. But don’t ONLY see one group to target … they’re ALLat it, inc. our pollies. There’s no zero sum in this.

Having said all that, I’m about to start my own caustic comment on various matters.