(0834) Light out there. Only one ladies pic, so no ladies at lunchtime today … currently no quiz questions but I’ll try to get some posted mid-afternoon. (0941)

6. For Juan and reader/droppers in general

a. First off, there’s no hard and fast rule about where to leave comment now. Ideally on the topic in a post but if new material, e.g. Juan … then wherever the comment “takes”, where it works. It’s temperamental, WP, plus it decides it does not like certain words and phrases … so best avoid those, use euphemisms. Also, please keep trying because we need your input very much.

b. I’m going to repeat two photos which is sort of the backstory to nourishing and now unherdables … regulars, longtimers already know all this. I thought or one of you did, can’t remember, maybe Chuckles, that it’s a bit like in this pic:

The lighthouse keeps pumping out the signals within its range of operation, it does not attempt to become a chain of lighthouses or a celebrity lighthouse, it prefers not. If some passing ship stops in at the safe harbour just beyond the point, then the crew will find a tavern with several rooms, sustenace, bars, then across the carpark are chapel, stables, outhouses for this and that … obviously accommodation.

There are also various roads on the land leading towards the tavern, it’s a meeting place … the landlord is Higham and the people drinking and chatting are patrons, regular or passing through. Rules are minimal, laid out on the policies page. Having said that though … Wokery gets short shrift, ditto with globopsychoism … that bint Sen. Ernst would not be welcome.

Here’s a (fanciful) view from another angle, part of our invented backstory:

5. Lavrov interview

I’m late because I just listened to the entire Tucker-Lavrov discussion, all the fine detail too. Tucker is in a strategically vital place for world non-kaboom because it bypasses the psycho warhawks, funded by ill-gotten billions in currency and connects directly to Americans and Brits, also to some Europeans. How many intend to even listen to the interview?

Because the only way to stop or at least hamper the psychos is for the ordinary American etc. to become aware and to primary the end-worlders, starting with reversing the cheating we’ve seen. To my mind, any political pundit not addressing the issues raised in the interview is falling down on the job and failing to serve his/her readership.

The sense I get is that Russia will avoid nuclear warheads afap but Biden/Obama, plus those controlling them, are literally insane. As always, it comes down to strategic resources, plus money, plus real stick when a tyrant is defied (just look at Starmer, the meat-headed maniac.

In the West though, overall, it is more oligarchical, more defused … Fink, WEF honchos, the CFR, Chatham House, Tavistock, BIS, the black nobility, the Bavarian bruderheist, various others, e.g. the banksters who come out of the fallen Templars of yore … and so on. Thule comes into it. Starmer is a useful idiot because he’s so completely under the spell of the rhetoric that he spells it out …

… it’s always new society, new order, break it all to smithereens and build back better, the great work of ages, moriah conquering wind and all that utter bullsh. Wipe out whole populations, both the vulnerable and the glower of youth … always, never changes. Ever since I started the blog in 2006, it’s been completely about these … not so much the Pigboy Daves themselves. In 2006, you can well imsgine how my “out there” ideas on such things went down. I’ve never changed this stance. Now it’s coming into the mainstream, just as the covid thing has … though far more people were onto that one from its inception.

I’ve always said that, while Brexit was a good way to start the dismantling, my eyes have always been far more on destroying the EU than on Brexit per se. Dismantling, brick by brick. As for Bush/Blair and other mass-murderers … there it is.

The USSR was just as bad in the mid 80s and earlier, Russia is still no angel … it’s not an “either or” situation, as Lavrov said. Putin, for example, was under the influence of the siloviki … how much now … no idea.

WW3? Completely down to the ones running Biden. Retaliation with nukes? Most certainly.