First the song:
Then the film:
First the song:
Then the film:
(0742) News and features come and go … Mon morn, early, is usually a bit thin, it starts coming in about 0900. Rupert’s rape gang report in the Commons late in the afternoon (0817)
10. Moo corner

9. Bunker busting

8. Ray Epps

7. Toddlerboarding
6. Generation Jones
It’s the second half of Boomerhood in the States … probably about 1955-64, has more meaning there but is still a valid cohort.



(0510) Morning all. Holding up all right here so far, hope you are too. There’s a series continuing here today, you saw the chicken warning. It’s about foodstuffs, not all from the same site, starting after the second batch of news items, with IYE’s in comments (yoghurts) and mine probably tomorrow. (0534)
5. Alberta

4. Steve at 1398
3. Is it “people” people want
… or is it a duplicitous showman and pretty boy?

2. DAD at 1398
a) Riots across France after PSG-Arsenal: last year’s disaster repeats itself… One dead, 780 arrested, and 57 police officers injured. Looting, vandalism, fires, firefighters attacked. Laurent Nuñez rejects the term “chaos”.
b) “The situation was generally under control,” said Laurent Nuñez, Minister of the Interior, regarding the disturbances that occurred after PSG’s victory.
c) German police stop re-migration activist from boarding flight to Porto summit. According to the German police, spreading the concept of re-migration is “problematic”.
d) Nike and Dutch street-wear brand Patta joined forces in a new campaign promoting the Dutch national team’s new kit ahead of the 2026 World Cup under the slogan ‘Strength is found in diversity’….
e) Canal+ has said it would no longer work with the more than 600 film professionals who signed an open letter attacking its right-wing owner, Vincent Bolloré. (JH: A bit complicated, this one.)
1. In which I’d urge great caution
… in attaching any weight to this. It could easily be a double or triple cross in that the “revelation” might be bogus, just a few comments on some blogpost which is never given us, though the date stamp is top left for when I saw it. Purpose? To vilify the commenter, therefore someone Restore leaning. It could be a Reform dirty trick, it might be a Makerfield working class or middle class lass who does not hold back. Might not even be a lass.

It does go to show that one must be careful repeating gossip, also it gives govt an excuse. There was a Grok check which verified that the comment had gone up but not who this female is.