(0809)(0907)
4. Dismantling the deep state
… if the Donald is indeed serious about it, is a vast task, as it’s not just the players, is it … it’s the complete restructuring of even the way govt central to local is organised … this is brought out nicely in the episode of Clarke and Dawe which follows this post. It’s getting everyone who is involved to start even thinking differently as to what’s normal and logical.
And those who’ve invested everything, all their working lives, to restructuring things such that the shekels fall into their coffers are not going to take kindly to Trump/Hegseth’s “peace through strength” … it makes no big money through human misery.
“In the second part, Benz starts to explain the scale of Donald Trump’s task of deconstructing the Deep State and its censorship ‘mercenaries’, not least because of the mutation of democracy into institutional consensus building and imposition, suiting these interests but no longer representing the will of the people. He continues this discussion using as an example of the US’s control over Ukraine’s supposed democracy in this third part.”
I can only refer back to the Clarke and Dawe piece later … nail … head.
Which brings us to women themselves and Gillibrand yesterday in the Senate. It’s deep in female genes to get hold of an idea of what’s good and bad … she then fearlessly chases her notion of good, allowing nothing to stand in her way.
If you can get her to start supporting something through a sort of linking up of feelgood phrases … the Woke mind virus … you can get her supporting all sorts of wrong … vehemently … like a heat seeking missile … and so she acts like Patty Hearst, Meinhof, the girl at Beslan happy to mass murder for a cause … every aborting late teen as a lifestyle choice … if you are so evil you’d organise it to appeal to all the wrong things in a female … you’re a Charles Manson or Jim Jones.
Such monsters know that ladies have just gotta be part of the action, depending on what the action is at the time … its in her genes to do so … love in a cottage, the male ideal? No way, Jose.
A woman who marries, has children, is running a home economy, is protecting her patch … she’s the sort that this blogger immerses himself in … you see them quoted the whole time and there’s one of women’s core strengths right there … getting messages out articulately. If those are good women, dedicated to holding good things together, knowing their limitations, not some stoopid bint having 1027 men in 12 hours … yes, very sad case … then things fall into place, start going well.
Here are some perfect examples on the question of women in the front line, in charge of ships, organisations (LA fire dept) … posted by women:
Why is it so hard to get esp. young, unmarried, childless (at that point) females to see reason? One answer is that they’re so physically adept … I’ve seen, you’ve seen, young females do astounding things with their bodies … gymnastics, dance, with a ball, whatever … sheer class.
Plus feminazism dictates that girls must NEVER concede limits, coz “they’re every bit as good, if not better, blah blah” … and in certain ways … the female is simply not … esp. in perception, peripheral vision etc. Gals are just different.
Part of that is fearlessness … yep, I was too as a child, understood not what could actually happen. Not now, matey.