(0348)(0348)
The significance today of the SCOTUS ruling later
In Britain, in the middle of the night before the Last Supper at the other end of the day, are the issues of age verification (or digital ID) rollout, Starmer’s speech to “the nation” and that of other toothless “leaders”, plus the appalling state of the NHS.
Across the pond are the Artemis rocket thing, approaching Easter, plus a most critical piece of condtitutional law before SCOTUS today, hours from now. Some screenshots sum up the state of play:




Just looking at the last item above here … Alito is staunch conservative, Thomas is too, Gorsuch and Kavanaugh are the newbies and are “often” but not always conservative, meaning for the western nation first.
The problem is the leftist Barrett, while Epstein compromised Roberts will vote with the Demonrats. The significance of the application to SCOTUS, causing Trump to actually be in the gallery yesterday, is that it snuffs out foreign freeloaders, just as with the Windrushers and boat people here.
The argument of the EO is those capitalised words above … if the proposal is approved, 5/4 … and it’s down to Barrett now today, then flying in from Kenya or British Guiana in our case (Gina Miller) is not sufficient for citizenship … the person must embrace the law of the land, uncompromised.
Meaning, a Chinese woman can’t rock in, or a Moose Limb, have a child and then go back to Chinese or Moose Limb jurisdiction, whilst eligible to US benefits.
It’s down to Barrett … which way the raving leftist, appointed by Trump … votes. What we know is she hates Trump with full TDS. Will that win out … or the good of the nation?

















