(1537)
What to do with anomalies which don’t seem to fit our own construction, our own narrative?
It would have been nice to have Nigel storming to govt but first … anomalies appeared … many managed to set them aside, e.g. Kipper days, TBP … but then how Rupert was handled really did hit home with many, inc. me.
As a person with no faith in Beloved Leaders (human), I was always puzzled that DTJ did not move hell and high water to get the J6ers out, after outrageous process, did not keep up the pressure, with the entire right.
There were quite a few anomalies, strange appointments, we were warning about such people but it was as if he never read social media platforms, no one close to him did either. There was McCarthy, there’s Johnson now … quite puzzling.
DTJ wanted Greenland … ok, check, made sense for the US. The failure of Uke peace talks … wwweeellllll, par for the course, we’ve covered that. The behaviour of Senate and House? A known known.
But one or two sit uneasily. The buying of both ends of the Panama canal by the U.S. in itself was fine … made sense. But it was not the US who bought it, was it? It was Blackrock’s Fink.
And then the latest … the Chinese have not lost it at all … Blackrock was told no.
We’re used to making excuses … well he’s nearly 80 … but all the same, it’s not a good look. If DTJ is in thrall to Nethan the Yahoo and that powerful bunch … why and how? Javanka? Then there are all the things written at nourishing and Unherdables.
In short, how many anomalies do we allow before starting the disgruntled sounds?