That jargon term is not the most respectful, better is “Bobbies” … and yet today, it’s more and more applicable. I think of our resident Dixon of Dock Green here, Penseivat, and welcome his counterpoint … there are some not so pleasant things in the sshots below.
My own tuppence worth is two incidents, both in Russia …
I was driving with my mate beside me, former tax inspector, we were at the lights, turning right, “road plod” were ahead, the green arrow was on, they never moved, maybe unaware … I honked them .. my mate sank down in the seat, mouthing jargon at me … the police did go right, clearly taking the honk as a signal that the lights had changed.
For fifteen minutes, I now received the lecture on how police were now so openly tools of the state, having to fill a quota of fines each month … one thing they were not was to be there for you. My mate was amazed I’d got away with it … Russians steer well clear of that sort of trouble as a rule.
The second was in Moscow, I’d got off the train, had to put 24 hours in, needed a place, approached a young plodster if he knew of anywhere. He just stared at me, realising of course that I was foreign. An Asian came up, said he knew of a place. Once there, I phoned my friends in south Moscow, they came by train.
First question was … however had I found this place, miles from the centre? I said I’d had to go with my reading of the man, plus the policeman had heard all too. I reasoned that he might have intervened. Weeks later, back in our town again, my mate was stunned again, then shrugged.
The walking cure: How a simple daily stride can transform your brain and mental health
Taking stairs just 6 flights daily slashes heart death risk by 39%, major study
âCries for Helpâ: The stories in V-Safe they tried to keep hidden from public view
Wokeismâs War on Sanity
Much, much more.
3. Andy at 1510:9
2. DAD at 1510
a) Europeâs suicide in full swing as France descends into chaos.
Franceâs violent riots stem from a long-predicted cultural collision that Western Europe has failed to address, not from protests against schools, according to analysis by Junge Freiheit.
b) Fake News on French riots rips away the façade that the Media ever cared about âReal-World Harmâ.
Reporters spent the last 10 years demanding censorship of right-wing populists and now are promoting the left-wing misinformation driving the street violence.
[DAD â This site is new to me. It looks OK.]
c) The Left-wing are trying to destroy Marine le Penâs Deputy.
Key witness in Bardella anti-Semitism case says Mediapart manipulated his words
âMr Bardella never told me that he admired Adolf Hitler, at any moment, and it is not something I sensed eitherâ.
d) Gosport MP âkept in the darkâ by Labour over overnight migrant influx.
A Conservative MP accused Labour of giving no advance warning before 149 migrants landed overnight in her Hampshire constituency, sparking protests that led to twelve arrests.
e) Dr. Myhill challenges Professor Whitty to either resign from his position or sue her for libel. The letter accuses him of acting as a dishonest doctor and bringing the medical profession into disrepute by breaching the Hippocratic Oath.
f) RAF Fairford 7th Arrest by Counter Terror Police. A slightly âtongue in cheekâ report.
(0624) This will be run at OoL, Jstack and over here. The day of the massacre. (0644)
Two opposing views on the massacre
But Ben Swann in Florida says:
Each reader will have his/her own view on it, his/her own intel. My slant is as a Restore oriented Brit and âď¸ian within these isles. I believe that the gangs in control of nations are the enemies of their peoples … I’ve blogged on that since 2006.
I believe that a state enabled pro-Hamas march in London on this specific day is an offence against God and nature, especially given the state sponsoring of the invasion here, e.g. at Gosport, where the state, under Mahmoud, turned on local people.
The King went on to visit the Russian Czar and the German Ambassador reported to Kaiser Wilhelm that Edward desired peace. The Kaiser wrote on the report:
âLies. He wants war. But I have to start it so he does not have the odium.â
… by “the young Scot” as I call him. You can call him a young Scot apologetic if you like … he’s been roundly criticised and applauded by roughly equal numbers.
The first obvious enemies are going to be the Dawkins types, inc. university academics (I know them well), also dark arts uppities such as masons, the illumined, euroroyals, black nobility, fabians, other nations e.g. China, Arabs, Babylonian Israel (Rothschilds, Sabbateans, Franks), the Venetian push (see La Rouche) … there are just so many baddies who would attack.
My reply to those who say there was no Moses, no Abraham, no Noah, it’s all just a ruse by one ethnicity from ancient times … is ok, where are your receipts, your final proof? Because I see plenty of evidence for much of it, inc. Egyptian, Assyrian, Babylonian et al. Why should you frame the argument your way? I’m framing mine based on a lifetime of reading too.
What I like about the young Scot, his choice of bible excepted, is that he does seem straight, exploratory … as I am. You see, I did not come to my view by some instant Damascene moment … I had one at 12 but then largely went off and lived the same life as most westerners, at one point a naughty boy, trying this and that, partial to the female.
But where my mates so easily fell into what I call the Royal Society, Fabian hegemony, zeitgeist (so academically respectable, so politically correct), I stood at a distance and said why on earth are all these documents not documents? They very much are, just as much as Enoch. For a purpose? For sure. But a Sherlock Holmes would try to clear his mind of a priori prejudice, long enough to read as dispassionately as possible.
The young Scot has simplified for his viewers, yes … e.g. the Semiramis, Nimrod, Tammuz tale, the story of Ur and Uruk, the ziggurats … but why not? He’s read quite widely, whereas Colonel Harrumph types, professional atheists, have done diddly squat by comparison … they’re just not interested.
Which eventually comes down to “old wives’ tales”, myths, legends … what is a “myth” after all? Is it not a history which the hegemony rejects at the time? What of Oz aborigine Dreamtime? People made what sense they could of the things they encountered … astrology, alchemy, annunaki. But there’s been a consistency all the same, from ancient times, much from oral tradition, then written. Dead Sea scrolls? Piltdown Man?
Do I buy Joseph of Aramathea in what is now England? Why not … but also why? We know why Blake wanted it. And Yeats across the ditch wanted his Celtic identity. Also, do you trust a Scot from the home of paganism? Goodness, even the bleedin’ Scottish Rite is seated up there. Which in turn is Templar. And if we’re starting on that … then we’re also talking Franks, Welfs, Third Temple, Genoa.
A huge bleedin’ field, innit? Were you born back then with total knowledge of all things at all points of history? Excuse me if a slight smile appears at the corner of the lips and a sparkle in the eyes. Where’s the humility of the scholar gone?
Lastly from me just now … why would youtube uploaders who are capable of clips of any length from any openly available movie … find it so difficult to run the most important scene in the movie imho? 12 bleedin’ seconds in one upload only from a major movie? Why? Why so constrained and curtailed on youtube?
