Category Archives: Uncategorized

Friday [1]

(0551) Morning all, befittingly gloomy out there. This is the second promised (threatened?) part after last evening’s and I’d best get it written before the day starts. (0719)

 

The necessity for accuracy whenever claiming to be “Christian”

What fun this is going to be.

Human versus inspired authorship

I start from the premise that there certainly exists something called “inspired” and Joan of Arc would agree.

But it is dangerously easy to slip into errors (rather than priesthood declaredand proscribed Error and Blasphemy). Just look at the clowns in Congress and Parliament, in thrall to moneyed outside interests and you’ll get an idea as to my estimation of Priesthoods, Leaderships.

Denominations arise from Priesthoods and in the history of Israel, it fell into errors, first of all in shifting from the written Torah to the oral Talmud to the Babylonian …even in earliest days, the Enemy was diluting, leading astray (e.g. Gnosticism), inserting entirely erroneous elements if you accept the earliest inspiration as holding water.

Scholars are well aware that oral traditions are very much at the mercy of the Priesthoods and you only need look at our “secular Priesthoods” to know how corrupt they are. Church of England?

Yet scholarship is the only real approach to finding out, which leads to …

Revisionism


Here’s an example:

The Book of Enoch was excluded from the mainstream biblical canon because scholars determined it lacked authentic prophetic authorship, was not recognized in the original Jewish scriptures, and contained speculative theology.

Specifically, the text was omitted for three major reasons:

Authorship and Date: Though attributed to the pre-flood patriarch Enoch, textual analysis shows it was compiled by multiple anonymous authors over centuries (circa 300 BC–100 BC).

Lack of Jewish Canonization: It was never included in the Hebrew Bible (Tanakh) or the Greek translation of the Old Testament (Septuagint) used during Jesus’ time.

Theological Inconsistencies: The book contains cosmology, angelology, and narratives that early church councils deemed contradictory to accepted scripture.

While the New Testament book of Jude quotes a passage from it, early church leaders concluded that quoting a specific verse did not validate the entire book as divinely inspired. However, the Book of Enoch remains fully canonical in the Ethiopian Orthodox Tewahedo Church.

All right … finding an acceptable version is the issue, one many scholars might agree on. There was Tyndale of course and no doubt those interested will mention their fave version but the one which has stood, either side of the pond, is KJV. Perhaps with a glance at Strong’s Concordance.

Yes, I’m well aware of the criticisms but it’s a sight better than, for example, the NIV which, by its very reducing of the crucial language to modern-speak, invalidates it imho. KJV is the go-to, within the context of earlier versions … which goes for prayers and creeds too, e.g. Apostles’ Creed versus, say, Roman Rite.

Plus we already know the Filioque clause which split the Church … but not the church of all who subscribe to John 3:16. And don’t forget Ephesians 5:3 to 12 and 6:10 to 16.

As I mentioned yesterday, I am very much from a scholastic rather than fervent, happy clapping or ritualistic approach. In fact I retreat from over-fervour, more in an old Anglican sense. Plus aspects of Churchery like the sun symbol surrounding the cross in RCism, Popery, that egregious receiving hall in the Vatican … incense swinging, worshipping Mary and yes … it very much is that, then icons too … beware, people, beware.

What was the second Commandment?

“You shall not make for yourself a carved image, or any likeness of anything that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or serve them…”

Think on’t.

Consequences

The Crusaders sported red crosses on white tunics but in Constantinople, they were Merovingian heirs, the Franks, quite unChristian, yet their slaughter, e.g. in Jerusalem (ankle deep) was as bad as any pogrom you care to name (Darfur, October 6th in Modern Israel) … plus the influence of Khazars and Ashkenazis, who themselves have skewed Judaism and Zionism.

Anyone heard of the name Rothschild?

And you saw yesterday the merging of the US and Modern Israeli armies. Massie says that Section 219 does merge them:

Final vote total for the NDAA today which tragically merges our military technology and supply chains with Israel’s. Let’s hope this version fails in the Senate because Section 219 is a betrayal of our sovereignty.

… while Glenn Beck denies it. Also read IYE on Shapiro, also the CK killing and EK before and since then. All people involved have been vilified by someone else. And why are Whitehall and the Civil Service so vehemently against Israel and Russia and so pro-Moose Limb? Royal Family too.

Minefield, eh? Particularly when correct theology insofaras it can be determined by oldest sources (not including “suddenly newly discovered”) is a crucial matter.

Fifth columnists and planted traitors

From earliest days to Farage and Shapiro, Massie, Rand Paul … who exactly are the fifth columnists, according to the creed and nationality we subscribe to? You to yours, me to mine. Mine is the Cross of St George plus Triune God in KJV terms.

Scholastically, one really does need to delve into antecedents, e.g. someone writing G-d or Yahweh, though I AM seems to be generally accepted by most across the faith. Someone almost never quoting NT but steeped in OT … not conclusive in itself but with certain aspects, e.g. the militaristic, emphasised over the “gospel of peace”.

A scholar really needs to know the antecedents of the person pronouncing on it. But we know that at Unherdables … it’s our bread and butter to be quite careful, cautious.

Let’s come back to Enoch and angelology as I’ll call it. There’s an immediate conundrum … Matthew 22:30. If there is no person to person marriage in Heaven, then how did Enoch’s fallen angels, the nephilim, mate with human females?

Because that might explain why Gates, Soros etc. are never bumped off. They can’t be, they’re only part human. Which in turn explains the paedo sicko behaviour of the “upper class” scumbags.

However, as IYE might or might not suggest … what if it’s nowt to do with that and in fact we might look more at Icke’s suggestions. Now IYE, I did write “might or might not”. Please clarify. 😎

D*m*nology

Toodles pointed out, quite rightly, that nowhere in the KJV does it mention d*m*ns. Yet I have been using the term often, plus I labelled someone damian long ago. What does the KJV call them? “Evil spirits” or “devils”. Interesting eh?

Any conclusions?

We are caught in a bind, knowing what to trust, whom to trust … we must know the person’s antecedents because there are infiltrating fifth columnists all over the place. False prophets perhaps. Locusts?

We need to have our scripture at least agreed. No point KJV favourers trying to argue with Modern Revisionists, e.g. about Ephesians 6:12. And as for the vast pseudo-rationalist “community” … where’s the basis for even beginning discussions?

Chaps and chapesses … I need a coffee and some toasties. END OF PART TWO.

Afterword and acknowledgments

Yes, thanks to both Toodles on the theological side and IYE on the alt-historical side. Naturally to our other “droppers” as well but in these matters within this post … particularly those two.

The truth is that those who’ve been at this for many decades, even since toddlerhood, I believe do have a claim to expertise … as distinct from Johnny-Come-Latelies such as me, plus more recent converts who at least partly bring their old traditions with them.

Thursday [11 till close of play]

(1710) Evening all. So much incoming right now. Still 22 items to go, can’t get them all done this evening … plus, my energy starts dissipating around 1900. One special item is in two parts, superweird and yet we had precedent at the old N.O. … plenty of receipts. Plus things which happened in Russia … very weird place. I’m keeping that back till last item, then starting tomorrow in Fri 1 with the second part. So first … some regular politics as such.

 

17. The physical and metaphysical interface in the human psyche

How’s that for a heavy opening, eh? Right, I in my base, resting mode, am largely secular, scholastic, investigative, ferreting. I always basically accepted a Triune God because there seemed no good reason not to, plus those most vehemently against any sort of spitituality whatever … they seemed very closed, deliberately closed, as in wanted nothing to do wi’it, as in this:


But that cuts both ways. Most readers of this secular blog and it shall remain so, are okish with the occasional religious reference but not obsessive preaching I’d say. But some are visibly agitated. And I know some who go into instamockery with prepared positions on every point. So if someone has a weird experience, these people suddenly and assertively insist it was atmospheric conditions, had to have been interference of some kind.

In fact, the letter agencies use Faraday cages in their experimentation, they’re happy to probe the mind (more in part two tomorrow … look up GH Estabrooks and Jolyon West for starters, Sid Gottlieb). At some point, soul intrudes into the probing of mind. The godless oaf positioning himself as a “neither fear nor favour arbiter of truth” … I’ve found to be pig ignorant of the history of these things, plus mind tight shut, impervious to that reason he’s forever banging on about.

Reason, my friends, when it encounters anomalies … what does it do? Tries to explain it away, feverishly or with smug assurance? Or is “reason” capable of delving like a bloodhound?


You think I have not lost friends over me saying there’s obviously something to all this. And some friends instantly switch to annunaki or alien explanations. I say why not? But they say no no … no metaphysical, only physical from other worlds.

Again I say … why not aliens? If there are angels, if there’s an evil entity, then why not other things too? What’s this mania to deny, just because that person can’t hsndle the alternative? I place that under the same heading as brainwashed Woke lefties being utterly incapable of seeing truth. Same deep denial.

All right, onto this lady … Cheere Denise. Toodles has sent her a few times. I like her no BS personality … she is trying to find out, to know. Yes, she is of the Triune faith too. Anyway, she can do the talking from this point forward:

https://youtu.be/SbYXxp05Cr4?is=Vbc11UwGJS-HdybQ

Grrrrrr … seems embedding disabled, which is a bit off.

Which brings me to the topic of “women” as a study. I’ve had a long and close connection with women and girls and while there are clear limitations to the ladies … flying performance aircraft, designing bridges, following maps, being chancellor of the exchequer … there is also the very womanly side which I also know, can even feel inside … a sixth sense? An intuition? It’s very real and why not? Why would it not be? We’re androgen, they’re estrogen, XY v XX etc. etc.

They’re different creatures to us men … they can sense things we can’t. Yes, their minds are often all over the place but none of that negates this other sense with them. And today, one rape gang girl was trying to explain the Stockholm. Heck … if I, a mere man can see that, why can the rest of my species not see it?

Tomorrow, Fri 1, I go into things people should NOT be dabbling in, not any which way. Just before 14 minutes into the video above, they ARE dabbling and are consequentially threatening human existence. END PART ONE.

16. The end of regular posts, next … onto the weird things


15. Screw


14. Double Brian Cates


13. The enemy’s apparatchiki

(Keep an eye on tag … most impressive, relatively new.)


12. Water supply


11. This is beyond criminal in America

Thursday [6 to 10]

(1215) Afternoon all … promise I’ve not been slacking, snoozing etc., been gathering films, classical music, numbering at NOWP, conversing. That’s why it takes so long to get to n10 item on the day. (1233)

 

10. Moo corner


9. That gathering of material mentioned above


8. Save Europe Act

Typical EU reaction:


7. A John Redwood double


6. DAD at 1446

Url is over there.

A complete dossier on Miatta Fahnbulleh is currently undergoing final verification. Early findings are devastating. Full breakdown dropping soon.

What we can confirm: 

THE DICTATOR’S DAUGHTER – Her father served as Foreign Minister to Liberian military dictator Samuel Doe, the butcher who seized power in a violent coup, executed the President, and presided over mass killings and torture. Grandfather convicted of treason for coup-plotting. The bloodline is regime change. 

THE MILIBAND PROTÉGÉ – She was Ed Miliband’s economics adviser during his failed leadership. The “brains” behind his agenda. Now she’s back, running energy policy for Burnham.

ETC.

Thursday [2 to 5]

(0744) Seem to be using the word “frenetic” a lot lately but this 0530 to 0930 period has everything hitting at the same time. Twenty-four snippets in one hit? Then it at least fades for a while … brekky time … and I have to check on close people. Not in the least complaining, it’s good in fact. Just had to spring DAD from comment prison … must have a look now why. (1108)

 

5. The value of self-control


4. This Natalie Fleet creature


Just ask yourself (rhetorical as you already have been) … how on God’s earth is someone like young Ms Fleet even remotely qualified to be in charge of censoring our posts and tweets! Answer of course is she is not, therefore she does what the monsters tell her to do.

3. Let’s look at this Magyar issue


2. DAD at 1446

a) French Lawmaker Chenu proposes referendum to ban Isl@mic veil. France’s Rassemblement National proposes a referendum to ban Isl@mic veils in public spaces, using direct democracy to maintain a symbolic pledge while avoiding internal disputes and implementation details.

b) In a recent vote in the National Assembly, MPs from La France Insoumise laid bare their views on justice, the protection of the most vulnerable and their hierarchy of priorities. By proposing to remove the possibility of imposing a life sentence ….

c) ROBERT BATES: I’ve used every method available to get Labour to reveal the real number of serious crimes committed by migrants in Britain. Now, they’re taking legal action to block me… it’s a complete cover-up.

d) Maria Rosander, [a veteran Swedish police officer] who has served in the police for 17 years and leads the national-conservative Sweden Democrats in Uppsala County, said ….

e) Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni is seeking to contain outrage over the death of Moroccan-born Abderrahim Fakir during a police arrest in Bologna, while resisting efforts to condemn officers before the evidence is known….

Thursday [1]

(0656) Morning all … dull out there. Page for July here. (0658)

Awash in a sea of anomalous snippets

If you look at the sea of voting normies out there, so easily gulled with the MSM as their main source, with various forms of entertainment as distractions, their welcome relief, let alone contending the simple worry, in the face of a govt looking for any pretext at all to tax or steal them to oblivion … in any western country …

… whose idea of cutting edge political “discussion” is BBCQT or C4 … then I’m not trying in any way to be a smarta**e because I’ve been messing up big time myself in the field of ladies … but perhaps I’m one of a growing band of observers.

And as observers on soc-med, we get to know … we get to work out the good ones such as Charlotte Gill or Brian Cates now and then.

So we see snippets, the topic of this post, moreso than a journo-prepared pap piece (the way we’re meant to think embedded in the subtext).

In short, we are seeing anomalies whoosh past us in our timelines and there’s just too much of it to handle in one go.

Take, for example, Mike Lindell, of pillow fame … great supporter of the Donald pre-election … one of the good guys, no?


That’s as it should be … in a functioning society.

But we’re not in a functioning society … we’re under a bunch of paid, psycho clowns who obey the money.

Was your first question, “Who’s Mike Lindell?” And why would that be your first question? Is it because you’re focussed almost entirely on Brit news or World Cup or food shopping or your workplace or light relief?

So somewhere along the line, we start picking up on snippets, often random, esp. on X, the premier platform in 2026, hence the govt wants it banned from the country. Along comes Natalie Fleet who’s just resigned … (heard of her ? look her up) … her job being to restrict what you can view.

Whoops, a snippet flew by … Viktor Orban starting a Magyar resistance against this Peter Magyar, the Hungarian version of controlled opposition type Farage who has everyone gulled on this “don’t split the vote” pap … welcome Burnham, all blame Lowe.

And that’s where we are. Long ago, I was often quoting Perry Mason from one of those books, speaking to a Sgt Holcombe on the stand. Mason asked what happens when you sometimes see pieces of evidence which don’t accord with the general trend of the “evidence”? Awkward snippets in other words.

And Holcombe said: “You ignore em.”

How many people come onto dissident soc-med and bring their MSM habits with them? That is … find a comfortable show which seems to say all the right things, e.g. Mike Graham … and get one’s reality from that limited look?

Instead of actually investigating and building up impossible vaults of snippets, then losing them over time?

Let’s face it … we here do the best we can on these blogs to get issues to readers … multi-author is better … but the very best require a news organisation with a fleet of reporters which none of us can afford in either time or money … either energy or inclination. How many of us are, essentially, lazy bstds, easily jaded or bored?

Have a wunnerful Thursday, good readers all.

Wednesday [16 till close of play]

(1532) A long way from evening but let’s start.

 

21. Well well well

Recipient of the coveted NOWP comments award goes to our Steve for his MftWC 1 … yay! It’s the site’s 15,000th comment … how bout that!


It’s a bit of a mixed bag … HQ has 6718 comments just now, while NOWP has been going, I think, since 2009. Still, congrats, Steve … your award is a weekend at Bernie’s.

20. Moo corner


19. Atmosphere


18. The Falklands and Maggie

Please see Toodles at one of these two:

| https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2026/07/of-maggie-and-falkland-islands.html

| https://jameshigham.substack.com/p/of-maggie-and-the-falkland-islands

Then:


17. A direct view


16. IYE has Leah

… and Steve has Sarah Rogers. It’s up to the chaps if they want it at NOWP or even here at:

|https://unherdablecats.com/july-22nd/

We do have options.

Wed Mat

 

Yesterday, not everyone immediately understood that when I write the innocuous:

HERE

… that it might be something worth seeing. You see, right now, I’m going back through the Unherdables posts and if it’s any good, it’s usually in a different format, only viewable from that older post.