(0244GMT) Middle of the night here. (0404GMT) That was 0344 to 0504 by the way, BST.

 

”Unherdable cats” is not just some random expression

There’s a clip on X or a youtube short, can’t remember … such “can’t remember” due to a combination of age, health … itself due to a recurrence of heart and gastric … and who knows what part chemtrail poisoning and food additives play … … … where was I?

Point is, there are so many factors in play to wreck our pleasant western life that we might even be in agreement on most … but not on all … and it just takes one of those we disagree over to end a relationship … my thinking is what chance anyone can get along with anyone at all? For any length of time? Unless ordained by God of course.

That clip I opened this post mentioning … it was cats in a room and to state the bleedin’ obvious … cats and dogs are quite different in manner, though they both need feeding and in the dogs’ case … walkies. The cats are quite self-centred … conditional love when they’re ready only, otherwise claws out … dogs are far more faithful, even unto the death of dog or master.

A pundit at a site like this cannot possibly meet everyone’s key criteria, nor can any site do that. My mate up the road (henceforth MMUTR) said it’s better to stay single issue, maybe two or three and so pundit and visitor are at one because they do not pursue a plethora of issues.

Nourishing Unherdables, an umbrella term, explores a whole range of issues, dunnit, and in so doing, does not satisfy those intolerant of issues other than their own hobbyhorses … whilst at the same time, it only takes the slightest whiff of anathema ideas and positions to him/her and that person will take bat and ball and go. It happened at Orphans around 2013 when I quoted Ephesians 6:12 … that did it and one of the founders took bat and ball and a whole swathe of left libertarians with him.

I followed the fortunes of the libertarian party and they fell apart as well … one was a right libertarian, into the rule of law, another a do as thou wilt devil’s bathroom type … I sat back, watching, thinking how the hell can anyone anti-statist and pro-ordinary people possibly get along for long enough to achieve anything whatever?

The so-called left don’t have that problem … at least they do in the Monty Python’s Life of Brian sense of the People’s Front of Judaea versus the Judaean People’s Front (splitters!) and note how I spelt that word Judaea … or is it Judea … and do we refer to God or G-d? You do see how all this goes, yes?

Anne Marie Waters … or is it Ann-Marie Waters … had a nice dissident-right thing going from Lewisham, Cleverly’s old stomping ground, not far from my own home … but it fell apart over her insistence on rainbow politics, a movement killer if ever there was one … I notice Aldi have included it in their logo now so that’s me gone, also Tesco. And my bank insists that every single customer must be black, except black man/white lover … quite acceptable to the PTB, that is … plus my own stance on that has lost me friends … Julia’s and my view is “get a room, would you, don’t inflict your sexuality on us in public” nor your pit bully dogs either.

Now, IYE was strongly anti-paedo and symbolism-aware … or is that anti-pedo … some will say we want no Americanisms here, thanks, take their bat and ball and go, which will offend our American bros and sisses … and don’t call them bros … they’re brothers, all right? And don’t say Ok … use the Queen’s English, will ye?

Phew!

Sometimes, it’s just that we don’t emphasise … or is that emphasize … a particular position often enough or strongly enough for a reader … and that’s before even getting onto Jews/Arabs and the words seemingly getting DAD into hot water two days ago … and what about the Chinese by the way?

What does Jimbo the Admin do? Tries to cover all bases, yes (oh wot an American giveaway there … and stop that pseudo-vernacular, would you … and stop splitting words with dashes) … ? … !

Phew again.

What does the admonition “be reasonable” mean? Does it mean compromising our dearly held belief? Whenever I drop into Gab with its strong Christian overtones (Catholic versus Protestant versus Evangelical left versus Orthodox), there is much there identifying the one single cause of unrest as the secret and not so secret Ashkenazi Zionism. Does that mean all Jews are evil muvvers? What of the other Semitic peoples in that region in the M-E?

The Nethan yahoos most certainly want to expand their “buffer zone” to include Gaza, Jordan, Iraq … the Russians, at a minimum , want their Donbass and buffers below, the Chinese want Taiwan and Tibet, Mongolia, even Siberia, France wants La Manche for fishing, Britain is giving everything once theirs away for free and importing the third world … oops, what did I just say?

What chance any of us can get along … at all … for any length of time … before something or other anathema offends us?

All right … what’s the Rogan approach? Big umbrella, innit? He’ll hear someone out, is sure to put some curly questions to satisfy the other side … which it won’t, nothing ever satisfies ideologues with single purpose communism as their goal, top down … and yet he does change the media paradigm somewhat … both he and Tucker have heavy-hitters as guests … why then does Rogan reach more?

I had to draw a line in the sand here at nourishing unherdables and a good line seemed to be Wokery, with its exponents the Wokerati and karens. But it still strains at the seams, it still never quite satisfies, plus the head honcho, pretending he’s not, still has strong views on many things.

Look what happened to the Z Man … he was dominating like Last Refuge for awhile … then he expressed things too RINO for the dissident, disgruntled majority, of which I’m one. Where is he now? Milo? Where’s Milo now? Alex Jones? Breitbart? Breitbart had Raheem, do you remember? Twas good in those days.

This could go on forever, so I’ll stop, as the DAD drop might be arriving soon.