(0309) It’s going to take some time. Cunning plan is to post the first part of this, switch to UHC-WP in order to fulfil my promise there too, various correspondence, then try to grab a few hours more kip, before a gruelling Monday. (0631) Back again.
ddddd
2. This is but one symptom
There’s almost complete misinterpretation, imho, of a remark such as “they should not be dressed as 304s” because the western reaction is that “they should be able to go alone anywhere and looking like whatever they want”, which is not the point here.
The long and short is that females are sexual creatures and the only ways to turn off predatory males is either dress in bin bags, the Moose Limb way … or dress in old style fashion with flowing robes, supported by a code of chivalry the everpresent males would adhere to, for fear of ostracism and the big No from females … or dress in a bit looser gear than the glorified ubiquitous tights of today, again with the support structure of yesteryear.
Plus no filth masquerading as sex ed in schools, with govts acting against parents in that and the mutilations etc. … in short, govt stays out of it and women wake up that they’re heavily promoting their own dangerous environment … and the only way they wake up is that the Jed Bilas now flooding the net are able, en masse, to influence young ladies, make headway … plus the pron industry goes offline … but the only way that can succeed is that the exodus of good males from influence and support roles is reversed …
… and the only way for that is that the statecdeases hammering white males, joining divorce filers in taking white males to the cleaners, plus girls are taught by sane women again, not feminazis so that men cease being armies of predators and simps or resentful “cross the road to avoid women” sigmas … plus the very worst women are no longer promoted to jobs they’re unsuited for.
I wrote in a post called Cry Rape around 2009 that if that continued, that deterioration, then male-female relations would deteriorate to the point of total enmity and who’d protect the females then?
And that was before the mass invasion had got to this point today.
Plus the total sexualisation of kids from an early age destroys any form of respect for anything … perfect monsters in the making.
Will the CK thing change it? The CK effect? Are Lola and Ruby Moir any safer? Or has everyone forgotten about it? Where are girls’ fathers? Why?
1. Honouring the funeral, memorial, family and country
… plus possibilities for the world. What Erika Kirk said and did, plus JD Vance saying he’d spoken more about Jesus Christ in the past two weeks than he had before in his career … it filled a need.
Right … so “nourishing unherdables”, the HQ of the combined sites, has made its statement. However, there are certainly anomalies of detail and the appropriate place for those is over at UHC-WP, both in a post about to go up, plus under “Redacted” in the sidebar, which includes IYE’s remarks.