(0309) It’s going to take some time. Cunning plan is to post the first part of this, switch to UHC-WP in order to fulfil my promise there too, various correspondence, then try to grab a few hours more kip, before a gruelling Monday. (0631) Back again. (0715)
3. Here’s a starting point
Until the sleazebags in parlmt go, driven out by the common people, severely punished for their behaviour, in some sort of massed pushback on the Woke left … then any gains are but lip service, fleeting, sticking plasters.
2. This is but one symptom
There’s almost complete misinterpretation, imho, of a remark such as “they should not be dressed as 304s” because the western reaction is that “they should be able to go alone anywhere and looking like whatever they want”, which is not the point here.
The long and short is that females are sexual creatures and the only ways to turn off predatory males is either dress in bin bags, the Moose Limb way … or dress in old style fashion with flowing robes, supported by a code of chivalry the everpresent males would adhere to, for fear of ostracism and the big No from females … or dress in a bit looser gear than the glorified ubiquitous tights of today, again with the support structure of yesteryear.
Plus no filth masquerading as sex ed in schools, with govts acting against parents in that and the mutilations etc. … in short, govt stays out of it and women wake up that they’re heavily promoting their own dangerous environment … and the only way they wake up is that the Jed Bilas now flooding the net are able, en masse, to influence young ladies, make headway … plus the pron industry goes offline … but the only way that can succeed is that the exodus of good males from influence and support roles is reversed …
… and the only way for that is that the statecdeases hammering white males, joining divorce filers in taking white males to the cleaners, plus girls are taught by sane women again, not feminazis so that men cease being armies of predators and simps or resentful “cross the road to avoid women” sigmas … plus the very worst women are no longer promoted to jobs they’re unsuited for.
I wrote in a post called Cry Rape around 2009 that if that continued, that deterioration, then male-female relations would deteriorate to the point of total enmity and who’d protect the females then?
And that was before the mass invasion had got to this point today.
Plus the total sexualisation of kids from an early age destroys any form of respect for anything … perfect monsters in the making.
Will the CK thing change it? The CK effect? Are Lola and Ruby Moir any safer? Or has everyone forgotten about it? Where are girls’ fathers? Why?
1. Honouring the funeral, memorial, family and country
… plus possibilities for the world. What Erika Kirk said and did, plus JD Vance saying he’d spoken more about Jesus Christ in the past two weeks than he had before in his career … it filled a need.
Right … so “nourishing unherdables”, the HQ of the combined sites, has made its statement. However, there are certainly anomalies of detail and the appropriate place for those is over at UHC-WP, both in a post about to go up, plus under “Redacted” in the sidebar, which includes IYE’s remarks.
MM updated his post on CK
…[Added September 21: A TPUSA spokesman has now tried to explain part of that by claiming there
was no exit wound because the coroner found the bullet lodged in Kirk’s neck. Really? That’s what
they’re going with? Then through what hole did all that blood squirt out? A large pore? An old
pimple? You get a blood squirt like that out of an exit hole. I guess they expect you to believe the
blood came out of the entry hole, but that isn’t how it works, and the squirt is on the wrong side
anyway. The natural assumption, given the video, was that the bullet came from your left, exiting on
your right. That’s why he was pushed right and fell right, and why the squirt was right. So this is
ballistics for the clueless….]
It is on page 7 of the pdf
https://mileswmathis.com/kirk.pdf
I’ve read the piece, IYE. There’s a lot to take in but this did interest me:
‘But this is all almost beside the point, since there was no gun, no shooter, and no death.’
The day it happened I was online and saw a video of the apparent murder of Charlie Kirk – the view looking toward the stage from just left of centre and slightly above: someone positioned on the slope. Charlie was sat down listening to a question when you hear the crack/thump of a high velocity bullet. The crack is the bullet breaking the sound barrier and the thump is the bullet being fired. That’s why you never hear the bullet that kills you because the bullet is ahead of both sounds. A bullet was fired so there was a ‘gun’ and guns need a ‘shooter’. As for Charlie’s death on some aspects I’m open to persuasion but a bullet through the carotid artery would immediately cease his cognitive function: unconsciousness then death. People can survive a bullet to the brain but not to the artery that feeds it.
That is a far too logical explaination for some people, Steve.