(0131)(0316)
5. This was from Newsmax
”My perception of the supreme Court depends almost entirely on how much Barrett allows herself to be pushed around or influenced by Roberts. Both of those justices are huge disappointments. Barrett is reminding me of Chief Justice Warren Berger, who had been appointed to the appellate court by Ike. Later to the Supreme Court by Nixon. I recall and interview with him when he said he had gone in as someone from the right. But has he saw the court swinging that direction, he moved left to balance the court. He is a huge reason why Roe v Wade ever passed in the first place, despite it being an awful piece of legislation. Barrett has already indicated the same belief, that she feels she almost needs to be a swing vote because she sees the cord becoming too conservative. My question is, when you are nominated based on a set of principles that you put forth, why is it so hard to stick to those. It’s why you were put on the court in the first place. Instead it looks like that she is a moldable piece of Play-Doh. The reality of it is, you either have principles or you don’t. I know that that is an oxymoron in Congress. But I’ve always hoped that steadfastness existed in the SCOTUS. Unfortunately I have been proven wrong too many times.”
In Roberts’s case, there is the Epstein Island flightlog situation, is there not? Motivation plus. We shall soon see. 🍿🍿🍿
4. A plea on X by a distressed westerner
“So it appears that there is a fresh murder spree every single day in Europe. Douglas Murray was right, and before him, Enoch Powell foresaw this. Europe is dying. Our women and children have been thrown like sacrificial lambs to the slaughter, all for the sick ideological goal of open borders, mass uncontrolled immigration and the death of sovereign nation states. We must stop this suicidal madness now, close the borders, and enforce deportations and remigrations by the millions. Then we take back our homes, our towns and cities and our countries. The globalists are destroying us. We need to wake up and fight back to defend ourselves from this evil onslaught.”
3. Child rape victim fighting back
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/11981/11981d2608a6865806d41f2765765f247dd9984e" alt=""
2. Grossly offensive era
Ohio Democrats Propose Ridiculous “Conception Begins at Erection” Bill (969:8) … in other words, three fundamental principles violated:
a. The classical liberal principle that we’re free to do, say, think, worship as we wish, providing there’s no demonstrable harm to others, the issue of course being who the arbiters are of that. It used to be biblical, e.g. Ten Commandments, as reinforced by judges but that’s now in the hands of far left activists and they are wrecking …
b. Public taste and ethics for a start … even the very question of truth and promises.
c. The very notion of reality being aligned with reality. At some point, the overwhelming consensus needs to be what prevailed before this current insane era. For example … mammalian life being the fertilisation of the egg, at latest first heartbeat, which then frames the definition of murder … which of course depends on consensus again but based on what? Different multicultural societies overwhelming a culturally Christian population?
d. Which leads to force and war, slaughter, rule by the militarily strongest.
e. Which of course defeats the Rule of Law, of protection of the vulnerable. Lawless societies cheek by jowl … new dark ages.
All the above is “a thing” or “thang” as they say in America … a set of considerations … but the one out of all of those uppermost in my mind is having to even face, see, confront, that which I see as offensive. In fact, even having to debate that Ohio bill is grossly offensive in my mind … there must be either a retreat for those wanting a halfway decent public space, there being all sorts of perversions rampant in that society … which is a Sodom and Gomorrah situation, even Jericho …
… which is completely unacceptable … or else some form of decency in the public space, e.g. a dress code … and those not adhering are welcome to get a room, as long as only consenting adults … in my view over 21, are involved … and under no demonstrable coercion to be there. As for children … no way known, whether willing or not.
For me, personally, I’ve just reported a Japanese ad at NOWP to ggl ads. I do NOT wish to have to see anything gross like close-ups of body parts, sick or flabby, such ads infesting any conservative news outlet today, all over the page and between paragraphs. The GWP is just such a one and that’s the only reason I refuse to click on it.
But it’s more than that … whilst I can still go about the day to day without confronting filth … if I did wish to, then I’d have to click in or rather would have to second click after a warning … then I can survive, mentally. The completely out of order is having to see vile poster ads in the underground or that vile Hirst statue on a hillside or anything like that.
Also in that category are the white environment killers the wind farms (see 969:5) … grossly offensive to a significant portion of the population.
1. Steve at 969
Four: Trump and Putin Name Their High-Level Peace Negotiation Teams … Saudi Arabia to host summit … another jihad murder … much more…..
Three: Trump and Musk … Federal Judge Rules in Favor of DOGE … National Energy Dominance Council … DEI contracts … much more…..
Two: Uke sit-rep … Vance in Munich … Uke not in NATO, NATO still wants in Uke … more…..
One: “Green energy” harm … US weapons for Uke end up with cartels … Candace … more…..