(0931)(1059)
13. Taking one issue and running with it
… does not have to mean to the exclusion of the other vital things going on … have just posted on Carney, people like the Warburgs, the Fed, about false supporters of popular causes when they themselves are secretly involved … the stealing of elections, the alphabet agencies … and so on.
One of the key issues is:

The moment my demographic tries to support the Sams and Sammies and WSI … well, let me put it this way … my next door neighbour and I were talking about the same demographic Sam above was, the one we’re all concerned about. She very quickly, very sharply pointed out that it was not just that lot, the throwbacks … there were other demographics too (knowing stare into my eyes) who also come onto girls. I quite agreed, I don’t come onto her, she was hot under the collar about it … rightly I think.
Then we get this:

Rape victims versus Woke left young women, brainwashed in school, college, the MSM, in entertainment etc. … includes the nose ring and painted hair set. Where’s a place for my demographic there? I can’t see that we’re wanted in that discussion. And yet we must come out in support of these abused girls … we must not stay shtum on it.
Two decades ago, I was on about Alisha Owen, Paul Bonacci and the Franklin child prostitution ring, still a live issue by the way, plus the Belgian child abuse, plus Dolphin Square … all still live … plus the Jersey Care Home … it goes on. In the 80s I think it was, there was a Brit TV series which involved a policeman befriending a girl who’d appealed to him … he then had her, just like the rest. I’m thinking they pulled the series or at least it disappeared.
So what should pundits of our demographic do? Stay quiet, avoid the issue, esp. as it came out some days back that the Brit police were just as much into the girls as any of them?
12. Canada down the gurgler


11. Durham Appendix