Monday [16 to 20]

(1337) Afternoon all. Steve’s fifth part (of four) is up on X (1513)

 

20. Moosh corner


19. Spitfire


18. Interesting


17. Steve at 1151

  • Teacher Suspended After Forcing 10 Year-Olds to Repeatedly Watch Graphic Charlie Kirk Assassination Video in Class (JH: Only suspended?)
  • Thousands of South Koreans March in Support of Charlie Kirk
  • Relative Spills on Lance Twiggs’ Relationship with Charlie Kirk Assassin
  • UK/EU Alarm; Trump Signals US Sanctions Retreat, Ignores Drones
  • Tommy Robinson: Westminster Council revoked the licence for Unite the Kingdom rally (JH: Police agreed though)
  • Department of War to Purge Military of Treasonous Servicemen Celebrating Kirk’s Death
  • Much more.

16. IYE with Miles Mathis and Andy with Static


That was a lot of reading … I needed a film in order to do it … start with IYE in the sidebar, then Andy at 1151:9 and follow whichever links from there seem important. There are anomalies for sure which it seems it’s Miles pointing out but look at this:

That suggests to me that someone else wrote it … or else he just quoted MM. Who?

Now, Andy’s chap’s contention I commented on over there.

What comes out of it? I’m thinking MM’s general thesis is not wrong, that which I’ve read … not sure if he’s nailed all claims of staged. For example, a tweet appeared showing an angle shot with a girl with a gun in her hand, pointed vaguely at CK. She’s near the stage, right front corner. Obviously how? What security was about?

About this stage, I was getting birth certificate vibes … that is, so many anomalies not adding up, way too many. As for CK … too Jewish, too easy to access, almost as if we the sceptics were the ones being played. The Saturday church was too obvious … besides, any real Christian knows the Resurrection did away with the shabbat on Saturday, the sacrifices.

And so it goes on.

One reply

  1. 16. Tell me you didn’t read it without telling me you didn’t read it!
    It states quite clearly that one of MM’s readers contributed parts of that paper.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *