(0323) One of these middle-of-the-nighters. May as well tackle the CK and related issues.

 

False flags, false heroes, false prophets … plus true ones

Were we to use a continuum of just how much vehemence we should bring to bear, it’s difficult to show on just the one chart.

We could, for example, say ra ra ra, yes all for conservatism, as in rid ourselves of public violence and loss of morality, ruinous govt policies, loss of our cultural underpinnings and promote family, sound learning, civility etc. etc. and I’d say we’re maybe 52%-48% for that, as in the 2016 Brexit referendum … those sorts of numbers over the Wokerati and globopsycho … some might say as high as 65%-35%.

That’s a workable percentage for getting a large majority behind an idea … some will come over. Trouble with getting behind the CK idea itself which is sweeping the world is that people are backing it for different reasons, for their own agendas.

There were two key tenets to CK, to what he was teaching-preaching … one was the conservative economy and living style, with a very much Christian element … hence his close people saying get to a church yesterday. The other was about listening and arguing with opposing views in debate, esp. brainwashed views in the young.

The problem with churchgoing now is that major hierarchical churches have been overrun, taken over, at Synod level, by Wokery … we saw it with that woman “pastor” with DJT and entourage in the congregation. What exactly is now being taught within those buildings, even the Vatican with its Chicago socialist boss?

There’s also a clip doing the rounds, in which CK is expounding, he mentions the big Z or I and Shapiro’s eyebrows go up, his expression is wooden for the rest of the speech, AIPAC and Mossad would have quietly made a decision then. For in the world of faiths, this was pure Jesus versus the Pharisees. The Pharisaic intransigence was also found in Galatians between the internationalist Paul and orthodox Peter. Yet deep Christians keep insisting on Daniel and Isaiah, other books too for understanding.

And confusing it further was the Assyrian/Babylonian takeover of the two kingdoms of Judaea and Israel back in the mists of history. Plus the Khazars and Ashkenazis, the pagan influence.

In the world of politics, this being a political, not a religious blog, its chief cook and bottle washer is still “privately” Christian, while those such as Steve mention cultural Christianity. I look at tweets from Christian Xers ranging from “moderate stance”, past the basic Triune God and Gospels basis, to fanatical vehemence for their own denomination they call the One True Church. To be fanatically denominational, down to the pageantry and ritual, enables events such as the St Bartholomew’s Day massacre, the Great Schism itself. Also thinking of Ian Paisley versus the Papists. Is that what Jesus as the Christ would want?

So we keep coming back to this issue of: “How far are your allies actually with you? What will they fall out with you over?”

Mix in Scientism (the Science is established shtick), agnosticism, atheism, humanism (Man is God) and we do have an interesting mix. Pour in Wokery taught to children, with its perverted sexuality and moral bankruptcy, whilst believing, those Wokerati, that they’re God’s gift to the west, then pour in the deathcult and its agenda, China and its agenda … and what then of the Russkies?

Then look north and west in these isles at paganism, Wicca, at the Wicker Man on a northern isle, mix in godless Gnosis, mix in Old Boggy on Lammas Eve, mix in the Indians and Hinduism, Buddhism … think you’re getting the drift. People acting primarily from their own hobbyhorse.

Even here at UHC, posts are dropped stemming from contributors’ own reading, often opposed reading … how could it be any different?

So … therefore … what’s the point of this blog? Well yesterday and the day before, there was very much a “oneness” at large, worldwide, vehemently opposed by the Wokerati, plus their gurus, globopsycho. Phew … but it certainly was.

And so to my conversation yesterday with MMutR, he being primarily a libertarian rationalist old-style techie … it was productive. Did we think Iryna K was actually knifed? He thought possible but look what tech can do today, let alone editing. I pointed out that her body position did not seem right. We put that one aside.

Was CK shot? Well yes. By a professional? We agreed that 200 yards was not difficult. We did not fully discuss multiple shooters … I note this morning that others are likening it to 1968 as well as 1963.

We did not quite get onto the violent troon factor … this looming large just now on X.

What do fellow pundits think of Saturday? Resounding success overall, festive occasion, nation reborn, celebrated by other nations … Americans were delighted that Britain refound their spine. Other nationalities spoke on stage … I was personally happy with that, e.g. Eva … it reinforced how much goodwill there is, how much similar thought in the other western nations … that could only be good in my book. It debunks the Wokerati and their puppetmasters the globopsycho, esp, in Westminster and Whitehall.

Notably absent was Reform, officially, who will nevertheless reap the rewards of that great day out … they’ll reap it at the ballot box. I hasten to add that the Reform honchos were absent … many, many Reform rank and file were there though as fellow Brits or pro-Brit.

Thanks again, Steve, for the paragraph accounts … shall wait a couple of hours for Brits to be awake and attem, otherwise they’d be swamped in the early morning flurry on X.

Violence in the streets, door to door? MMutR thought yes, inevitable, given violent, intransigent agendas against us. I threw in that “moderation in war is imbecility”, taken from an Oxford quote.

We mentioned how easily the Russkies adjust to austerity … read Donny’s further sanctions which, incidentally, this morning, early, he’s said to have walked back from. I mentioned that non-Russkies will never, ever defeat Russia per se … they go scorched earth. MMutR said that while we (e.g northern cultural Americans) are upset if a fave food is not available, the Russkies adjust, eat something different.