(1116) Fairly packed programme today, so need to run this now. Following this, Ladies at Lunchtime interesting edition, the film with a twist, followed by more politics. (1124)
IYE and all things royal
JH: reposting this from Thursday 17:
Hazbeen Mountbatten Whinger’s visa case docs reveal.
Not necessarily a nothing burger.
These two sections mentioned
INA 212 (d)(3)
https://www.uscis.gov/policy-manual/volume-9-part-o-chapter-4
And
INA 212 (a)(10)(c)
https://messersmithlaw.com/ina-212a10c/
My ‘umble is the powers that think they are are protecting the twosome’s first sprog who is an innocent in this debacle.
JH: And today:
I’ve come back to this because I’ve got a bit more. Sometimes info comes to me from unexpected sources. This I got from a comment by Our Recollections May Vary on her community page on YT. The first 16 mins 52 secs is the part I’m highlighting. The rest (cartomancy) is not relevant, imho.
{I am surprised that TRG was so dismissive of the visa case and didn’t dig in as she usually does}