Another Friday the 13th [6 to 10]

(0832) The morning rolls on. (1019)

 

10. Moo corner


9. Bank note suggestions


8. Are these ladies too hasty?


Are they too hasty or do they have it right? I saw the latest where she was propped up by Sarah Huckabee … it was photo op by numbers … 1. Smile 2. Show emotion 3. Talk merch 4. Strike a humble pose.

Maybe she’s innocent, just no social awareness, unfortunate shape and movement, way of speaking … but there’s a mass of material before even getting to the CK killing and aftermath. I keep coming back to her dealings with Epcompany and there being something “not right” about her.

7. Stupidity or just unaware yet?

Through my teaching years, did I see the chn as “dumb”? Of course not … they were at a certain cognitive age, with certain background knowledge by that stage. We all learn, or should learn, all our lives.

There’s a good argument that “dumb” does not mean errors, it means learning nothing from them.

Yes, that one has legs but what if the average normie is prevented from gaining knowledge? In fact, official subterfuge is used to ensure that wrong, ideological non-realities flood the cognitive of space, e.g. through tele … here’s an example:


That’s fine, Sadie, as long as the 85% are even aware of our 15% in a non-hostile, non weasel word way, plus maybe 37% “out of” that 85% are already disgruntled about things = 52%, which was the winning percentage in the 2016 Referendum. Reform are within that 37%, many saying they’d never voted before.

Restore are therefore dangerous to the PTB if that 37% can get hold of genuine info. Which is where Elon and X come in for a start, Rumble too, Gab to a point. Then it becomes word of mouth.

6. The Daily Sceptic corner

Will Jones on the new Khomanei clown:

Firstly, he seems to have misplaced a leg and is in a coma. Then this:

“Worth reading in full:

This is the problem with Islamist fanatics like those in charge in Iran. They aren’t rational like most leaders, who would recognise when they are beaten and seek the best peace terms they can. They believe they are on a divine mission – to wipe out Israel, among other things – so would rather their entire country was laid waste and its people slaughtered than surrender. With no sign of the emergence of an internal armed resistance to the Iranian regime, it’s hard to see how anything short of a ground invasion could topple the zealots – and Iraq shows us how that kind of operation can end up: stuck for decades in a bloody and costly nation-building enterprise.”

I’d broaden that to any kind of fanatic over anything, e.g. Milliband or Starmer. One aspect is how it came about in the first place. Was it a Damascene moment or lifelong upbringing?

Every culture on earth has children growing up with its society’s values … the issue is whether those values require you to maim or kill other societal groups or not. The Christian, as in biblical, as in New Testament, clearly does not get us to kill Mussies or Jews … unless they threaten our own families of course. Tolerance of them doing that is not just insanity, a lack of logic … it’s evil, sick.

6 replies on “Another Friday the 13th [6 to 10]”

  1. A colleague asked why Trump and Israel attacked Iran ad, “they were in negotiations”. I tried to explain that it’s difficult to negotiate with people to whom the word “taquiyya” (it is permissible, or even encouraged to lie, to deceive your enemy, if that lie furthers the cause of islam) is a major part of their culture. Perhaps the Iranian government had no intention of building nuclear weapons, or perhaps they had every intent, and looked upon western negotiations as a sign of weakness. Depending on who wins this war, we may never know, or we will know as our world burns.

    ……

    JH: 🍿🍿🍿🍿

  2. 8. Just look at her eyes. They’re the window of the soul. Enough for me to give this woman a wide berth.

  3. And into the mod bin. Which words triggered that? Eyes, windows, soul, wide berth?
    🙄

    ……

    JH: The thlot pickens.

  4. #10: oh naughty Hob.

    #9 Missing? Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, James Watt, Joseph Swan, Lord Kelvin, Ernest Rutherford (one Kiwi allowed), Sir Walter Scott, Burns, Napier of Merchiston, Turner, Constable, David Hume, Adam Smith, Cap’n Cook, Thomas Telford, Bill Slim, Marlborough, Robert Adam, Capability Brown, Turnip Townsend, Pitt the Younger, Wilberforce, Dr Johnson, Thomas Carlyle, Macaulay, Kipling, Milton, Edmund Burke (two Irish allowed) … Elgar? Handel (one Kraut allowed). Wordsworth. Grace Darling.

    Medical men? Harvey. Lister, maybe? Simpson? Snow? Jenner? Dame Cicely Saunders?

    Lawyers/judges? Certainly not.

    How about the textile men: John Kay (Flying Shuttle), James Hargreaves (Spinning Jenny), Richard Arkwright (Water Frame), Samuel Crompton (Spinning Mule), and Edmund Cartwright (Power Loom)? Or some other engineers e.g. Whitworth, Armstrong, or Brunel’s dad? Whittle? Barnes Wallis? R.J. Mitchell? Sir Sydney Camm?

    ……

    JH: What would you suggest I tell Moo, DM?

Leave a Reply to In yer ear Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *