(0845)(0925)

 

15. The Seditious Six

14. Online Safety crime

13. Censorship … scenario one

There’ll be a second later. Let’s say I want to see Slotkin and Kelly hanged for slightly different reasons and I post on their “treason”. Commenter says it’s not treason, the oath is to the Constitution.

This is what it actually says: “US forces swear a solemn oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States, to bear true faith and allegiance to it, and to obey the orders of their superior officers and the President. This oath is not to an individual, but to the country’s founding document and the laws and leadership of the United States.”

He sort of deliberately left the rest of it out, damaging his statement. Now, my approach as admin is threefold … first of all, it must be longterm legal, e.g. no porn, must be free of copyright … then it must be correct in its facts. As in the oath: I swear to tell the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth … obviously it can only be as far as I know.

The third is defamation and I see that in two sections … first is between “us”, the regulars, here … if we are addressing the issue rather than the person, weeeellll, all right, just keep it civil. Second is an occasional or stumble-upon, particularly if a known hostile, e.g. Wokerati … these are usually shut out anyway but on this topic, I made a statement about treason, he replied shadily, leaving out the core parts.

So I reply, quoting the US Code core clauses, e.g. §2387. MMutR, as a libertarian, says that after a post, there must be room for comment and rebuttal. Well, that was done … his comment, mine in reply.

Next day, a different reply from him, opening with “you people” are this and that, you never bring receipts. That of course is rich. He misquoted with no receipts, I replied with receipts. Plus it’s defamatory because we always strive to bring or link to receipts … the whole Unherdable blogging thing is based on precisely that. I agree there had to be the initial comment and rebuttal, but then it got personal … plus incorrect. So I deleted that third.

See, I have an oath too … to defend all those involved in keeping this blog running, shutting out known dangers and attacks, on the lookout for others. And to act swiftly in order to do that. Second scenario coming up later.

12. It’s just the United States so far

Every item has to be checked. Every single one.

From whatever supermarket. Not just Aldi

Unless you want to be eating "bio engineered ingredients" franken food? https://t.co/K0st5VIJ53

— Clare Wills Harrison (@AwakenedOf) November 23, 2025

At least openly over there. Here probably the same but dishonestly, leaving it off the labels, like cloned beef and Bovaer milk.