(0644)

ddddd

Blasphemy and free speech

TDS had this today in its emailed newsletter:

Hamit Coskun, 51, was told last month that he had the right to offend, after a High Court judge quashed a previous conviction of a religiously aggravated public order offence. Coskun, who was born in Turkey, was convicted in June after shouting “f*** Islam” while holding the burning book aloft outside the Turkish consulate in London in February.

When his conviction was overturned last month at Southwark crown court it was deemed a “victory for free speech” by campaigners, who had feared the original decision paved the way to a de facto blasphemy law.

However, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has appealed to the High Court, asking it to rule on whether the decision was reached correctly. If successful, the court could then overturn Coskun’s acquittal or order a fresh hearing. …

Stephen Evans, the Chief Executive of the National Secular Society, said: “This appeal marks a renewed assault on free expression by prosecutors. The CPS seems determined to establish a blasphemy law by the back door.

This whole thing shows the diabolical cunning of the brains behind Fabianism in equating and conflating all philosophies as equal and the same, when the reality is that some are redemptive and others are born out of hating humankind, wanting humans either destroyed or in abject misery. To make blanket laws defending evil and good equally, under some vague concept of “fairness and equality” is sophistry, it stems from malice aforethought.

That’s the first point. The second is different but follows on from there … if it can be established that one particular faith underpinning the west, within the context of that nation’s nature, culture and history, did lead to a fairly stable “shire” people lived in around the 50s/60s, in which even a child could walk in safety or sit on the railway embankment, waving to passing trains …

… and if it can be shown that its replacement by a deathcult leads only to what we have on the streets and in every walk of life, 2020 to 2025, then the third point is who or what is this deathcult? And that can be answered by pointing to the ruling class in the grip of, say, the Rothschilds and other nephilim of the kind, combined with the new deathcult invaders … plus we might throw China and the subcontinent in there as a third head of the monster.

And what of the redemptive religion? Well the best way to evaluate it is to observe the way it is treated by the anti-humans, masquerading as goodies. Look at the destruction of churches westwide, at the Christians in Armenia, Syria and in Nigeria and the Sudan, at Isabel Vaughan Spruce and street preachers being arrested all over the place, at the destruction of cultural artifacts … whilst the destructive cults have free rein. They are clearly hellbent on wiping out that redemptive faith, they’ve been doing it since Roman times.

This article quoted above is all about the freedom to criticise the deathcult … then let’s say “free speech” prevails after the appeals are exhausted … what then? Make no mistake … in allowing attacks on the deathcults, it also allows attacks on the redemptive faith and that’s something the deathcults can get behind in the interim, in order to wipe it out once and for all.

Now let’s look at the opposite result … the blasphemy law does come in … it gives the deathcults, inc. the State, free rein, plus it turns the redemptive faith back into the pointy-hatted, hierarchical, coercive, Torquemada cult, allied to the State and as we see in Canterbury, riddled with irredemptive wokery … either way, the deathcults win.

The diabolical cleverness of the evil muvvers. Just going to end here with a screenshot of a fragment I saw: