(0607) Morning all, soon to become light.

 

Beauty is in the human imperfections built into a great design

Was talking to a dear friend and she said: “Many of those after whom men lust, are so faux. I would imagine they would prefer themselves with an AI gal.  The best to the couple!” Quite agree.

There’s a clip which goes with it, I looked at ten seconds, then replied: “Just my own opinion, mind, but a woman reaches her physical peak mid to late 30s … starting to get that roundness, losing the angularity and in yer face earnestness of a child, which is wearing … if she basically just looks after herself, that lasts well into her 50s and beyond to my mind and after that, she holds up well if she kept it natural, unlike the French who are soooo artificial. Plus if she’s just a nice, friendly, happy person and not a neurotic, man-hating superwoman wreck … it shows through and can’t be hidden.

But the trillion dollar industry disagrees of course … and they influence women to try to be unnatural, maniacally chasing after some corporate idea of “beauty”, from balayage to botox to surgery. To wigs.”

I’m astounded at so many men too … the attitudes, the blind worship of the Sydney Sweeneys, whom I see as a little tart on the wrong path. And as for that ruined creature in the clip above! To my mind, Meghan Trainor had it partly right: “Men like a little more booty to hold at night.” Curvature, that is, not bloatedness. That’s true … you can keep your stick insect barbie doll.”

Didn’t get a response to that, possibly as she’d fallen asleep … one of my skills, that, putting ladies to sleep through my droning on. Anyway, I carried on: “I just can’t get females to see that artificial enhancement is so ugly … that woman in the short clip is awful. Yuk. Ewww.  But Grifty, with her imperfections … I’ve seen a pic … my friend had sent the Grifty YT … now she’s one to go for.  It’s those very ravages of age which make her appealing, not any artificial enhancement.

There’s something though in the female which is maniacally into change for the sake of change, plus unachievable perfection, can never be satisfied.  Why?  For men, the equivalent is in trying to improve something already working well … models of planes, trains, automobiles. Leave them alone … they were great designs, tweak them, yes, just that, change the face of them now and then … but the core systems are good enough as they are. That’s what we fell in love with in the first place.”

Higgs boson … why? Trying to play God? Tower of Babel? Just leave the fundamentals the way they are! Here endeth the rant.