(0747) Morning all. Dull out there. Not 100% here but should improve. (0849)

 

10. And whilst still on schools

9. Was this so or was it made up, exaggerated?

Let’s look at the (generally) faux media just to get the denial:

Right … well the extra is for turning up at the school … yes. Reuters is not wrong there. However, what’s with the original court case in the first place … what was that about?

https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/E-9-2022-003385_EN.html

8. Another real puzzler

There’s a three minute youtube of a dry river bed being covered by water in a short time … very nice … except:

Just why would you, as an uploader, drown out the sound of the water rising? If that is what the video’s about? It’s almost a mania, fanaticism whenever something is portrayed, not to allow nature to just be … it must be embellished, helped along, otherwise it’s too boring.

7. Peter Clack

Why would people even countenance such obvious claptrap?

6. That river in Egypt

Rather than dwelling on why normies are as they are and why these ones should follow O’Brien … the word Fabian comes into play here … to me, the more interesting question is why Fabians themselves do as they do, push the things they push when society has never headed upwards to prosperity and security as a result of these policies, excusing that by happily muttering that the conditions weren’t right at that time.

We could also ask about the effect of Christianity. Chesterton was asked why it had been tried and found wanting. He replied that it had never been tried as a system beyond cultural consensus, norms, e.g. church weddings, at least subscribing to fidelity, restating principles such as faith, hope and charity … and so on.

While a loose allegiance to those principles, at least in lip service, has underpinned ordinary westerners’ views, the other side is not like that … they’re fanatical, rabid in pushing agendas, usually clandestinely in the west, but bluntly and physically in death cult lands.

Why are they mentally like that? Flying so easily off the handle, vicious, when their entire philosophy they believe is love everyone and hug trees, “protect democracy”. For example, the mRNA vaxxes truth is appearing around the world, causing dropping of mandates … there is so much evidence, in this case (2020/1), yet the other side tenaciously clings to the karenhood, insisting everyone must be made to.

We saw the gainsaying at OoL recently … flatly saying that the accumulated evidence is not. Just that. Or on climate and Net Zero, for which there is copious evidence saying it’s bollox in this form … see the Peter Clack post item above. Why does the other side flatly deny? Yes, those with agendas and a financial killing to make … well, one can see why there. But normies?

And those hostile to, invading the west … they’re loving the division.