… “these” being youtubes of feral girls, appallingly parented and schooled, zero police and social services protection, except to drive equally feral fathers out of families, due to insane women but also due to their appallingly lax upbringing, where “freedom” becomes “do as thou wilt”, to anybody, anywhere, according to both males’ and females’ only code being to please oneself, at the mercy of the demonic:

Meanwhile, to its credit, one Natalie White has written, at TDS, on the Scottish girls’ footage:

It was disturbing content, and like everything else these days provided a great source for memes, and provoked huge amounts of division.

Obviously, she was the one demonised and arrested. I’ve seen her called a “feral thug” and a “retarded little shit, known in the area”, among other things.

To many though, she’s become a symbol of the utter gutter state of this country and an unlikely hero and emblem of our times.

There are, literaly, dozens of youtubes on modern women’s insanity:

… that one was by a girl, some defending it, others showing montages of them going out of their brains, along with all the entitlement, kickbutt supergirl, inter-racial, large “body count”, dressing however they want (libertarianism, remember) … virtue presumably in the dumpster. The output is about half female, half male.

The male videos are forensic, on every fault women have which make them impossible partners today … men’s faults are listed by the young females in their videos … ne’er the twain shall meet. One male posted Sydney Sweeney, asking isn’t she the most glorious princess, an icon, meaning white girl? I wrote above it … if she stopped dressing like a skank … maybe.

That did not go down at all well with androgen fuelled simp guys, nor the “women can do no wrong and don’t you dare suggest it” girls. Then come the androgen and estrogen both inside, creating the freak who shot up the church.

Normal? Usual? Usual … yes, today.

Who used to influence children? Largely conservative (when it came to children) parents (both in the home) plus teachers also fairly orthodox, if not overtly religious, plus the underlying code, plus very little access to filth for kids … we certainly knew of it, sometimes saw it … dad’s Playboys.

The feminazi’s and globopsycho’s huge victory was firstly destigmatising “body count” in women, plus men, plus getting young kids into it by sex instruction outside the home, or at least without parents’ knowledge of what it was about, plus the huge induction into employment for females, hence Gen X latchkey kids … downwards to today.

The two major raging arguments online are about women can have it all:

… and the other more specifically within that, which she covered in another interview with some seemingly large-online-reach man (can’t find the YT now but they quite agreed, the two of them, highly relaxed with each other but seemed true to their spouses, sat on either side of a table).

She wanted to know, from a man, how high up the list of turnoffs for a man is high body count, thinking nothing of seeing someone dishy – go home and give him all, this stranger, shorn of all sanctity of marriage considerations, just simply approved behaviour in today’s society.

Do men want a large pool of nooky with no responsibility? Obviously … skankdom … so is there any downside when almost all females are skanky in reality but “empowered” and noble in their heads?

And how to reverse that very much pushed mindset by Them and minions? Esp. those implanting it in children’s early lives, reinforced by TV, film, gaming, music. Every female in society giving it on call if he can con her, almost zero trad women who value their bodies. Every man’s fantasy, right?

Except when he tries to form a partnership. She has no idea how, nor him … fidelity was never part of their lives till now.