(0737) Right, morning all. This will be the last, ongoing post before the histus cutoff of 0900, resuming at 1500 later. I’ll certainly keep checking until I actually need to leave but no further content, nothing scheduled, until 1500. Sor-ry. (0900)
11. Applied lawfare
… “these” being youtubes of feral girls, appallingly parented and schooled, zero police and social services protection, except to drive equally feral fathers out of families, due to insane women but also due to their appallingly lax upbringing, where “freedom” becomes “do as thou wilt”, to anybody, anywhere, according to both males’ and females’ only code being to please oneself, at the mercy of the demonic:
Meanwhile, to its credit, one Natalie White has written, at TDS, on the Scottish girls’ footage:
It was disturbing content, and like everything else these days provided a great source for memes, and provoked huge amounts of division.
Obviously, she was the one demonised and arrested. I’ve seen her called a “feral thug” and a “retarded little shit, known in the area”, among other things.
To many though, she’s become a symbol of the utter gutter state of this country and an unlikely hero and emblem of our times.
There are, literaly, dozens of youtubes on modern women’s insanity:
… that one was by a girl, some defending it, others showing montages of them going out of their brains, along with all the entitlement, kickbutt supergirl, inter-racial, large “body count”, dressing however they want (libertarianism, remember) … virtue presumably in the dumpster. The output is about half female, half male.
The male videos are forensic, on every fault women have which make them impossible partners today … men’s faults are listed by the young females in their videos … ne’er the twain shall meet. One male posted Sydney Sweeney, asking isn’t she the most glorious princess, an icon, meaning white girl? I wrote above it … if she stopped dressing like a skank … maybe.
That did not go down at all well with androgen fuelled simp guys, nor the “women can do no wrong and don’t you dare suggest it” girls. Then come the androgen and estrogen both inside, creating the freak who shot up the church.
Normal? Usual? Usual … yes, today.
Who used to influence children? Largely conservative (when it came to children) parents (both in the home) plus teachers also fairly orthodox, if not overtly religious, plus the underlying code, plus very little access to filth for kids … we certainly knew of it, sometimes saw it … dad’s Playboys.
The feminazi’s and globopsycho’s huge victory was firstly destigmatising “body count” in women, plus men, plus getting young kids into it by sex instruction outside the home, or at least without parents’ knowledge of what it was about, plus the huge induction into employment for females, hence Gen X latchkey kids … downwards to today.
The two major raging arguments online are about women can have it all:
… and the other more specifically within that, which she covered in another interview with some seemingly large-online-reach man (can’t find the YT now but they quite agreed, the two of them, highly relaxed with each other but seemed true to their spouses, sat on either side of a table).
She wanted to know, from a man, how high up the list of turnoffs for a man is high body count, thinking nothing of seeing someone dishy – go home and give him all, this stranger, shorn of all sanctity of marriage considerations, just simply approved behaviour in today’s society.
Do men want a large pool of nooky with no responsibility? Obviously … skankdom … so is there any downside when almost all females are skanky in reality but “empowered” and noble in their heads?
And how to reverse that very much pushed mindset by Them and minions? Esp. those implanting it in children’s early lives, reinforced by TV, film, gaming, music. Every female in society giving it on call if he can con her, almost zero trad women who value their bodies. Every man’s fantasy, right?
Except when he tries to form a partnership. She has no idea how, nor him … fidelity was never part of their lives till now.
(0526) Morning all … still dark out there. (0600) Light appearing, overcast, no brilliant dawn as it was yesterday. (0601)
10. DAD at 0545 at 1144
a) France’s hard-right and hard-left parties on Thursday rejected a compromise with Prime Minister Francois Bayrou…
b) France: Mélenchon [Neo-communist] threatens Departmental Prefects with prison if far-left LFI takes power.
c) Polls spell disaster for both Bayrou and Macron.
d) Many people choose to move away from Britain, whether to avoid the dreary weather or to start fresh somewhere new; but to where are they going ? *
*JH: And don’t forget they take their mindsets and habits with them.
9. Plastic packaging
8. Rob the people blind
7. Ah, paid “counter-protesters” bussed in
… escorted into position by “impartial” plod … never changes, “violence flares”, token “far-righter” arrested, or if govt is trying to demonstrate to the world beaming, kindly impartiality … token Antifa arrested, demonstrating the new “cracking down on crime”.
6. Taking this up in a subsequent post
… from another angle:
5. Priorities
4. Getting around govt
3. Things operating smoothly
(0404) There’s to be a hiatus for me on the blog today from 0900 to 1500, after which posting resumes. I’ll look when going past the ipad during the hiatus time. It’s a combination of medical matters in town and other jobs. Also, phone, buzzers etc. are off at that time.
2. Have just been going through immediate news items
… which are ready to roll and there’s a sameness … but one thing happening all the time is “same event, different spin”.
The Scottish girls’ story is one such story … it’s not moved on all that much this morning at the time of writing, so it’s possible to go back over and see weird interpretations, then debunked by those “on our side”, that is … pro the girls.
As a news presenter, i.e. I use various sources around the world funnelled through the bottleneck of X, plus I’m accessing Gab … and those are accessing all different news sources, from MSM to local rags to people just coming in and posting … you’d appreciate that it’s a massive job filtering, fraught with my own biases.
Then there are the items themselves. One was an item opening with one of our “trusted sources” but still a non-journo lady, maybe only 80% aware and she quotes a source who follows all the expected formatting … middle-aged man profile pic, seemingly reliable, sane, and he’s saying it’s all psy ops … those two girls are part of a street gang and he shows a double photo. I had a close look and would have changed my tune if it had been verifiiable, with no anomalies.
They did not look the same as in the earlier online footage … we got a clear view in the footage. As he went on, the man, in good English, he was clearly Woke or globopsycho enabling. Now, our lady who opened just had three lines at the top in a question mark way. The Woke “trusted” was, however, assured, persuasive. He may well have two gang girls in the photos but one was clearly not the same.
Ah, thought I … if you look at the report from yesterday about this Mayah Sommers, her mum said she went to call police so was not there in the footage … that was Lola (with knives) and Ruby, the one attacked … the taller girl (attacked) with the phone.
But that seems weird … she has her phone out, is blocked by these people … Mayah, according to mum, has gone to phone police? But people carry phones. I’m surmising Mayah got away to phone in peace. By the way, remember my post saying girls should go in groups minimum three? Interesting, that.
What we do know is that axe girl is traumatised. From the body language man, also named Jesus (OoL readers will understand that reference), that traumatising is also noted. So, back to the Woke “respectable” saying they’re just little thugs on an estate … yes,and what? How did they get that way? What gives with that Milton Keynes type new estate culture?
One thing for sure is it was godless, dog eat dog … they euphemise that as “tough neighbourhood”. Not the squalour of the early 1900s though … this now is clinical, brutal nothingness, councils call it civic pride.
Switching now to JD Vance. In the midst of the church killings, people apparently were praying … that’s what a church is for. Now, were you one of Them, you’d obviously wish to show that God did nothing to save the victims and sure enough, some Dem pollie ranted about that.
JD Vance called it out … “prayer does not replace action”, which is quite different in meaning to “prayer is no replacement for” … you do see the subtle slide there. Clever slide. Mocking tone, a bit like Meghan mock bowing to the Queen …remember that?
How sharp is the average normie, not tuned into every news item coming in, as pundits are, have to be … how likely is the normie to pick up the difference? Especially being stressed by the govt making life hell, stresses of family, stresses of health? Other indulgences. And would they care? They only saw a Manchurian (in my estimation, typical playbook) troon (see Roobeedoo) killing people, part of the all out assault on the generic “religion”, the atheists’ standard term framing.
Roseanne Barr comes in, saying we’re in a “spiritual war” … good v evil. Ok so far.
In her eyes then, all three Abrahamic religions have a majority of good people, with just some nutters. Individuals dotted about. Conflating in other words, equating. One of those has secret kill counts, with names like Rothschild, one has the Pope and Woke women pastors “representing” all faithful, the third has rapes, stabbings, burnings, crazed eyes and beards, chanting death from the stream to the pond.
The same?
So that raises questions about Roseanne Barr, about her understanding, possibly her Gaia agenda. Meanwhile, two Sikap burn down another church. The atheists scream with the Sikap: burn em all down, opiate of the masses. Ok … how many synagogues and mosques do you see burning down? Hmmmm?
There’s a lunacy about in the west, a freakery, an illogicality of measures, an unsafeness, a lawlessness, a depravity, no? You call that Scottish girls thing not depraved, just life’s rich pageant? Yuri Bezmenov stated that once demoralisation is complete, no one is able to adequately reason any more, in order to free themselves from this tyranny. Christians would call it satan’s tyranny … nothing new in it … have a look at the history of King Stephen and notes from the time … similar blight. Never nobility in the new order … always descent into blight. Some might say planned to be so.
1. Steve at 1143