The walk, the awareness

Even this girl in the clip made an error, to my mind. She got most of it right imho but when she started the ego talk … I’m going to own this space, be me me me me … that’s feminism 201.

All right, what would I say instead?

a. Ditch the ego straight away, this ‘I’ve got this covered’ mentality … no you haven’t, not with enough of them or even one street fighter or even being surprised/ambushed. Adjust to your circumstances … choose routes less likely, time of day less likely.

b. Walk quietly and fairly swiftly, looking all about you with eyes, not head, in a confident but still cautious way, no head movement beyond 90 degrees but eye observant. If you stop, choose somewhere you have behind you covered, where there’s a possible escape route. Posture upright, feet not together afap.

c. Depends on your nature but slight grin occasionally works. There was one time, on a Liverpool train, lads get on, occupying my half carriage. Someone jokes, it’s funny, slight grin me, one of them says, “He knows, he knows.” Thank the Lord for that. They got off the train before I did. Just don’t rely on that though.

d. Space … when I go down for a delivery, there’s a good vantage spot, escape route behind, quickly rehearse it in my mind. Watch everyone with an expressionless stare who comes by or crosses the road, walks on by over there. Be in ready mode, watch the pedestrian like a hawk. If he comes past you, be pleasant, nod good morning.

e. None of that above is necessarily going to work if your posture and body are too soft but if a woman, neither too supergirl … if you don’t have a lifetime of fending for yourself … Russia helped me here … no amount of advice will help.

f. First reaction. Mine is to attack, not defend … just the result of decades doing it … knee in the groin, plus steaight for the eyes … but that’s not so useful in Starmer plod land where even saying boo sees you at the plod station … so I’d neither recommend or not.

g. Know yourself, your limitations … if you’re at a disadvantage most times, then don’t go there in the first place, esp. little guys and/or women.

h. Be aware that these are not now normal times. Apart from obvious enemy types out there, anyone can, even a girl, sneakily.

i. Show no fear at any time, which comes from years of planning and instinct. Do your praying as a rule, not as a last cry for mercy.

j. Apart from that, as the girl says in the clip.

k. You’re either straight or a bit nutter anyway but a slight nutterness helps … crazy eyes. Not nuttiness … that’s entirely different. I mean just a bit unknowable, a bit unpredictable. Sudden position changes then calm again. Watchful like a hawk. Sharp.

That’s about all I can think of.

Alien-nation

No, not the key political issue just now in many minds but rather that separation which the years bring on as they pile up against us.

There’s a chap who runs this on X and it’s a curiosity:

For me, maybe Roy Orbison … for one of the commenters, 20 was his choice, the rest dross. Goodness, imho none of them were much shakes … giving away the year straightaway … 1992. Hmmmm, where was I? Still in Blighty I think, London town or north. How come I don’t even know most of these pop songs?

Not just DAD but also Steve were more classically inclined by then … I’m vaguely recalling the advent of rap, Betty Boo the microphone dropper, East 17, boy bands … didn’t do much for me. The last good songs I could remember were maybe from The Bangles, with Susie.

(0718) Morning all. Dull out there. (0818)

 

8. Just an Op Ed

Paraphrasing what MMutR said yesterday … everyone disagrees on something, which makes toeing the party line on all things near impossible … “we” here have the same issue, e.g. on DJT, on Pammy, on Steinep.

The thing is … how major is the difference of opinion? Fundamental, as in the direction the country should be going? Also as in Wokery versus anti-Wokery? Or just fine differences we can encompass? The consequences of “one party line” Starmer, Tories, Reform is that rebellion is always on the cards.

The consequences of all these little factional parties is that none have the power to take on the bad people, e.g. Mertz in Germany, who are ideologically One Think and not split, through money or fear.

And the ordinary people … upper middle aspirants, like many Reform libdem types, inc. Farage, not interested in tackling the core issue v the common working people who are more likely to embrace Rupert and think TR did not have it wrong. Women in particular who have nice homes, a certain status, are far less likely, e.g. Sarah Pochin, Dame Andrea, to see themselves as anything like the plebs below.

What chance Reform ever holding together, esp. with the Milsum shadow hovering in the bkgd?

But more than that … we’re constantly forced, on this point or that, to alter our position on this point or that … can anyone then trust us as friendly, onside?

And it’s not accidental, any of it … confound and confuse is the core strategy of whoever Mr. Big is … whether the commies or shaitan hisself. They were simpler days when we were growing up.

7. More of the same I’m afraid

6. DAD at 1099

a) Economic collapse [in the UK] is now inevitable, says Daniel Hannan in the Telegraph, and he identifies June 27th 2025 as the Ground Zero Day when the future became set in stone….

b) Double Standards? Not UK this time: but EU. Brussels deems Spain’s corruption scandal a “National Matter”.

c) Frauke Brosius-Gersdorf, a lawyer described as far-left, is poised to become a new judge at the Federal Constitutional Court, Germany’s top court, and it is very bad news for Germany’s conservatives.

d) Like they’ve just reinvented fire. “Solid-state battery! 1,800 miles of range! Five-minute charge!” No chance !

e) Elon Musk ridicules Trump Admin’s Epstein claims?

(0345) Oops, another early awakening in the middle of the night but not an issue. (0421)

 

5. Moosh corner

4. Steve at 1099

• Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass Confronts Federal Agents, Tries to Stop Lawful Immigration Raid
• Dem Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz Says Mass Deportations Part of Trump and Stephen Miller’s Plan to ‘Bleach’ America
• White House Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt Grilled on Epstein Nothing Burger and Previous Statements by Pam Bondi, Claims DOJ Performed “Exhaustive Review” – “That’s Transparency”
• DOJ Caught Cutting 60 Seconds from Newly Released Epstein 10 Hour Jail Cell Tape! What’s Going On?
• Charlie Kirk: Massive Push Happening Behind the Scenes to Get President Trump to Provide Amnesty to 25 Million Illegal Aliens
• Strikes Overview: Russia Intensifies Attacks on Ukrainian Recruitment Centers
• Gen X’ers and Millenials getting cancer of the appendix at four times the rate since COVID spike prion injections rollout – Coincidence?
• Germany’s AfD to soften stance on migrants – Bild
• Much more.

3. Meanwhile … the opposition’s new party

And therein lies the answer to the question in Tue 1 or so it seems. Who was it who suggested that the thing is a bi-play between DJT and Elon, that there is no real rift, that it’s an exercise in which Elon eventually capitulates … making the Donald seem triumphant … all theatre …

… or else it actually is real, coordinated by the very dark forces running the agendas west-wide?

2. What is the point of this betrayal of blind trust?

What did they hope to achieve, just as approval overall was swamping the demonrats and supporters?

1. Over at OoL

https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2025/07/the-chasm-between-self-appointed-rulers.html