(0613) Morning all, sun is glowing somewhere out there. (0713)

 

4. Before getting to Steve [Saturday 5]

… I have to take issue with one particular item … it was in this Liberty Beacon … tried to find who they were … one Roger Landry perhaps, or a Sheldon … the navigation is atrocious, as one would expect. There’s a formalised, on site Contact page, offering this sort of thing:

“There is no Kris on TLB staff that can read this and contact you. There is also no email address we can pass on …”

The reticence to list who they are is cagey, poor … they look very much a fake site masquerading, opaquely. I’m deciding whether to block them from HQ on the grounds of them not being a serious site. I need to explore more.

Why did this stand out unlike any other of Steve’s? Because it was a bleedin’ eulogy, not a report, divorced from any known facts … it was gushing, from heading to the last word, about Bondi’s first 100 days:

“But President Trump’s Law and Order Agenda, spearheaded by Attorney General Pam Bondi, stands out as his greatest accomplishment so far.

Today marks AG Bondi’s 100th day in office. She has done more in this period to Make America Safe Again than any attorney general in modern history.“

Wot, like Bindergate? Calling MAGA “oh them”? All talk and prettiness on Fox? Only low-hanging fruit threatened, no one substantial? At a minimum, Pammy has been highly questionable and in fact, relentlessly questioned.

The Liberty Beacon might be fine for FB or Tiktok or Instagram but not here, with this guff. I’ll go back today and check out what else they’ve been posting. Grrrrrrr.

……

(0720) Update

All right, I’ve run a quick check and this lot are prolific, in many fields, just as Unherdables is … they report anything they can lay their hands on but my original criticism stands … they are opaque.

So are we in a sense, in that our boys and gals use monikers … and each one’s own hobbyhorses are identifiable … that is, a reader can identify a range each person operates within … plus from time to time, so much else is a known-known … even to Redacted or Juan … we’re all easily “profile-able”. Not so anyone at Liberty Beacon. And that’s not liked here, as our own reputations are on the line.

On the other hand, most reports I skimmed back through were fine … they were reportage with an angle … it was just this Pammy eulogy which stank. Hmmmm.

Just one more thing … to my mind, open bias is fine, as long as we know who they are … Laura Loomer, for example, is a known-known … so is Levan or Southfront … so was Rush … so are MAGA regulars, TR supporters … Gates of Vienna is a known-known. Nuff for now.

3. DAD at 1048

a) Pfizergate: Von der Leyen should be “pushed out by the Parliament,” conservative MEPs commented…..

b) Meanwhile, in France… (at Gates of Vienna)…..

c) Tour of Italy cycle race. Pro-Palestan protesters distruption {Do these idiots not realise that stunts like this only cause negative support?} *

d) All that is dire in Britain now was seen in the tawdry way it celebrated VE Day.

……

*I saw that attack by the Hamas flagwavers … they tried to hold a rope or ribbon across in front of the peleton to crash the riders. All sorts of questions, yes?

How on earth did race organisers, plod, whatever, even members of the crowd … well you know. Now, to address DAD … because they are chosen for their consciencelessness, criminality and are well paid for the job. You might remember, in Casino Royale, Judy Dench telling Bond … he wasn’t even a true believer, he was a gun for hire … or simlar. Professional agitators.

2. Might be in some bother

… maybe not. Became irascible and curmudgeonly yesterday, snapped at a blinkered Reformist. Late evening, waking when I wanted not, I snapped at Emily Maitlis. Those outside the UK would know her not and you’d be lucky.

Dozens more in that vein too. It’s the sheer arrogance with the wrongness, the attempt to wind up. She (BBC) stopped MTG (Congress) for an interview, MTG used the F word (second word “off”) … Maitliss smirked … that was “victory” in her eyes.

There used to be a BBC anchor called Jeremy Paxman … he had a talent at winding up too but he was clever at it … Maitliss has no such cleverness and drags the name “woman” into the gutter. There’s one at C4, or was, think the name’s Newman, was taken down by that Canadian Prof I’ve forgotten.

Anyway, this Maitliss was at some evening do (in Palmer’s Green?), dressed in completely open front and this illustrates not just that women need to be careful, if being the vulgar slapper … but they at least need to have the body for it. Suddenly, last night, the expression “grotesque, flashed ud***s” … you know, what cows give milk with … and before I could stop … well, you know the score.

She was “interviewing” Rupert Lowe and he was “taking her to the cleaners” … it was a planned Beeb hitjob of course … getting dangerous is Rupert … guess who was getting cattiest?

Yep … Reformists, protecting Nige:

And so on. The fun vee haf, yes?