(1720) Evening all.
19. Andy and dandelion syrup
18. That topic again ⦠sorrā¦ee

17. What can one say?

16. Need to address book writing
AKH has a piece on books ⦠hmmmm, been thinking for a long time ⦠have actually mentioned a couple of times ⦠thereās something which stops people reading books by authors in another field, e.g. blogs. It doesnāt necessarily follow that if he can write good non-fiction, that he can write fiction without it being twee.
There are his perceptions and interests, his manner too ⦠good for the blog ⦠but in a book, all those secret things heās wanted to write come out. A synopsis certainly helps up front, rather than expecting a reader just to plunge in. Thereās his writing style, if he plays fair, all sorts weād like to know first.
I went off Wimsey once I knew Dorothy L. Sayersā bkgd ⦠Wimsey was emasculated for a reason ⦠he was a feministās idea of a man. My women in my tales had to pass a test and a very unforgiving test I was sure was going to be Toodles, who very kindly read the various pieces. Iām currently re-proofing Island ⦠zero expectation of anyone to read, as you donāt know how good I am or not.
To my mind, now up to chapter twelve, itās a rollicking yarn, Iād done my homework back then it seems, not sure I could write like that now, Iām thinking itās my best yarn of em all, not that thatās here nor there ⦠but I donāt like the latter stages ⦠it gets bleak as society goes down ⦠it parallels real life at that point, dystopically. It needs a nice denouement at the end ⦠they find a way to survive.
Anyway, to reiterate, as itās not changed, that tale ⦠no point reading it yet ⦠but I do come back to that point again that we donāt wish to waste our time on unknown amateurs ⦠we need the author to be a known-known, to know his/her style, tricks, manner ⦠think Iād always read a Josephine Tey ⦠Scottish authoresses seem less ⦠something ⦠canāt pin it down but itās nice.
Anyway, nuff of all that, Andy just dropped a comment, I need dinner, want to get back to the proofing.
15. Steve and war room at 1049
- Jack Posobiec: āWhat We Care About Is Liberating The Central Animating Force Of Every Country.ā
- Josh Hammer: āTrump Is Facing A Judicial Insurrection Of The Likes Of No President In American History.ā *
- Mike Davis: The Supreme Court Issued An Illegal Injunction Against The President Of The United States
- āHopefully The Dead People Will Not Riseā George Simion On Romanian Deep State Working Against Prospective Landslide Victory For Populists
- āImagine If He Was Met With Meaningful Congressional Oversight Over Criminal Chargesā Natalie Winters On James Comey Assassination Threat
- āTheyāre There So The Chinese Can Remotely Kill These Solar Farmsā Sam Faddis On CCP Communication Tech Found In US Solar Inverters
ā¦ā¦
JH: Only thing Iād add is that Trumpās gatekeeper Wiles worries me ⦠heās bad at choosing gatekeepers, trusts a certain manner they adopt, a sort of tough efficiency. Plus heās naturally cavalier. Think he trusts Hegseth. Elon, natch, has his own agenda ⦠trouble at Tesla. RFK Jnr? Own agenda too ⦠nothing bad, just how it is. I donāt trust Wiles.