(0758) Morning all, red sky in the morning … sailor’s warning. (0927)
9. Mark the Skint Sailor at OoL on THAT issue
The answer to the trans issue can be summed up in three words: Lose the Penis. Then most of the issues especially regarding the idiocy that is self-identification fall away.
Society tends to have a limit where it’s generally accepted there is consensus on an issue.. Going against the consensus or being radical causes problems. It is definitely not stunning or brave. If you could only be considered as female if you had surgery (as used to be the case) then the issue of r@pe in female prisons, or penises in female changing rooms disappears.
The radical step of self-identification without doing anything else just reduces the concept of a woman down to looks, when it is far, far more complex. I note that transitioning the other way doesn’t create as many problems, is that just a male narcissist thing?
A few things came out of a mass of recommended YTs of late and the first is that so many females utterly fail to ustd the male and vice-versa. Females are on about putting out signals and males, being the emotional retards we are, fail to take hints.
I think, whilst that may hold some water … there’s more … if a male approaches, in this society now, it can only be for nooky in the minds of most … plus if he reads it wrong, the whole weight of state and law is down on him … these days, she has to be far more direct about what she wants … plus most women are worthless today by replacing love and courtship with THOTting or serial relationships (the Swift brand of satanism). The concept of saying NO until married and, “I would never take you to the cleaners, ever, unless you get violent,” is not in the modern female’s vocabulary.
Thus males avoid entanglement when nooky is on tap at any bar or club.
8. It takes a woman to really take down another woman
7. More snippets
a. Darl Pattison: Uh oh hope Kamala doesnt put a spell or hex on Brett. Real questions and usual non answers always blaming Trump while she’s been in office 4 years now.
b. Vigilant Fox: Kamala Harris Falls Apart in Train-Wreck Fox News Interview … (Harris) thought she was ready for Bret Baier—she was wrong. Two moments in particular were especially humiliating.
c. Rupert Lowe (Reform): (Fuel duty hike?) This is absolute madness – Reeves is going to suffocate our economy. The ONLY way to create real and sustainable growth is to slash tax and return power to the individual. Socialist central planning will always fail.
d. Charlie Kirk: Baier to Harris: “Your campaign slogan is a new way forward and it’s time to turn the page. You’ve been Vice President for 3.5 years. What are you turning the page from?” Excellent.
e. Lee Harris: It’s been revealed that Labour MP Peter Kyle received, wait for it… free Taylor Swift tickets. The reason we didn’t know about this bribe—sorry, ‘freebie’—until now is because he, just like Starmer, broke the rules by failing to declare it.
6. Lil ole me comments on three things from the previous post
Thurs 5a: Monster Jackboot: What gall by the cow … she deserves the hangman’s noose.
4a: Polish Owl: Breakdown of Laura Norder, innit? Remember Myleene Klaas? “
Myleene Klass warned after brandishing knife to deter intruders | Crime
10 Jan 2010 — Police tell TV presenter she was acting illegally in waving kitchen knife at youths who were peering in window late at night.
Utter bollox of the Guardian, typical fake MSM … disinformation as a matter of fact. The three or two climbed over the back fence, well aware a single woman with child was in there, a celeb. She brandished a knife … they certainly arrested her and nothing was done to find the scrots. And it’s the old question … what would you do? And how safe is it for any women now, let alone leftist? And who’s to blame for the way it is now?
Evets 3 quoted at HQ: A District Court Opinion Directly Challenges a Fulton County Judge’s Order That Election Officials Must Certify Voter Counts – Even If They Suspect Fraud:
Where do we even start? However, another court has called that Demonrat “judge” out. This thing is in jurisdiction and timing … it was timed to take effect immediately pre-election, in swing states … worry about the legalities later.
Now … who is directing the strategy, US wide? What’s their names? How can they be taken out? What’s riding on all this?