… in case you’ve been doing things to/on your carpet:
19. Last one … promise! 😁
18. There it is
17. US not a bad haven for real refugees
16. I too am totally fed up wi’it
I’m unsubscribing from M&S next time it appears, also Cheshire Oaks, although they are now leading with a Caucasian pretty-pretty, so someone told them to drop the constant Chinese. M&S though ONLY have black models for men’s wear, a mix for women’s. They can all get knotted.
… low moral compass, in thrall to outside interests … plus sheer malevolence and hatred for the people … quite a combination. Oh … plus deep collusion. Oh … and high treason.
12. Very nasty in Britain
And you can sure farmers are in the crosshairs on this too.
11. Lack of vigilance, complacency
If GOP voters don’t go out and vote, then Trump will soon lose his technical advantage in seats in all three houses and chambers.
10. MRNA death jabs
9. Not the slightest idea
… how much credence to give this (sound was just a lot of jabbering):
8. Gathering sshots and IYE report on this Signal thing
Trump has “forgiven” Waltz from Truth Social, I’m wondering though if it was a SNAFU or psyop of Hegseth and Trump, leaking false war plans? On the face of it, seems a SNAFU … need to look at Monkeywerx.
7. Proud dad presents
Credit to my eldest daughter; she has already figured this out. Many women take their whole lives to grasp this concept. https://t.co/Wxjz7gQf3V
— Community Leader Alex Bath (@AlexanderBath) March 26, 2025
JH: That was a torrid Wednesday opener at HQ, as well as out there in the world. That’s why we’re primarily better as a newsgathering site, as long as different angles are coming in. Personally, I’ve loaded what I have, now I’m going to Steve’s links, then see what IYE might say or other regulars or irregulars, also having a quick look at the Beeb front page to see what they were trying to spin. When I start my blogrounds, there’ll be more.
5. Steve at 1005
Trump Revokes Secret Service Protection for […] Former DHS Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas
DOJ […] Tells Judge Boasberg it will Provide Him No More Info on Deportation Flights
Switzerland Hands Out its First ‘Burqa Ban’ Fine
Immediate Declassification of FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane Files
Ratcliffe Blows Up Media’s Narrative About Encrypted App Signal*
White House Blasts “Sensationalist” Reporting Over Group Chat Leak**
Liberal 9th Circuit Court Overturns Biden Judge Ruling
New Cauldron In Kursk Region
Trump’s Team Hit by Globalists – Advisor Mike Waltz
German Parliament begins sitting today in historic first***
Putin Senior Advisor Patrushev Insights on Arctic & Baltic Fronts
Trump nominates vaccine zealot Susan Monarez to lead the CDC
Trump’s banning of CBDCs is a moot point
Much more.
……
JH: Here we go again … a test of how to abridge text. With Steve here, IYE and DAD, plus anyone else in comments … the rules must change regarding abridging quotes. For a start, the originals are perma-available by just going there, mine here are just signposting summaries. Then there is the reader who requires succinct summaries, the general idea only … the originals are there to check them against.
The purpose of Wed 1 today was for external quotes moreso than our own droppers. There’ll no doubt be exceptions but in general, maybe it’s now been covered, this abridging biz.
* The Ratcliffe Signal biz in the US was blowing up last evening … not sure I’ll post on it, it seems to be covered … I might have saved a sscrot last night, shall look.
**Same.
***German parlmt’s never sat before? Shall check this out.
4. An abridged item at TLS today
“Toby Young was given his peerage for the wrong reason. He deserved elevation to the Lords for his creation of Lockdown Sceptics (as the Daily Sceptic was first known) alone. It was a beacon of sanity in a time when the entire world went mad…..
[…]
The single most important reason for lockdown was fear. Both the vast majority of the public and politicians were deathly afraid.….
The second fundamental reason for lockdown was the fact that ‘combatting the virus’ was, for a lot of people, tremendous fun. It gave people a purpose in life that they had never enjoyed before.….
The third reason for lockdown that Toby misses is that it was all for free […] the government in its munificence tore up the economic rule book to run the largest bar tab in the history of the universe.”
…….
JH: Almost immediately after writing all that in Wed 1, which even confused me, it was put to the test with DAD’s drop and now TDS. Didn’t want a page full of […]s all the way down, blighting the page and belying the entire reason for abridging, which was to make more succinct.
Hence mentioning now that other device … the final word, followed by five dots…..
3. DAD at 1005
a) Could it be connected with the stealing of sheep recently? It was a resident of the La Lœuf neighborhood, who walked every morning along the banks of the Cher River, who made the discovery on Monday, March 17. Nine 30-litre bags of garbage…..
b) A fiery Western leader on immigration is desperate to deport a series of violent criminals southward to a country the West once had great influence over—but that country is resisting. France (did you think I was talking about somewhere else?) is home to a very large Algerian population…..
c) Turkey’s democratic façade collapsed on March 19, when Istanbul mayor Ekrem Imamoglu – the West’s secular poster boy – was snatched from his bed in the middle of the night and thrown in jail…..
d) A Polish court has upheld a decision by the Mayor of Toruń to stop an anti-abortion protest over the display of a picture of a foetus.
Just saw this below, in which I’ve posted the profile as a sshot and the rest in text*:
Well, hello everyone! Yes, it is really me. I am back! As a great number of you had noticed, I have been missing online for almost two months now. I disappeared almost as soon as the trial for the Sport [ma sacre toux**]ended. Public opinion and concern has been split as to why I went missing; between those who thought I had a breakdown after covering [ma sacre toux], and those who thought I had caved to government pressure to stop reporting upon the cover-up. Neither of these, thanks to the strength of public feeling and the support of my colleagues, is true. What really happened? Three days after the trial ended, my X/Twitter account was hacked. My profile remained intact; live but inactive. Except for one thing…My viral timeline […] had been unpinned and DELETED.
This timeline had been collated on the day of [the] sentencing, and detailed exactly what had taken place on that dreadful summer’s day in Sport. It exposed how the […] Government had failed time and time again to prevent this monster from moving about with freedom, and what they and other authorities had done to cover-up their incompetence, and the devastating consequences of their political agenda. This timeline had been see by 50 million people within 3 days – and was recognised as one of the most authoritative records of the [ma sacre toux]. But, just as my account was gaining momentum, and I had the platform to explore the depth of the corruption in this case – including the anti-etihw sentiment of [him] being glossed over by the Establishment and mainstream media – this detailed timeline of evidence was deleted, and I was locked out the account until this morning. (More on this to follow.) I do not know who did this to me, or what caused X to withhold my account from me for almost two months***. But there is one thing of which I am certain: Whoever did this did not want the hideous truth about the [ma sacre toux] in the public domain…
……
*I, JH, need to establish new formatting rules for sensitive copy. After viewing IYE’s YT (coming up), the critical thing comes down to accuracy, plus posting what we have cause to believe is true. Ultimately, that’s my call.
(i) If I post a screenshot, it’s never altered but is almost always an abridged (snippet). Text though always runs the risk of alteration, if only to insert paragraph breaks.
(ii) If, for example, I leave out great swathes of text, then I need to show you I did … but succinctly. The way to do this is to go to new para and type […], which my keyboard conveniently allows me to do easily:
(iii) If I need to delete whole words, then I still use […] but in the body of the text, without para break … this distinction between (i) and (ii) is important. It will only be some words, not whole paras or swathes done this way and there is always a reason, which I’ll tell you if you ask, otherwise it’s too cumbersome.
(iv) If I need to retain a word such as Sport, as it is essential for meaning, it will be letter substituted or rearranged or even the euphemism I wrote of some time back. This is particularly needed in home news, not so much across the pond or ditch.
(v) If I use the asterisk method below six dots in a line, then I do not also need the JH, as you’ll know it’s me. When not using asterisks, I need to put in JH. With Stevedrops at NOWP, I need to stop inserting lettering, as it does not correspond to the HQ “list” method which seems to be working as signposting.
(vi) If I quote you, then I’d need to put in the JH to differentiate. If still unclear, I’d need to italicise.
(vii) If I use () … no special significance. If I use [], it either indicates subject heading or insertion. That insertion can also be your own, as Steve does with [the] Ukraine. You need give no reason unless directly asked … but the [] is quite significant … it indicates deliberate insertion, for our reasons.
**With the [ma sacre toux], you need to know sufficient French or history. The tale was that Napoleon III had a bad toux or cough, muttered “my damned cough” … but the soldiers took it as “tous” or “everybody” … well, so the tale goes. I’m thinking you catch my drift in her text above then.
Why such convoluted setting out? See the para following * above.
*** “I do not know who did this to me, or what caused X to withhold my account from me for almost two months.”
Interesting question … could be bots/algorithm/key words, could be minions of the WEF CEO of X, could be half a dozen reasons, inc. a homegrown agency sitting over all we write. Could be just a hackster.
27. And now for some more serious evening listening
Was just watching some reactions to the 1965 Wooly Bully and one was nice with a gal named Dani bopping away 6 days ago:
Then came some French partying to the song in 1966 … was about to give it away and head off to the land of nod when I saw a long version … had never heard it before … ignore the pic, it’s basically audio:
Think because the shorter, softer, released version was more conducive to girls shimmying, it would maybe sell more to mid 60s yoof, don’t know. For me, the more aggressive second version was mine. We used to play the first version in our band.
Now, in the lyrics, it says, “Let’s not be L7 …” tell me if you know what that meant in the day.
26. Christian perspective on probable civil war
25. Yesterday I think it was
24. Steve
He has an X link about an Irish pastor preaching outside … now in court.
Plus War Room:
Superficial Growth: Ed Dowd On How Taxpayer Dollars We Used To Fund Illegal Immigration
Julie Kelly: Appellate Court Weighs Future Of TRO Aiming To Shut Down Trump Deportations
Mike Davis On Activist Judges: “We Cannot Take Impeachment Probe Off The Table”
Dave Bossie On Implementing Pelosi Timeline For Impeachment Of Federal Judges
23. Warble gloaming
22. Wonder which satirical site posted this? 🤔
21. Are they insane?
20. Here we go again
Farage and Reform have doxxed names of Rupert Lowe’s staff. This is one reaction:
Ex Reformers are not known for taking a backwards step:
(1201) Afternoon all … still quite a backlog to clear or alternatively … quite a few interesting items coming up. Some baroque will follow that, while searching around for a good film. (1410)
19. On that primary head cancelling Easter
18. While Donny appoints Big Pharma to the top job
17. What’s in a name?
16. IYE with Miles
“The first is a story out of Ukraine, where the Defense Ministry is recruiting new soldiers with promises of thousands ofMcDonald’s cheeseburgers. I am absolutely not making that up. This war has now gone so transparently fake they figure why not just insert a McDonald’s ad right into the middle of it. I guess next they will appoint Mayor McCheese as the new President to replace Zelensky.”
JH: Scrolled down but could not find the word “second” for the other story.
15. Coming back to the Susan Wiles thing again
What on earth is going on with Donny? Ok, he fell for the Fauci Birx Pence Brock shtick (PEPFAR) and you can see how they spun it to him because he went all Warp Speed, without once exploring it himself. And the same’s happening here with Gatekeeper Wiles … this woman is looking to be bad news, not unlike Pammy.
A large percentage voting Trump were not just MAGA but also MAHA … and here he is doing dirt on RFK Jnr in the worst way possible. What the heck? I’m not personally a food fanatic but I sure am political and Donny has done great damage by this appointment, in the same way Farage has in Britain.
I’m hoping it’s inadvertent, that he has so much to deal with just now. He was obviously never interested in the health issue and so he was easily duped … can he wake up to Wiles?
14. On one of Steve’s in item 2 today
“California GOP Delegate Says Populists Still Outnumbered in Party Leadership Despite Growing Support — “60% of Our Delegates Are Basically RINOs””
That question applies to us too … what are the real numbers for the UK? Is it 52% good people or is it 30% or so, which was UKIP’s victory in the Euros, brfore Nigel went mental or gave his longterm game away? What about the near 80% who did not vote for Starmer in the GE?
How do the numbers really fall?
Enemy globopsycho, e.g. Mark Elias, Gates, Soros, old families behind them … what … 2% of western populations?
Then pollies, the compromised, from maniacs like Starmer and Obama to fanatics like Rice over there … any Labour pollie, much of the Tory voter class, all Lib Dem, Greens, many Reform, esp. the gang of five (with Oakeshott) … 5% of the population?
Then deluded MSM, judiciary, medicos, acting class, education, church, karens … useful idiots, plus all those paid to go to Hamas rallies, key cars etc. … what … 45%? They contain those though who, on a given issue, e.g. Southport, forget to support the demonic.
Now to good people … some within the Tory voters, maybe 10% of the pop? A few good Labour voters actually caring for their land? Who knows?
Then the dissenters but many comprise low info thinkers … e.g. those still thinking Farage is not uniparty, so subtracting those from the good (that can change once they finally wake up though, e.g. grassroots Reform) … maybe the hi info dissenters, e.g. on X, are what … 10% of the voting pop?
Then the “just not interested in politics peeps”, e.g. nature people, old England etc. … good people, fine people, but politically unaware and don’t wish to know … who knows what %? But if they vote Uniparty, they are supporting wrongdoing. Includes the politically bewildered.
Then the deathcult invaders … 30% of the country yet? 20%? Jewish troublemakers, Chinese etc.? 3%?
So, reducing this to those supporting policies for their country to thrive? 15% would you say, all up? The other 85% blindly supporting evil, wrong, greed to varying degrees, mostly not knowing they are? I simply don’t know the real numbers on that.
… take your eyes off the enemy for a day and they’ll steal seats, voting numbers … the non-demons do need to be vigilant.
11. As in previous item 10
… one side’s outcomes result in this sort of thing … the other’s results in a workable society.
10. This one earlier from Steve
“Senior UK Military Disregard Starmer’s Plan for ‘Boots on the Ground’”
This is not a lot different to the military ignoring Donald 1.0 … difference is of course that we’re pleased on our side of politics … the demonic were pleased in the earlier case across the pond.
What I’m getting at is that we do employ similar tactics, so it really does come down to “who has right on their side”? Were you a silly left liberal, rabid marxist or globo psycho … your reply to that would be uniform, as we all like to feel we have right on our side.
But in the light of vadtly different outcomes … that is, one side’s outcome results in the destruction of family, the economy, violence upon women and children … and the other side’s results in a strong western economy, geopolitical entity which people from other countries are desirous of joining … offering some peace of mind … the question does seem to answer itself.
9. It’s going to take a while, if at all
8. Family matters
I’m thinking Bren would be exactly the type you’d call a keeper … a woman who can actually admit a fault or when she might be in error (however rare that is).
