Quick word to Steve … this below was in the delivery chute, saw your Crecy YT, next on the list, ok?
Quick word to Steve … this below was in the delivery chute, saw your Crecy YT, next on the list, ok?
(1042) Back on track, chaps and chapesses, time to find out what’s in the queue. Zero actually, TDS just came through. Need to explore again. (1200)
8. Housekeeping
Broadening that heading to mean more than cyber issues … in fact encompassing anything not strictly politics of the day … I’ve just looked around and not even the Americans have much of note … that New York monster standing for mayor, shutdown still on, the Russian sounding lady being attacked by the demonrats and deep state trolls, Starmer and Khan … I’ve a few items, not much, will post later.
No film, no jazz, yet, quite a few features though … we roll with what we have, rather than trying to make something out of a thin day so far. Might play some chantoosies in the afternoon for jazz.
Commentary on one or two of Steve’s overnight drops … these will open the afternoon’s politics just past 1300.
7. Evil muvvers

6. Ah, here’s the meat we need

5. Quite a few of interest in here

(0653 GMT) Main post of the day (0655 GMT)
Dearest readers, rough night for sleep, am grabbing some now if possible till around 1000 GMT, all right? Also switching buzzer and phone off for now Don’t forget to change your clocks too.
https://jameshigham.substack.com/p/the-main-reason-we-cannot-combine
https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-main-reason-we-cannot-combine.html
Will there be all in violence, conflagration and slaughter in the streets, in our homes? Well, it’s started in tester form, hasn’t it? Or will the population meekly succumb to the digital ID and all the other tools of enslavement?
Or will we end up as the Eloi in the time machine, suspended from cliff face communities or from Morlock meathooks?
Over at OoL is a two screenshot idea of how to get around the agenda of the savages … it’s by a chap calling himself Paleo on Gab. It’s followed by one of our readers, Lord T who had just read that Paleo piece.
(0515) Question is … is it GMT or GMT +1? Ah, it’s GMT, as my wall clock plus mobile both say 0615, which is actually a pretty good sleep for me, from about 1130 GMT+1, no aches and pains, no bad dreams. Going to run the main post of the day at Jstack around 0630 GMT, not here. (0556 GMT)
3. Steve at 1183
2. This, like DAD’s 1c, is a precursor to my upcoming post

1. DAD at 1183
Did you change your clocks?
a) How Macron became the anti-de Gaulle. The French president desired to be Jupiter; instead, he became Icarus.
b) Faith in the French political system has completely collapsed according to an annual survey: a stunning 96 per cent of the public are either “dissatisfied or angry” about the current state of France.
c) Union of the French Right: what are they waiting for? It is torture to see the country falling apart and the right wing unable to come up with a common winning strategy. (JH: My post coming up on this.)
d) The [US] teachers unions, who are rioting, have badly failed the kiddos they recruit to riot…
(1817) Evening all. (Around 1900) Crashed. (2150) Up again, watching football.
19. This is more a Saturday night than Sunday morning item
Steve posed an enigma with this comment:
17b. is…Timothy Mellon. Now, toggle full screen and turn the sound up > this girl can sure play the saxophone..
Bryan Ferry Nuits de Fourviere Live in Lyon – Like a Hurricane HD | https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hTOcbONX5rs
First off … 17b … item was about Timothy Mellon. Somehow, Steve connects that to Bryan Ferry … or was it to Neil Young and Like a Hurricane?
a crowded, hazy bar ♫” There’s something hauntingly beautiful about this guitar laced personification of Neil Young’s intense desire for a paramour he longed for but could never attain.
Who also wrote a song about Graham Nash and Joni Mitchell. Anyway, the song is up at UHC-HQ. Was it connected to Jorja Chalmers?
18. Quick summary
a. Saw escalation in events in London:

Seems to have been an organised reaction to a UKIP rally. Battle lines drawn, police as always on the side against the people.
b. New deputy Labour clown, Lucy M. Powell who insulted rape gang survivors. Charming. An Xer called Helen Spirited: “Only 16% of Labour Members bothered to vote. They know it’s all but over for The Labour Party. Can’t wait for Lucy Powell to brag about her “overwhelming mandate”.” Matt Vickers MP: “The same Lucy Powell who smeared those who asked questions about rape gangs as using ‘a dog whistle’.”
c. NYT says Timothy Mellon, a banking heir (is) the anonymous donor who gave $130 million to the U.S. government to help pay troops during the shutdown.
d. DON’T FORGET CLOCKS FALL BACK BETWEEN NOW AND MORNING. Night night all.
17. Steve corner
a. War Room:
b. Anonymous donor:
(1655) Almost evening all. (1748)
The demonstrable truth is the opposite
Below are sshots I gathered earlier and what connects them is the concept of “opposite” in that they don’t just misrepresent, don’t just lie by omission, don’t just flat out lie but they actively say or do the diametric, direct opposite. That’s real Goebbels stuff.
For example, Phillips in parliament stated that Fiona Goddard had lied … which receipts showed was a complete lie in itself. When an MP lies to parliament, that was always grounds for resignation. There was a Yes PM episode where Hacker was tricked into lying to parliament because of faulty advice. Meant nothing, the advice as factor weighed to mitigate … Hacker had inadvertently lied. Resignation stuff.
The barefaced gall today with which this lot get away with it can only be from a firm belief, a hardwired view, that there is no longer any comeback … the cabal WEF, whatever, has sent the message out that it’s a done deal, say whatever you wish now … everything’s now in the melting pot.
Whether or not it is it or can still go awry, they are 100% sure it’s over, they cannot be touched. Someone above has assured the clowns of that.
Just who is the target audience below here? What’s going on? By what means do they think that people, knowing the exact opposite to be true from seeing and hearing it … that people will reverse that which they know? 180 degrees, upside down? Maybe there’s no intention to persuade, maybe it’s just what they’ll write into history, so the next civilisation can dig it up and think it’s history?

Next:

The “opposite” there is that the orthodoxy must have reversed.

That one’s simply bizarre. In a national rag, this child comes out and says the diametric opposite of the truth. No comeback on her.

“Directly contradicted” are the key words above. Not a different nor interpretation … it’s contradiction. Openly. At a high level.

Speaks for itself, that one. This below is still an opposite but in action Pritzker somehow thinks is equal and opposite. He was seated at the big desk and, aping DJT, many people stood around behind the desk as he did the Big Signing of the EO, as if it counts for something. Bizarre.

This last one below is obviously Russian in origin, one of the watchers, the lower item of the two shows a major curiosity in the names … and from where … they obviously have something planned.

The movie with absolutely no Ruth in it.
Review:
“This may be Edgar G. Ulmer’s masterpiece. RUTHLESS is a terrific noir/melodrama – sharply written (by the to-be-blacklisted Alvah Bessie and Gordon Kahn), consistently beautifully photographed (by the underrated Bert Glennon), and truly adventurous in its editing and flash forward-flash backward construction.
Zachary Scott is the “ruthless” title character, but the title is more a cheap shot than anything else; Scott’s Vendig is more an emotionally bankrupt, pathological character than a villain per se. The narrative takes pains to reveal – gradually – the series of events from childhood through adulthood which affected his perverse makeup, making for a fascinating character study.
Subtle revelations and plot twists come about every fifteen minutes, but they’re deliberately ambiguous when they hit the screen, forcing the viewer to pay close attention as the truth of the situation is revealed. This technique alone puts RUTHLESS way ahead of any other Poverty Row melodrama of the period and cements Ulmer’s reputation as a thoughtful stylist.
Louis Hayward plays a sort of Greek chorus, an often acquiescent voice of conscience/best friend/nemesis who keeps the episodic story moving along. Diana Lynn (in two roles), Martha Vickers and Lucille Bremer each give terrific performances as the various women who appear, disappear, and reappear in the lives of both men.
All are sharply drawn, a testament to the determination of Bessie, Kahn and other blacklisted writers to put strong female characters on screen in defiance of the Production Code, which seemed to encourage either submissive or predatory roles for women.
And as if all that isn’t enough, Sidney Greenstreet drops in and sets the screen on fire in every sequence he appears in. A classic coiled spring, his portrayal of a similarly greedy corporate boss is perfectly slimy, and provides a genuine shock when he suddenly grabs Lucille Bremer by the hair and jerks her backwards for a kiss.
Likewise, a later sequence where Bremer drags him in front of the mirror so she can brutally compare him to her new, younger lover is unforgettably painful.”
Been watching her music video reactions for some years … the lady with the strange eyes and laid back manner … just discovered … duh … that she wears glasses.
Anyway, some years back, quite a few American football fan types played a youtube of AFL downunder football … the AFL must have released it in the US … they were all male reactors, so this is a surprise for a girl to be doing a football reaction … this seems to be a new one the AFL has put out:
She asks at the end who’s everyone’s favourite team? Well here’s one contender:
It’s the off season now by the way, their spring.
(1129) Retreated to bed. (1145)
15. Moosh corner
… nice day for it today.

14. Karens

13. Retaining one’s staff

12. Rupert

11. Malaise
