She did very badly in this and in another interview, displaying that she had zero intention of cutting numbers whilst saying she did. Also, interesting cultural exchange … Indian v African, female on female. Loyalty plus, I think not.
6. What’s it say to you?
5. Steve at 955
Four … AA pilots told land at second runway … Trump Says Black Hawk was Flying Above Limit … explanation for crash … Colombian pres … more……
Three … Trump shock and awe … FBI honchos and agents out … CIA too … NIH labs …Greenland purchase … more……
Two … Uke sit-rep … Rubio says unipolar era over … more……
One … Italian Senate bill to leave WHO … Green bill dead … Austrian right follows Germany … tarrifs … last night’s chess game … more….
4. DAD at 956
a. Roland Lescure (former minister) claims that we are far from migratory submersion…..
b. French Leftists Use City Planning To Combat Sexual Crime.…..
c. Trump signed a memo Wednesday to prepare Guantánamo Bay……
d. Jean-Marie Le Pen haunts the left investigation into desecrators of grave…..
I worked on behalf of President Trump’s campaign in 2019, and I’m still one of his most loyal supporters. I would literally take a bullet for him. During 2019, let’s just say I had a gut feeling that Pence was a mistake. I know this may lose me followers, but I feel the same about Tulsi Gabbard. The most risky and dangerous agency in any country is their spooks. You only need to ask the families of JFK and RFK. The one place the whistleblower laws don’t work is the CIA, so anyone coming forward can be setup and called a traitor. And yes, they can make him appear to be just that! The director of the CIA must have ultimate loyalty to the President in order to keep him safe. After reading her background and listening to her stories, I’m worried. I don’t know if Snowden is guilty or not. This is my opinion, and it doesn’t change my support for Trump’s administration or any of his selections.
2. Other middle of the night snippets
1. The Philadelphia air crash
Snippets from Laura Loomer and other pundits:
The plane was headed to Springfield, Missouri. The air ambulance that just crashed in Philadelphia is registered in MEXICO. In America, all aircraft registrations start with the letter N. In Mexico, they start with X. The XA prefix designates the jet as a MEXICAN CIVIL AIRCRAFT … shortly after takeoff from Philadelphia’s Executive Airport (PNE). Authorities are investigating the cause, but witnesses report the jet came down rapidly, almost like a missile … One of the reasons the explosion was so massive is because the plane was carrying larger oxygen cylinders for the patients.
21. The question is how to stop the, ourselves uncarcerated
20. Steve at 955
Colin Rugg:
Tulsi Gabbard unleashes on the deep state, the 51 intelligence officials, Hillary Clinton, and the Democratic Party in her opening statement. One of the best opening statements I’ve seen. “Democrats have accused me of being Trump’s puppet, Putin’s puppet, Assad’s puppet, Modi’s puppet, but what truly unsettles them is I refuse to be their puppet.”
… of our upbringing, to go in hard for our culture. What is Wat Tyler or the Jarrow Crusade to them, whatever homilies come from their lips?
16. Snowdenian advice
15. Brexit, yay!
14. IYE in comments
(Screenshot)
39 years almost to the day since the Challenger crash. Was it one of Them’s sacrif1cial days? 3×13?
Can that heli be operated remotely? Who was on the plane other than the skaters? They’re the main meejah focus by design, imo. The heli came out of L@ngley. The trans pilot is the just another distraction. The extra ‘info’ coming out each day further obfuscates the situation – usual tactic to cause confusion for the normies. Unlikely we’ll ever know what really happened. The speculation is another distraction tactic so what else is going on that they want to keep under the radar? The state of the deep didn’t evaporate on 20/1.
(1015) Brunch time. Ladies at lunchtime around noon. (1059)
13. Men and women
Consider this about us:
Men are certainly a handful, magnetic like-poles who can clash if too close (if proper men I mean), an utter bore when they drop into their male antics … save it, mate, not interested … or manspreading on public transport or mansplaining … all of that … but men are also rocks in a tempest, heavy lifters … it’s safer around guys if they’re of a certain maturity. Proper women know this.
Here’s a young woman below still susceptible to the flattery, still over body conscious, still to mature, imho overly praised by Bannon and Co, dazzled by the face coming up later in ladies at lunchtime. I actually agree she does herself a disservice dressing like that. Put it this way … how would she feel if Steve Bannon war slits in his top on camera to show his chest?
And women do have this temptation to make it about themselves:
Now look … we love Natalie here, her analyses are sharp, just as with Naomi Seibt (also coming up in L@L). I just don’t wish to see a young lady’s mammaries or backside if she’s trying to be taken seriously as a great journo/presenter. I asked the girls once in my university class to dress appropriately.
Right, now Toodles on the fairer sex
If it is a good look it should cross age barriers….well most looks. I do get embarrassed for women who wear young girl things…and really I have seen some wear the look well, but when you see their face and hair … then it is sad. It does not fit. Sometimes it is shocking. 😳
Older women can look good and stylish without being juvenile. Same for older men. Especially revealing or very form fitting things. Also crazy jewelry…and real funky hair! Maybe in the same family look but tamped down…a lot!
Not saying older women cannot dress well or fun…please do MM, Ladies, but not in form fitting leggings and form fitting top to go with it along with very high heels and all that other stuff. Even if the woman is in great shape…it does not work. But really I am sure I am a stick in the mud.
But you know I dress fun and somewhat chic, but hopefully appropriate for my age. Of course around here I dress like a homeless person ( no disrespect to the homeless)! Sometimes running to the post office I might even look like a woman (of a certain maturity)! Frumpy…well not exactly frumpy but on the verge🤭!
12. You might like to take a look at this
UPDATE 1808
Appearing on my X timeline now is a refutation, supposedly by this Jo Ellis … might be, might not … further updates, even change of tack later … this was said earlier:
And these:
You might also like to look at the resume (CV) of this person:
… nope, this was something much nastier, as it involves insanity in the first place. With women, it’s more a case of proving they’re as good as men, with interesting results but in Danica Patrick’s case, she was very good and that was that … a realist and a damn good one too. In Amelia Earhart’s case, it was one step too far, ditto with Amy Johnson … the higher the feminazism quotient, the more self-destructive it becomes.
This Ellis thing is nothing to do with all that, as mentioned … it’s mental illness, plus limited perception.
Add to that the IDE factor in the control tower and there’s a disaster waiting to happen.
(0915) Morning all … looks fairly bleah out there, there were chemtrail planes out yesterday. (0915)
11. Florida Amnesty Bill
10. Naomi Seibt again
9. From yesterday
8. Truth emerges
7. Steve Hilton
”Pete Buttigieg’s FAA got a scathing Inspector General Report in June 2023: – “77% of critical facilities staffed below threshold” – “lacks a plan to address staffing challenges, posing a risk to continuity of air traffic operations” – “FAA cannot ensure it will successfully train enough controllers in the short term” Just like the L.A. wildfires, yet another example of DEADLY incompetence, mismanagement and policy failure from Democrats who are more focused on fringe ideological obsessions than carrying out their basic governing responsibilties. Read the damning report: https://oig.dot.gov/sites/default/files/FAA%20Controller%20Staffing%20and%20Training%20at%20Critical%20Facilities%20Final%20Report-06-21-23.pdf
