The Virginia Giuffre memoir comes out tomorrow
I saw a clip by a girl who was a bit strange, heavily into the candles and being hydrated, cross on a bookshelf behind her, she was saying something huge was going to happen on October 22nd. Uh huh.
Looking at that today, just wondering if it might relate to this memoir. Let’s open with Channel 4, UK, which I never thought I ever would … there ya go:
There are some massive complications with girls and part of it is observers zeroing in on one aspect only. For example, someone said she (VG) was hardly underage, was in it for the money, knew what she was doing. Another pointed out that she was under duress but also had the feelings a female does, all mixed in together.
Another pointed out that VG was abused as a child (seems to be verified). She did not just decide let’s go be a boat girl or island girl. Plus at 14, she was just that … 14.
Then we get that post at the old N.O. called Cry Rape, which showed a clip of a cab driver’s footage of four party girls piling into his cab and the result was a rape charge, once he insisted they pay the fare at the end. The footage told a different story, he was released and nothing whatever happened to them.
There are obnoxious old male bores on TV, esp. in sport, who … er … are actually innocent … and then what seem fine younger men and they are guilty. Social services and plod say these girls are “young whores”. Porn, e.g. Only Fans, features “young whores”. Was that the result of her peers saying there’s great money in simps watching or is it much nastier … trafficking?
It’s not uncomplicated with girls but there are certain rules … stay away from jailbait … unlike this one:
The thing that sticks in my mind is the first report I saw of Prince Andrew’s role. The paper said he’d been shagging an underage girl in London. Then it stated the girl’s age – 16 or 17, I can’t remember which. Which meant, of course, that she wasn’t underage.
How much of the reporting is at a similar level of inaccuracy? I don’t suggest that sucking up to Epstein after his conviction, and lying about it, is wise and statesmanlike. Quite the contrary. I’m glad the oaf has had his titles withdrawn. But, I repeat, how much of the reporting is accurate, how much inaccurate, how much speculation, how much mere fiction?
P.S. Why have we not yet heard who murdered Epstein? Does the silence imply it was Dems wot dunnit? Or Mossad? Or …
……
JH: These things are sent to try us, DM.