(0259)(0509)

 

2. DAD at 994

A day in France; lets start with knives.

According to Vosges Matin, during recess this Tuesday morning, a 9-year-old student allegedly threatened four of his classmates with a pocket knife…..

Progression to choppers and iron bars…..

Then guns…..

1. It’s all in the language

First look at the language here in the Wall Street Apes Xpost:

Kash Patel CONFIRMS Judge Juan Merchan should have never been assigned to Donald Trump’s case Kash Patel:

“I’m calling for the subpoenas to be issued to Judge Merchant’s Daughter’s company who made $15+ million dollars from the illicit information pouring out of her father’s courtroom – I wanna know the bank records because money doesn’t lie – I wanna know how deep it is and how much of it went to the family and how much of it is going to the family after this false conviction.

Then we need to investigate the FEC actual violations that this judge and his family conducted Judge Juan Merchan should never have been overseeing this trial to begin with because of the illicit campaign money that was flowing through there and the unconstitutional due process violations are only the beginning.“

That’s not all, here’s more reasons why he should have NEVER been assigned Donald Trump’s case from The Older Millennial: ‘For these type of cases, the way it’s supposed to work is that there is a panel of 24 judges, and they are all put in rotation and randomly assigned these types of cases. Judge Merchan is not on that panel.

That’s because he’s not a judge. He’s an acting judge. The only way he could have caught this case was to be specifically assigned to it. There was no chance of him being randomly selected. The wild thing is that according to the left and the department of justice, judge Merchan was not only randomly selected to be the judge in this trial, but he was also randomly selected to be the judge in the Trump Organization case, and he was randomly selected to be the judge in the Steve Bannon case.

So judge Merchan, a judge that is not in the pool of 24 judges that is supposed to catch these cases, a judge that is not an actual judge, but an acting judge caught all 3 Trump related cases randomly. This is a judge who gives heavily to an organization very plainly named Stop Trump, and a judge whose daughter makes tens of millions of dollars every year promoting Democrats.’ Insane corruption.

Tough language of course, but carefully worded. Look carefully at Kash’s language again:”I’m calling for …”

Yes, we’re “calling for” too.

Now look at Kari Lake’s: “I started the process of terminating …” … different wording, yes? Why?

I’ve been in fact-finding mode at the USAGM, & boy, am I finding a lot of nonsense that the American taxpayer shouldn’t be paying for. Today, I started the process of terminating the agency’s contracts with the Associated Press, Reuters, & the Agence France-Presse. This will save taxpayers about 53 million dollars.

Why the difference in approach? Because Pam Bondi is the boss in the first case, charged with doing nothing except TV appearances, whilst organising stunts such as “Bindergate”, humiliating MAGAs such as Draino. Pam’s response? I don’t care about those people. She’s the bottleneck, the obstacle.

Wake up and smell the coffee, people. One of two things is happening … firstly, she’s a goodi, gathering behind the scenes, preparing for arrests … or secondly, she’s never been meant to prosecute, just holding it over their heads … art of the deal … hold your trump cards back until the right time. Some intelligence greater than Pam’s would be behind that.