(0653)
ddddd
8. Euphemising again
Very difficult explaining to some of our chaps when to openly use deathcult terminology and when to euphemise. I can’t expect our chaps to know every single thing going down, plus if they write it yesterday, who’s to say it has not changed today?
For example … Wills coming out and stating that Malsi is the religion of peace. Yeah?
Yes yes, I know … the sshot had the word in plain and yet I went to DAD’s item and changed it for Malsi … why? Because Wills had said what he had, the net had taken it up, it had gone viral, therefore the Home Office and Censorship Czar were now involved. It’s a day by day thing. /END.
7. Compromised SCOTUS and birthright citizenship tourism
6. Fact v theatre, denomination v denomination
Had a look at two churches last evening … one called Riverside in NYC, with its heavily LG etc., therefore unbiblical … plus Riverway, in Minnesota. Both blue states/districts, so I expected both biblically deviant …
… but actually, I was wrong on Riverway … they certainly ummed and ahhed on their site, going on about how friendly and inclusive they were … their beliefs though were in a clickable pulldown section and even there, they rabbited on. Finally they got to it … those LG etc. were probably not going to find their views aligned with Riverway’s.
In short … Riverway is trad, which I also felt may have been so in this hymn, despite it’s fairly modern arrangement:
They list themselves as non-denominational, which I quite like … over the Easter period, I saw, on X, the Orthodox really badmouthing the Protestant and Catholic, the Catholic badmouthing the others, both calling themselves the One True Church, while the Protestants were off either tradding quietly or LG etcetering loudly, neither much use in bringing the Word, which I sort of thought was the idea of the Easter/Resurrection period.
But even then it does not stop, the division. Look at The Great Schism of1054, at the St Bartholomew’s Day pogrom and so on … Calvin murdering Savanorola, the IRA and Ulstermen. Actually, look at us unherdable cats at Unherdables … differences on everything from the Iran War to the Moon “Landing” … and then extend that to Regorm and Restore, with those on both sides badmouthing each other.
To then simplistically say well just ban all “religion” … really? Is the Dark Nobility’s WEFism, Fabianism, the Illumined call to “abolish religion” … is that not a religion in itself? Scientism? “The Science is settled”? Atheism is just as fanatical as any cult. That’s before even getting onto paganism, wicca, the green shamballa … and so on and so on and so on.
Take this one for example:
In fact, I saw a good case for denominations a few days back. It said we are all unherdable cats, agreeing to varying degrees but differing on a few fundamentals. Why not? It’s more realistic. Politically, it means that party politics with a single platform are just as fascistic and commie as the baddies themselves. Yet unherdable cats can never combine, except under direct threat.
I myself here at UHC, admin or landlord, have all sorts of denominations represented by regulars … therfore what choice do I have but to be “wishy-washy” non-denominational?
There is another way though … steer a middling course and allow shades of views over enough sites, stating where I am on something, whilst categorically rejecting Wokery and Globopsycho narrative … no solution is satisfactory but this latter has at least halfworked until now. That’s before we even get into English v Celt v French v American v Canadian. Phew! /END for now.
