(1121) Elevenses, folks, had another snooze, not sure how many are good to have. All right, had a quick look at DAD’s and IYE’s comments … that’s my attribution, chaps, ok? Right … over on X, I used the same intro each time and ran these five below. Some are repeats from earlier. Continued below 11 to 15 …

 

15. Neutral question as a pundit with “restricted reach” … for what to know these things?

What action could the disempowered ever take to reverse it? Second neutral question … is it better to know … or not to know? 🤔Example 👇🏻

14. Neutral question as a pundit with “restricted reach” … for what to know these things?

What action could the disempowered ever take to reverse it? Second neutral question … is it better to know … or not to know? 🤔Example 👇🏻.

13. Neutral question as a pundit with “restricted reach” … for what to know these things?

What action could the disempowered ever take to reverse it? Second neutral question … is it better to know … or not to know? 🤔Example 👇🏻.

12. Neutral question as a pundit with “restricted reach” … for what to know these things?

What action could the disempowered ever take to reverse it? Second neutral question … is it better to know … or not to know? 🤔Example 👇🏻.

11. Neutral question as a pundit with “restricted reach” … for what to know these things?

What action could the disempowered ever take to reverse it? Second neutral question … is it better to know … or not to know? 🤔Example 👇🏻.

… continued … how far do we delve? For example, how far do we ask about Sandie, Wolf, Liz W, Christianne or Liz C? Are we interested in their antecedents? Or do we roll with what we’ve seen? As I mentioned … this is a neutral question, focussed on our scholastic method itself. (1147)