
(0609) Bleah out there but a good sleep in here, starting late. (0913)
5. And if I’m in trouble over all the foregoing
… then see which watchlists I’m on after this post item:
4. In support of Sandie Peggie
Keep an eye, readers, if you will, on the topics of this first Wednesday post … see how they pan out, if at all. 🍿🍿🍿
Right … firstly, there’s Sandie Peggie herself and the fight between a department and her, which she must win. That bit’s ongoing.
The second issue, for me alone, is that I just retweeted, not Sandie Peggie’s tweet but her daughter’s. In the light of my earlier tweet being flagged as ad cntnt, there now being a watch list with X and govt depts using it … you do see what they’re looking for … pretext. Juss sayin’.
3. For specifically Brit readers
This is the third part of the two I just posted on X concerning western males and jailbait. @womensafety_UK @jessgill03 @officialsammyuk @misspaulalondon. @LeilaniDowding
Please read that first post in two parts, then this. This one is about the Brit-based Women Safety Initiative, which any decent male should be getting behind. And I mean seriously supporting, along with Rupert, for these rape gangs to be smashed and the perps punished properly, for women and girls to be protected from monsters.
Now, their honey used to spearhead the initiative is Jess Gill, appearing on GB News and elsewhere, who appears to be independent of Sammy Woodhouse and friends. Problem with Jess, clearly a nice person, a lovely lass … is that in this specific campaign, flashing her bare pins like a Paula London or Leilani Dowding does not convey the required message of modesty.
In short, Paula and Leilani are of a safe age, plus their mission is different, whereas many of the WSI seem jailbait and imho, their campaign should be straight down the line, with no iffy questions and nothing for men of any ethnicity to slaver over. That’s all.
And here’s what X did straight after it:
And what exactly was that ad-cntnt? It was the text above, from Please read … to That’s all.
2. Steve at 1120
1. A man called Marty from up north
When I finally got into the site just now and saw how the pwords had been changed, realising it was a newish security measure, the first thing up was X and this bearded alpha saying: “Did we just witness the end of DEI advertising? I hope so. I’m sick and tired of commercials that feature a b***k man with …”
… and I’m going to stop there.
Sounded the same as every person from the US to the Antipodes, inc. Britland and it was accompanied by the de rigeur photo of this new star model Sydney in jeans who is being plastered everywhere.
Now, she was precisely the sort of honey featured on our pages here in the old days … blonde haired, coquettish, superyounglooking, …which is where I started to become suspicious. Who are the two worst “western” nations for “human rights” for indigenous normies (us) just now? Well three worst, let’s say? Yep … Canada, Britland, Oz.
There was something in this guy’s beard which said non-Brit … it was more rugged than our lot, it used the word “commercial”. Not Oz because it was too unashamedly alpha male, rugged, earthy. I took a guess at Canadian but even there had it wrong … he was Albertan, maybe a cattle rancher.
Or pretending to be … bear with me. Precisely because he was that, plus the girl looks to have the body of a f***t**n year old, plus precocious, pure jailbait … she was going to get under so many thick western men’s guards … be honest, men … big red flag, don’t run a series of pics of her, Jimbo, as I see a trap … and shirley an Albertan should see the trap too … unless, of course, he’s a plant, a troll, a catfishing profile pic.
And Starmer SS would then have ammunition to storm the citadel … that’s the level of being careful now we have to be. I’m mentioning it to our boys, not so much to our girls … because what you contribute today needs watching through an Ofsted filter … if they wanted to get you … or me … have you just supplied them?
Remember my speaking of using euphemisms? We’ve become slack of late, inc. me … precisely because the net is flooded with exasperated folk just now who’ve had a gutful of it. Plus this Sydney is so precisely constructed (not AI, she’s real but I mean precisely chosen by the psyops boys to target) … that we’re sitting ducks, boys … she’s on the jailbait cusp … and of course fully clothed. And Western SS want us gone … do not forget that, keep your defences up, ok?
(1625) Nearly evening, all.
20. IYE (url in sidebar)
”A few months ago I noticed a new guy being heavily promoted on Youtube named Chase Hughes. Yeah, his name is already a huge red flag, but let’s not stop there. He sells himself as an expert on psyops and he started out in the first weeks by telling you how to spot them and the people pushing them. I had never heard of him, but it looked to me like he was trying to sell himself as some kind of ex-CIA agent (“CIA profiler”) blowing the cover of their own projects, a sort of whistleblower, now coming over to your side.
That of course makes no sense, since why would a CIA agent or any other psyops expert suddenly switch sides at his age (fairly young) and turn on his superiors? Is that what they are trained to do? And if he was going to do that, would he do it on Youtube? Of course not. If he really were turning on his superiors, he would be banned from Youtube, since Youtube is run by those people. He is also promoted by Joe Rogan, Dr. Phil, Forbes, and Vogue. So I knew he was bad news from the start. Oh, and he uses the CIA badge on his website, pretty much outing himself. They would not allow him to use their name and image for promotion if there was no connection.
He actually has a video on how to read people’s faces. Unfortunately I can read his, since I am a different kind of psyops expert—not CIA-trained but a sort of natural. Of course it wasn’t that hard, since I was already on alert from his name and his claim to be a psyops expert. And the fact he was being heavily promoted on Youtube. But I could also read his face: I could tell he was lying from the first second, just from looking at his dead eyes.”
19. Steve at 1120
Hearts of Oak. Incidentally, UHC and HofO are in the middle of a mutual following love-a-thon just now on X. Shhhhh … don’t tell anyone.
18. Southport
17. One older than that
16. Ain’t that the truth
(1410) Afternoon all. Combination of training plus being locked out of HQ by someone changing the pword … I know who, found a way around it. (1454)
15. Yuge in fact
14. True
13. Some people do see it
12. Southport stabbings anniversary
11. They are really trying to push the ordinary Brit beyond endurance
(0832) Cleared up a bit outside … morning all by the way. (0906)
10. Ofcom
… no censorship in the UK, lies Starmer.
9. Lisa Monaco
8. The issue is NOT Reform members as such
… most seem to me good, hardworking people, heads screwed on right. The issue is the gang of three at the top, two who betrayed TBP and one who betrayed UKIP before that.
7. White liberal and black women
… what’s wrong in their brains?
6. Starmer and Elon say there is free speech?
… one of the Women’s Safety Initiative gals:
(0544) Rainy morning. (0716)
5. Does our Beloved Sausage get off on the hatred
… felt by everyone I know, for him, for his cast of clowns?
4. IYE
Juicy bits from TRG inc “Oscars” for the official nosy parkers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-gcfSlCbvQY
3. Hip-hop?
2. There are one or two things in the female line
… happening just now with me … ggl or some aggregator must have picked up on it because they presented this, this morning, in Quora, before we’d even started the day:
“Paul Newman had a long lasting marriage with Joanne Woodward, 50 years. However, according to himself, all through this marriage he carried guilt. The reason was he had been married earlier, had three children, and cheated on her with Joanne.
He was 24 and Jackie Witte was 19 when they met over their shared love of acting. They married in 1949. A manager at the time said that Paul was a good looking kid but on the acting front nothing special. When Jackie became pregnant with a soon to be son, Scott, it looked like Paul would have to enter the family business for a steady career. But the call of the stage was still strong. He enrolled in a class to obtain a master’s degree in theatre where he thought he could at least teach the subject.
He still went up for the odd role and was lucky enough to be accepted. While performing in a minor part he was spotted by an agent where he was told to move to New York and ‘’look me up.’’ Dropping his degree he did just that and luck soon kicked in. By now Jackie had given up her acting ambitions to care for their growing family.
His looks, his growing acting confidence were growing and producers were taking notice. During the run of a play, Picnic, he met Joanne, the female star’s understudy. His growing success meant tensions at home. He liked to spend time with his buddies while Jackie felt trapped at home seeing little of her husband. All the while he was seeing more of Joanne, though no affair had started. In fact, a third child (with Jackie) was conceived.
With the success of his movie, Somebody Up There Likes Me, things came to a head. Realising his love for Joanne he decided to leave Jackie.
Obviously Jackie was devastated, heartbroken and refused to grant a divorce. Paul moved in with Joanne and they became the new hot couple in the media. Jackie realised it was over and granted a divorce. At the time too, Joanne was pregnant with Paul’s child. Paul didn’t like to be reminded of his behaviour.
‘I was probably too immature to make a success of my first marriage. What happened to us during that period is nobody’s business.’ He did, however, confess to one emotion. ‘Guilty as hell’ was how he described himself about his first marriage, adding: ‘And I’ll carry it with me for the rest of my life.’
While Paul and Joanne became cinema darlings Jackie slipped into obscurity. Nothing seems to be known about her following the divorce and it’s reported she died in 1994.”
1. Steve at 1120
(1710) Evening all.
19. On last evening’s girlball
18. Just laffing, quite laffable
17. Ratcheting
16. Not Groundhog Day but Eternal Boomer Day
Publications such as Quora or Wired, MSN, are pure Wokerati but in Quora’s case, there’s the permanent, Groundhog Day type recurring nostalgia they never kick. Mind you, look at me with Sunday jazz, Baroque and 40s/50s movies … and with good reason.
Joni is correct. Dylan, like Joni, was driven to be a star and to do so he forged a persona that was an amalgam of the other famous people he admired including folk singers and poets. He also set out to create an unconventional life for himself by choice, such as working in a carnival as opposed to an insurance office. He has been credibly accused of plagiarizing both lyrics and melodies. Much of what he does was ‘borrowed’ including his style of singing like a hillbilly (not many of them in Minnesota) but he would attribute it to “influences.” Blowing in the Wind is one song in particular that has come under scrutiny. I was in a Mexican Catholic church once where the congregants sang a hymn in Spanish that had the exact same melody as Blowing, a song that others allege was taken from one called No More Auction Block.
I am a great admirer of Joni Mitchell, a genuine original and musical genius, but Joni is also someone who cultivated a mystique and altered her persona with each new record. Joni and Dylan are not alone in this – Bowie, Donovan, Debbie Harry and many others could be expected to change both their wardrobes and appearance as well as their musical style with each new record. One of Dylan’s strangest personas came in the Seventies when he got involved in the Jesus movement and produced the record “Saved” and apparently allowed himself to be baptized in Pat Boone’s swimming pool. Oy. Our music stars are often not just musicians but they are our heroes: people who lead bigger, more interesting and exciting lives than our own. It’s part of what Dylan, Joni and many others have supplied to those of us living more conventional lives.
I’ve enjoyed some of Dylan’s work — the Desire album is one of his most musical, a collaboration with many genuinely talented musicians and it’s listenable. But at the risk of infuriating the people who idolize Dylan let’s be frank about his musicality. His guitar playing is fundamental, he’s a poor singer with an annoying voice and his harmonica playing is atrocious — in some ways this does make him a folkie, not a sophisticated musician. Many of his lyrics succeed because they are left so purposely vague that the listener can read into them what they want. He is not without his contributions but he is one of the most overrated singer/songwriters of all time.
……
Hmmmm, yes as far as it goes, plus he was “constructed” by the same agents who ran Zappa, flower power, The Who etc. … rebellious yoof. To my mind, the sad thing is those who could not move on from it all and I don’t mean into Floyd, ELP, prog … but nor do I mean into Kenny Rogers and the like … actually, I’m not sure what I mean.
I look at purple haired Boomers today welcoming Hamas and ask, “Why?”
And yet … and yet … derivative, essentially meaningless lyrics which are just phrase grabs and desolate emotion? Yes … but it still has something, je ne sais quoi … even that voice is necessary, the voice of the troubadour. Bad harmonica? Maybe. Definitive harmonica it was. Do I like him? Not that much. But he was certainly of that time and place, as the psy-ops forces people knew full well … the cabal.