(0530) Morning all.
Jim Ferguson on X on Fishy Rishi
In 2017, while already a sitting Member of Parliament, Rishi Sunak quietly funneled $500 million of his own personal wealth into Moderna, a little-known biotech firm with no approved products and a speculative mRNA platform.
The investment was made through Theleme Partners, a hedge fund Sunak co-founded — registered in the Cayman Islands, one of the world’s most secretive tax havens.
At that time, the world had never heard of COVID-19.
And yet, Sunak positioned himself to profit from a biotech firm that would — just three years later — become central to the global pandemic response.
Was this simply good fortune?
Or did he know something the rest of us didn’t?
💉 From Private Stake to Public Payoff
When the pandemic arrived in 2020, Sunak was Chancellor of the Exchequer — the man in charge of Britain’s money.
By 2022, he was Prime Minister.
In both roles, Sunak oversaw the UK’s vaccine procurement. And it was in these roles that he personally approved contracts with Moderna — the very company he had poured half a billion dollars into.
But it didn’t stop there.
Sunak awarded two additional taxpayer-funded contracts to Moderna for the construction of domestic vaccine manufacturing sites on UK soil.
Every contract he signed… Every policy he promoted… Every assurance he gave the British public…
…increased the value of Moderna stock — and his own personal fortune.
🧠 The “Blind Trust” Excuse Falls Apart
When pressed about this glaring conflict of interest, Sunak claimed his investments were placed in a “blind trust.”
But the facts make that claim laughable.
- Sunak co-founded Theleme Partners.
- He helped establish the fund’s Cayman Islands structure.
- He was well aware that Moderna contracts would drive up his portfolio’s value.
This wasn’t a passive trust account.
This was a deliberate, concealed financial operation, designed to enrich a man while the nation suffered.
While ordinary Britons were locked down, silenced, injured, or grieving loved ones…
Sunak was getting richer — behind a wall of silence and secrecy.
⚖️ The Leeuwarden Court Case: The First Domino Falls
On 9 July 2025, the eyes of the world turned to a courtroom in Leeuwarden, Netherlands, where an extraordinary case began — one many believe could ignite a second Nuremberg.
The defendants include:
- Albert Bourla (Pfizer CEO)
- Bill Gates
- Klaus Schwab (World Economic Forum)
- Mark Rutte (Former Dutch PM)
They stand accused of crimes against humanity over vaccine-related deaths, injuries, and mass deception.
The plaintiffs? Seven brave families devastated by adverse reactions and unexplained deaths — most notably linked to Batch EM0477, a vaccine lot allegedly tied to a spike in fatalities.
The evidence? Over 140 exhibits, including autopsies, whistleblower reports, and internal communications showing what lawyers describe as a coordinated cover-up.
Shockingly, lead attorney Arno van Kessel was arrested and blindfolded before the hearing — a move widely seen as political intimidation. Despite this, co-counsel Peter Stassen charged ahead, accusing the defendants of negligence, deception, and mass fraud.
This isn’t just a civil case. It’s a seismic legal moment. A line in the sand.
🕵️♂️ Whistleblowers, Cover-Ups, and Global Collusion
The Leeuwarden case is just one crack in the dam.
Around the world, courageous whistleblowers are stepping forward:
- James O’Keefe, the journalist who exposed Pfizer’s gain-of-function admissions on hidden camera.
- Sasha Latypova, a former pharmaceutical executive, who revealed how COVID vaccine contracts were routed through the U.S. Department of Defense, bypassing standard medical oversight.
- Former employees at Johnson & Johnson, who now allege internal pressure to suppress adverse data.
Their testimonies point to a coordinated, multi-national collusion between governments, corporations, and media to suppress truth, stifle dissent, and silence victims.
So again we ask:
Why isn’t Rishi Sunak under investigation?
Why is the former Prime Minister of the UK — who made half a billion dollar investments into Moderna before the pandemic, then steered public money into that same company during the pandemic — not sitting in that courtroom?
❓ Where Is the UK Inquiry?
No public inquiry has summoned Sunak.
No committee has questioned his stake in Moderna.
No legal authority has demanded to know how much he personally profited.
And all the while, British families suffering vaccine injuries are ignored, gaslit, and left without answers.
This is not incompetence.
This is a cover-up.
🛑 This Is Not Just Corruption. It’s Betrayal.
Sunak wasn’t just an official doing his best in a crisis.
He was a beneficiary of the crisis.
He personally profited from the public’s misery — and never disclosed the conflict of interest.
He never recused himself.
He never faced accountability.
And under the UK National Security Act, if any government official works covertly for a foreign interest or financial entity — and that action results in harm to British citizens — it constitutes a criminal act.
So why has Parliament remained silent?
Who is protecting Sunak?
⚖️ It’s Time for Nuremberg 2.0
If civilian courts won’t act, we must call for international justice.
The Leeuwarden trial is the beginning — but it cannot be the end.
Rishi Sunak must face public scrutiny. He must be subpoenaed. He must answer to the nation.
Because this is no longer about COVID-19.
It’s about the weaponization of a global crisis to enrich elites, silence dissent, and suppress democracy.
“Then we must press for a global Nuremberg 2.0 — peaceful, lawful, and unstoppable.”
🇬🇧 Britain and the world deserves the truth. ⚖️ The victims deserve justice. 🧨 And Rishi Sunak must answer to the country he was sworn to serve.
(i) Usually allegations about Rishi’s extreme wealth have proved to be false – they have treated his wife’s money as his own. Could this be an exception?
(ii) The “Blind Trust”: aha! Joe Bloggs might assume that the phrase implies a trust fund where the trustees decide on the investments and the settler of the money is kept in ignorance. Wonderful if true. But we learned from Toni Blair’s blind trust adventure that Cherie Blair was instructing the trustees what to invest in. So I now assume that all purported Blind Trusts are fake.
Maybe, just to be sure that Joe Bloggs understands the corruption involved we should refer to them as “Blair Trusts”.