(0530)
A woman spurned?
What’s that old saying about hell and fury?
There’s a companion post to this over at OoL at 7 a.m. on loony ideas which damage society … this below was going to be the post over there but as Ggl Blgr do not allow me any image uploading, it would have been a long and convoluted job. Yep, your humble blogger is censored and shadow-banned all over soc-med and so on and so on … let’s get on with this, here and at Jstack.
It will be a series of screenshots, starting with my first awareness of the plight of girls in Britain. I’d start with today’s parenting by THOT mothers with no father about, then the type of young, female teacher they employ in schools now, then the entire weight of “modern” culture making a mockery of our supposed Christian values of propiety … it’s a societal model in its death throes.
My first memory of moves on behalf of girls was by Jess Gill and others, with the Women’s Safety Initiative:
I lost track of her after awhile but believe she may have been on GB News, one the two Nigel Farage Reform channels, the other being Talk TV … last I saw of her was having a jolly with about eight girls in a hotel somewhere … I believe they paid for food and drinks themselves.
As most observers know, the whitewashing govt “inquiry” (usual protect the guilty bollox) was eventually forced on the perps, it came and went, there was huge pressure on Farage to jump in and take the baton … he wanted nowt to do wi’it, he was busy with trying to have his rival jailed or committed (and still people will vote for them today (go figure) … so Rupert, through either disgust at Yusuf Farage or whatever, ventured with this “restoring” idea, still not a party.
The girls started really pushing him (and I ask why not) and the rape gang inquiry resulted … but with real subversion from interested groups, inc. govt, plus plants placed inside the move forward. Something or someone warned Restore (the party now) against this Donna Rachel:
Now, there are things to note in there:
- Yours truly was a mutual follower of hers up till this post
- She mentions Elon as if she were pro Farage … she wanted money too
- The need to say she’s a Jew?
- The changed profile pic … this shot is the very one attacked by all and sundry yesterday.
What exactly happened? She tweeted yesterday, a supposed raped girls champion, with a clip in which she mocks the 219 page report, dismissing it because they can’t even get the words “county line” right. Whaa?
And in that clip, she’s grinning and laughing … very bad optics. She then took a shot of herself laughing sardonically, and has now made it her profile pic.
The reaction was swift, firstly by Restore ladies of course (it being their issue primarily):
Money? I mentioned it above but there’s also this:
Were I Donna Rachel’s attorney, I’m sure (from my youthful debating days) that I could mount a defence for her so far … that laugh was self-conscious only, in that she’d made an error, the £10K was so she could help the girls “heal” along with her … etc. etc.
Except for this:
Oops. Now, before you jump onto the “wongthink”, it’s a blow up of a segment of the govt doc in fine print.
Meanwhile, word has got out overseas about the inquiry … near total silence from the Uniparty MSM, inc. Farage media (GB News plus Talk TV).
Oh … Labour’s role in all this? Are they innocent?
Where does that leave you, me, us on Makerfield Day? Well I’m left with the abused girls who testified at the inquiry, messed up as they are:
I proposed on X yesterday that there be a mobile task force from Restore, able to get into cars quickly and get to any girl (of the inquiry) with a plea for help on X today and tomorrow … obviously it must be mainly trusted females, with maybe a couple of males protecting them.
