Monday [12 till close of play]

(1722) Evening all.

 

17. As night follows day


16. Posie Parker

15. More of the same


14. Communism is the politics of destruction


13. What the hell is Farage up to?

… is he actually trying to lose?


These were Rupert’s actual words on the subject:

Men are men. Women are women. Men are not women. Politicians must stop pretending otherwise. They are not. And they NEVER can be. I thought we got over this utter tripe, but apparently not. Even Farage today seems happy with allowing certain men pretending to be women into a women’s prison.

The answer, is NO. Absolutely bloody not. Stop tolerating it. We don’t need a risk assessment, we don’t need any discussion. If you are a man, you do NOT go into a woman’s prison. End of the story. This utter crap has to end. If that makes me a bigoted dinosaur, then so what. I welcome it. In no sane society would a violent male offender be placed in a women’s prison. In no sane society would a teenage girl be told to share a changing room with a boy. In no sane society would women lose physical sporting competitions to men.

Yet here we are. Still apparently debating what a woman is. Are we a sane society? I honestly don’t know anymore. Britain 2025 is a circus, and sadly the clowns are very much in charge. Let me be absolutely clear: a man cannot become a woman. Ever. There are no exceptions. It’s just a biological fact. Individuals are free to live how they choose, but that freedom ends when it starts to negatively impact others. You can wear a dress, change your hair, have all sorts of surgery and medication – but it does not change biological reality. It just doesn’t. We must restore legal clarity – biological sex must be the foundation for law, policy and safeguarding.

End the placement of men in women’s prisons and spaces – no exceptions. Guarantee women’s sport is for women only. Protect free speech for those who state biological facts without fear. Repeal the Gender Recognition Act. Abolish the idea of a legal gender change. And above all – we must keep this poison away from impressionable children. Any teacher pushing this on young boys and girls must be sacked, and prevented from EVER working with kids again.

Farage and Starmer should have both paid attention in school. Men are men. Women are women. No amount of shrieking will ever change that. Stop tolerating it, and stop eroding decades and decades of women’s rights because it’s fashionable for a bit. We must restore biological reality, and unequivocally protect women- only spaces.

12. Steve corner from 1123

War Room

  • Laura Loomer: “There Is An Obama-Era Intel Agency Coup Against The Trump Administration Taking Place.”
  • Rep. Crane: “This Is Another Non-profit That I Believe Is A Cut-out For The CIA.”
  • Joe Allen: “This Is The First Stage To Get People Completely Dependent On These Technologies
  • Ben Harnwell: rhetorical escalation is the pathway to military escalation — and Ukraine is not worth it

Hearts of Oak

Hearts of Oak: The Week According To . . . David Vance

Monday [11]

(1341) Afternoon all.

 

Welcome return from Steve

He has written on three topics … the laptop, the jeans and this one:

On this one, Steve writes:

“Gone are the days when the English kept quiet about their own replacement’. Societal breakdown is ugly in any area but if it spreads; domino effect takes hold, it could lead to a nationwide collapse. I watched the video DAD linked to the other day, the interview with Professor David Betz, so here’s another more recent one:

The Forge with Harrison Pitt | Ep.12: The Army Is Outgunned | David Betz |” https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FhGb7G44YUA

Best watched over there. Essentially, it’s civil war scenarios and I’ve some things to add. First question is how far Starmer is entrenched in the EU, also who has the literal firepower and level of violence necessary to be the new European Bloc army.


As Redacted pointed out … Roobee has some good things over there (see Scriblerus for access) … yes, Them seem to clearly have the notion that all these invaders become the new army and even if Brits rose up, it would be a Tiananmen Square scenario … cudgels, some weapons, pitchforks, no organisation … plus great passivity now … no one wishes to be the ones to fight … just capture on cellphone and put on socmed, saying how terrible.

Where I think this will become unstuck is among Them themselves, in thrall to shaitan and population destruction and misery, having zero concept that they’re on the list too, taqiyya. Them’s god is money, by which they’ve created the invasion, the invaders are quite liking the almost civilised conditions they find for now, plenty of western girls to rape, almost no opposition from the indigenous in their terms, the currency to sustain them for now.

But the religious imperative is being overlooked here … the point of those weapons stashes in m*sq**s in Them’s eyes is that the subhumans become the new Orcs, the new standing army, while we are the Eloi to be “reduced”.

That’s not the deathcult’s own notion. With its taqiyya … it assures Them that that’s fine but they’ve already spelt out what their policy is … slaughter all who are not themselves … a la Krikkit.

Them know all about this but still look at Iraq etc., no match for smart weapons … the elite are safe enough in their eyes.

So who wins this war? Yes, we Eloi are slaughtered either way but do the deathcult get to the elite first, creating their world caliphate for shaitan … or do Them use the smart weapons and blow up the world first? Interesting question.

Into this comes God or G-d, as per Revelation and other books, in which these days are shortened so that not all life is wiped out before the saved … are. So the second coming occurs, most likely over or just north of Jerusalem.

Other things to factor in, in the short term … China of course, Russia, India. Any scenario of us all waking up and “resisting”?

How? Look at the numbers. Potential “far righters” maybe 30% of the indigenous, poorly educated in the main, no sense of what to do, historically. Those with any sanity and ability maybe 10% of the entire indigenous … obvious targetted by both murderous cults.

Thus, of the indigenous, about 10% with any chance of opposing, another 20% onside but incapable through ignorance, poor education, no oomph either, about 70% normie or Woke, useful fools. Plus look at the total numbers of raping, torturing, gouging, murdering Orcs (see that video again) … far more than the entire west, letalone the 10%.

And there it is.

Monday episode

 

Mandy Rice-Davies again … of course I’d say it! What made the episodes bearable were the femmes and I’m sure neither leading man would have disagreed … they seem to have recycled Susan George, Annette Andre, Suzan Farmer and Catherine Schell, among many.

Monday [4 to 10]

(0900) Bleah out there. Morning. (0917)

 

10. The Figen

9. Inevitable too


8. Israel obviously put their best agent in there


7. Not often I’d back something Dan Hodges would write


6. Longrider with an interesting thought on inevitability

HERE

Also an interesting thought from reader Mark:

“It’s not going against advice, it’s a wilful refusal to be told anything by anybody. Me, me, me! Symptomatic of the infantilization of society.

Well, they will be getting it good and hard and I’m sorry, I really don’t have a shred of sympathy.

Oh, these two narcissists will get out sooner or later (sickening to think what price the mad mullahs will be able to extract) and doubtless (like the above mentioned Iranian born, Iranian – who don’t recognise dual nationality – passport holder) will embark on a “woe is us” tour for sympathy and giggles.

They may well find it a different country to the one they left. I do hope so!”

5. Vox with an interesting thought

HERE

“If you look at ancient history, the rivalries between Athens and Sparta, and between Carthage and Rome, all ended the same way; with the land power eventually defeating the sea power. This is because sea power is intrinsically offensive, which means that it doesn’t have much in the way of defense in depth once its advantages are counteracted in one way or another.”

4. Suppose we’ll have to cover it

Monday [1 to 3]

(0635) Awoke a short time ago, nit mightily by spam, which could be me, could be as a result of my backend, ha ha or could be anything, even WP. No matter. Here’s a bit of doggerel I read on the loo minutes ago:

The rain, it raineth on the just
And also on the unjust fella
But chiefly on the just, because
The unjust steals the just’s umbrella.

  • Lord Bowen (1835-94), in W.Sichel, Sands of time, 1923. There ya go. (0827)

 

3. I ran this on X and shall run it many times, at intervals

This was in a sorority locker room before the “modern” girls demanded it be painted over:


This was a few days ago, on X:


I imagine a typical conversation might go:

Her: Hi!

Me: Hello there. Excuse me … am I addressing a lady, a THOT or one of those Woke feminazis with dyed hair who glues herself to roads? Just to know what I can and cannot say, also … I don’t know where you’ve been.

Her: Do you always address ladies this way?

Me: Ah, thought you might be a lady, forgive me. I’m also well aware that men are some of the worst hypocrites, cheats, demanding impossible criteria in a lady which they would never apply to themselves. Plus many get violent and dismissive, esp. those from certain demographics.

Her: Ah, so we are on the same page after all. (I invite her into the cafe, opening the door, sure there’s enough cash on me.)

(Seated, she opens the banter) Anyway, Mr. James, what should it matter where I’ve been? Do you plan to take my virginity at our first meeting or indeed any time before our courtship and marriage?

Me: Touché.

2. DAD at 1123:2 for Monday and welcome back

a) The following opinion piece illuminates an internecine squabble in the Socialist Party of France. (JH: It relates to the deathcult)…

b) After not receiving any help from the police, French farmers decided to take matters into their own hands to get rid of an illegal gypsy camp that had set up on their land.

c) According to Sud Ouest newspaper, the Saint-Pierre church in Aulnay-de-Saintonge [not far from me], a 13th-century Romanesque jewel, was vandalised on the evening of Friday, August 1, 2025.

d) I found this video, but have not been able to confirm the details. If it is correct, then I predict a division in the Roman Catholic Church in the near future. (JH: I’ve not looked through yet, still loading Monday 1-5, but shall do, though my next stop will be Ann Barnhardt, plus anything on X.

1. Housekeeping

The first thing I saw, after the piece of doggerel, was a note from DAD that he could not get a youtube to expand at 1123:2. That may well have been so on his device, with his provider or sometimes, it can be ours … we are subject to two devices, providers, ancillary functionaries. It only takes one setting in Settings to bgr it up, scuse my French.

Unfortunately for us, the only way is testing variable after carisble, one at a time, to see what “grabs” or not. As it turns out, it’s working here, so might be across Britland, only readers can say.

Second point is my numbering at 1123 … it neglects Andy and DAD’s second … that’s because it is related to DAD 1123:2, rather than a new theme. The second YT url is the same video as the first. So it’s not snubbing in any way, chaps, just a quirk of the numbering system.

Sunday [16 till close of play]

(1710) Evening all.

 

19. Moosh corner


18. Not a safe place to move about now

… soon they’ll be at your door.


17. Eat well in Italy


16. Rolf Norfolk with an interesting post

HERE

“It is an ancient maxim derived from Roman law and Edward I quoted it in 1295: ‘what touches all should be approved by all’ (ut quod omnes tangit ab omnibus approbetur.) So was launched his Model Parliament that invited representatives of the Church, aristocracy and commoners. It was intended to get agreement for taxes to fund the King’s military adventures on the Continent.”:

Sunday [11 to 15]

(1419) Afternoon all … bleah out there. Jazz a bit later, then politics again around 1700. (1445)

 

15. Sirloin


14. Beyond any humane behaviour whatever

… sheer filth.


It’s the last part of Andrew’s which interests me even more … it’s the key to the whole thing … bringing that lot, finally, to account.

13. The state of play in our isles


12. Not sure this one went down all that well with the ladies


11. IYE

… has a certain visage at the link top of sidebar … make sure you’re not having lunch. Plus, he keeps us up to speed on Mercury … keep an eye open for Mercury poisoning.

An episode from tele

 

Why bring you an episode from a series I was never crazy for? Reasons why not below the show … reasons why to post it now though … weeellll, it’s lighter after the heavier material this morning.

Now for the series … what, imho, did not work? Tony Curtis. Alongside Roger Moore.

Curtis was ok in so many shows and films over six decades which required a NY Jewish Hungarian … there were certainly roles for him … but again imho, The Persuaders was not one of those … The List of Adrian Messenger was, for example. Curtis was a boy from the wrong side of the tracks, he did it hard and I can sympathise. While some things were easy enough for me too, there were always certain things in my upbringing which did not sit easily with the genteel, belied by my turn of phrase.

Plus, standing beside Roger Moore, in a British series, more diminutive in many ways, less polished … he chose to overact … plus Lew Grade played up the class differences … maybe not deliberately but it certainly turned out that way … it might seem strange for a fan of Roger Moore but methought Curtis was given a raw deal in this series … there was something slightly de-Grade-ing about what he’d accepted (sorry about that pun). He was too intense for mine as well.

Annette Andre in this episode? A bit wasted. I liked most of the repeat actresses in The Saint but in this episode … hmmmm. Just an opinion, mind.

Now, one more thing … filmmakers’ ideas, in the 60s, of “hip” music which the “groovy” set were dancing to … aaaggghhhh! A good word for it is “naff”. Truly naff and Moore and Curtis both “dancing”, gyrating, at the end with Annette Andre … I’m close to saying sickening … at a minimum ludicrous … I switched off. Even the denouement just before it was not wonderful.

But John Barry’s not getting off the hook that easily. To my mind, his scores in the Bond series and others could be excellent, most seemed to agree on that … but in his notion of “hip” young people’s music? Aaaggghhhh again! However … not wishing to wrong John Barry, were he not the actual composer of the incidental music: