(0545) Morning all. Not bad out there. (1102)
10. Moosh corner
9. IYE
All right, I’m at 13m 50s and first thoughts are that I like the presenter, he does make good points. JDV does seem aware of how it looks, she less so. In comments, I quoted one commenter. Hmmmmm … I’d like to back off a little from that now.
EK is at sixes and sevens, she’s just lost the love of her life, the children’s father. Maybe we, the audience, need to cut some slack here. Also, it being so public, I’ve experience of how sometimes the gals don’t always know limits. Far more dangerous is if the man doesn’t. It’s a live dynamic.
That’s as far as I can go at this point without seeing the rest.
18m 00s … absolutely, sir, absolutely. Confirmation bias, as in my comment to IYE (which I’ll leave up) is a huge danger to judgement and as another Holmes this afternoon shows, it’s critical to decision.
21m 36s … nothing malicious, she’s repeating what her mind has been processing. If I had not had my past with females in the workplace and outside, as a matter of day to day, week to week course, I’d interpret this analyst as defending … he’s simply observing, as he says. Erika (notice the change in me too here) is effusive, she’s not a cold calculator in the sense that she can suppress bubbling emotion.
Leave the question of appropriate or inappropriate for now.
28m 25s … we’re onto the two separate faiths of JD and Usha. He’s doing what I see so many “cultural Christians” doing now … moving closer to faith in it being a real thing (just look at world events), while she is orthodox Hindu … there are certainly issues there. Now it gets tricky for me, quite tricky. (Cough)
In my former place, I had both Russian and Bolgar/Hun gfs and there were common traits in all those of one origin, different ones in the other. I can say that each felt quite different in the arms. The Russian was more Erika, let me say, no barriers. The other was very much how it would fit in with the family etc. One could say the Russian was far more western. Ok, I need to press play again.
Done … excellent video. Again I’m going to be on tricky ground here. EK in his arms is quite different to UV … EK is far more natural in the arms. That being said, he chose to marry UV but there are differences. Some differences are “overcomable”, some are not. It’s not my place to comment further on that.
Is CK dead? I’m no stranger to left field but am thinking yes, he’s the other side of the Styx. Can EK run the show as CK did? No. Will UV stick with JD? I’m thinking yes, as both are heading upwards. That’s about it really.
Tight leather trousers? She made an error imho … why did no one warn her?
Your opinion welcome.
8. And straight away, here it is again
… only this time perpetrated on a human, a young, female human:
7. Coming back to the broader meaning of the ostrich slaughter
… a post in five parts at X.
(i) The very first concession on my part is that yes, I eat meat, yes, I’ve fished and put the knife in above its eyes where they say we should in order to stop the throes and yes, these are animals, the ostriches, not little children in the Sudan or in Nigeria, not young girls in western countries at the hands of the savages, not Ukrainian boys at the hands of Zelensky’s thugs.
There’s such a thing as virtue signalling about being more humane in my slaughter than all these savages are in theirs … does that count in any divine, universal way?
Well, there’s an argument which says yes, there are things which stop us roaming the streets with knives, murdering white boys at random, old people, raping, striking out in fury, acting like Alex and the droogs in The Clockwork Orange. There’s also an argument which mocks that and derides … oh such niceties over whether we kill “lovingly” or not.
This argument says we stun, we don’t drain its blood upside down, we hang or shoot rather than hang, draw and quarter. There’s also an argument which says that savagery like that latter does tend to come down from above.
(ii) There’s an argument that the way those ostriches were clumsily dispatched was way beyond humane considerations … that this was “show barbarism” to illustrate to the plebs what’s coming to them too if they inconvenience Ottawa and Carney’s bosses.
(iii) There were multiple reports that she and others were mocking the killing in front of the owners and others who were distraught … that is, they went over and above. There’s also an argument that there are none so cruel as a conscienceless child … and young women given powers they should not have are just that … conscienceless Woke left.
(iv) This had all the hallmarks of tools of the state having suddenly given licence to be as savage and unfeeling as they could make it … to turn it into a corralled bloodbath. Just as in 30s Germany. To that 100 year old veteran two days ago, to us brought up as we were with that moral code more or less, give or take … in which MPs resigned for lying … think you know where this is going.
Now I’ll go “left field”, a stupid term as there’s nothing Woke left about it in the least … into the realm of that link yesterday at Friday 11, which took an esoteric look at just exactly who the deep state is, its core nature, its cruel, paedo consciencelessness … in short, its core barbarity and savagery. Which is why it so easily aligns with, allies with, savage deathcults, adopts their ways.
What sort of minds produce Podestas and Abramoviches? Allow me to introduce another word and its derivations here … “fiend”, ‘fiendish’, “demonic”. Oh what a sick joke that 80% of young women elected that grinning monster in NYC, in reaction to the “barbarity” of us “far righters”. Think on’t awhile.
6. Over at OoL
https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2025/11/poppies-and-related-matters.html
(Andy mentions Longrider)
