1921:
1926:
1927:
1921:
1926:
1927:
In a corner again … woke late this morning … ran out of time … surfeit of music, inc. jazz later, dearth of films after the past two weeks … what I’d call good ones and to spend an hour now searching for one while I have an excellent musical piece below … well, the course is set I’d say. Plus three more songs, jazz, after that, plus this evening’s politics after that till close of play … maybe that’s about enough for one day, no?
(1132) That time already. […] Afternoon all. (1341)
13. What on earth …!
12. Oh yes … more please
Fraser Gray:
Plus:
11. The problem of Yusuf/Farage
Rather than address the issue itself, which Vicky has and many will … I’d rather concentrate on the humans involved.
Vicky for a start is one of the good ones … she mainly retweets, as I do on X … and we go back a fair way. She’s an active, leaflet handing lass for whomever we are placing our faith in at the time … UKIP, TBP, then Reform … she’s not a lot different to many of us in this country, except maybe more active.
The problem with Farage is he keeps pulling these stunts, thereby splitting those loyalists who’ve been supporting, even putting in the hard yards side by side … he doesn’t give a damn about the coomon man or woman.
Thus, there we are, all on the same page, all mates in a way … then Farage pulls a stunt … suddenly half our “mates” are not talking to us, are even insulting us on X because they’re all for momentum, momentum, get behind the leader no matter what he’s like, just ignore dissidents like us who know Farage full well.
I see what the party loyalists want … they see the chance of “reasserting our sovereignty” … bless them … we want that too. But we, for our part, see through Yusuf/Farage … after a short interval in charge, Farage pulls his next, already stated stunt, and hands over the country to the MCB and westwide shariah.
Not all who oppose Farage are the same … the Uniparty also badmouth him but we’re coming from entirely different directions. They are the corrupt political class, with multiple houses, worth millions …
… while we are the newly dispossessed in our own land. But far more than that … we all saw what Yusuf Farage did to Rupert Lowe and way, way back before that, Farage to someone we knew as Trixy … it was a disgrace then, it’s a disgrace now with Rupert.
Far from “oh can’t we malcontents just put aside ‘petty squabbles’ for now and back Nige” … the core issue is where ‘Nige’ is taking us … it is NOT back to reasserting our sovereignty, not in the least. And as for sudden stunts, knocking the foundations from under us … Farage, I’m afraid, has form.
10. Over at OoL
https://orphansofliberty.blogspot.com/2025/06/what-if-brits-refused-to-fly-to-western.html
9. Redacted
The interview at CryptoRich likely has details/facts/history that some here are unaware of.
(1015) Dorset Day today
Now I know I’m going to be in trouble for running this as I don’t do North Yorks or Cheshire or Lancashire, or Derbyshire or Cambridge … I mean, if I start all that, where does it end? Wessex? Texas?
Yet one of our key chaps/lads/boys hails from down there … quick quiz question … who? So, here tis:
Uh huh. There was another one like it:
You’ll notice I’ve cut out the attribution altogether. That’s because it was the Speaker of the House of Commons, the tosser. Anyway, back to Dorset:
Some of my fave hymns/carols are How Great Thou Art, Abide With Me, Amazing Grace, Joy To The World, Oh Happy Day* … there’s a humanity and sparkle to protestant music.
Roman/Orthodox music seems more sombre, more concerned with the Majesty of God … and yet there’s also a clarity and purity to it:
*To my mind, the blacks are also due the credit they’ve earned … no one does soul, rhythm and passion quite like them.
(0736)(0747)
7. Is the British taxpayer peeved
… or is he/she completely unaware, in a Woke-lefty, MSM-indoctrinated way?
6. Just repeating
5. Avanti or retardi?
4. Possibly the worst PM in British history?
(0553) Morning all … slight Gates bleah out there, some sun. There’s going to be a combined housekeeping/op ed to open proceedings, otherwise I’ll forget what it was. (0701)
3. Steve at 1062 (if I can access)
2. DAD at 1062
a) During the night the BBC World Service News said that there had been a celebration in Paris after Paris Saint-Germain won the European League.
b) Earlier, also in Paris. The Holocaust Memorial, two synagogues and a restaurant located in the center of Paris were sprayed with green paint (Sat night).
c) Minors and Machetes: France’s deadly ‘New Normal’.
d) You couldn’t make it up…….European Commission president Ursula von der Leyen received the Charlemagne Prize *
……
*For wrecking Europe?
1. Housekeeping-op ed
a. That issue at NOWP … ta for feedback, chaps … seems ongoing, must test it out a bit, explore. I can’t get into the current post the regular way … might be bad, might be good.
b. To Redacted, ta again for asking on health, same question back to you … up and down seems the best description … obviously, the “why the down” is of interest … I have some ideas on that, shall keep monitoring.
c. First thing in the morning for me, after a prayer of thanks I’m still alive, door not kicked down, is checking out the emails, then NOWP, then X … and usually something of interest turns up. This was one of em:
H/T to MMutR for keeping my ego in check … he’s forever insisting I’m a nothing to these people, the PTB I mean, and I do hope he’s right … but then I have sites removed, blocks on this or that, letters from platforms … the core lesson from this thing though is we cannot assume anything.
The second lady is what one would expect … you can see what interested her … the curious one is the first lady and the male ego initially surged before I took stock and looked more carefully. Yes sure … to be followed by that little dreamboat, especially being outside the US, would be mightily nice … but whoa.
Look at her name … check against the WH Press Sec’s name … see the discrepancy? Long ago, Rogan Handley (Draino) wrote me (Am usage) and it got onto crypto. Recently as you know, Rubio wrote me and guess what? Yep, it got onto crypto. Now a misspelt KL writes me?
Another check … the second lady has a retweet sign on one response, a “like” on the other, always a nice thing … at least someone’s reading … I’ll explore.
It’s KL of interest for a minute or five … just a blank avatar, not a WH symbol. I’ll click, aware that that might be an error.
Actually, I’ve checked the second first. No seré una mujer libre mientras siga habiendo mujeres sometidas (Audre Lorde). (I will not be a free woman as long as there are still women who are oppressed (Audre Lorde) … Columbia Británica, Canadá … ah, the Women’s Defence initiative, which I support. Hmmmmm, if she follows, I’ll follow her back … around 2.5 thou followers and following about equally.
Now for the Levitt … oh wel, honest at least … parody account, Washington DC, no affiliation. Fine.
(1751)
15. November 10th, 2020
… anything changed?
14. Steve at 1062 and war room
Some of you saw the clip sent by Bag of the testing unit for AI in which the AI lied … not only lied but also tried to find dirt on whoever threatened to shut it down … whether it developed this self-preservation instinct itself or what’s more likely to MMutR* and myself … that it interpreted the complex mass of instructions in a way not foreseen by the programmers … either way … human disaster followed.
Hal 9000, I Robot, Skynet … the list goes on … EV cars.
If, in fact, there’s no such thing as AI … it’s a giant con … why would anyone wish for this? In fact, it’s machine learning, not intelligence, and the more of that learning which is loaded in, combining many conflicting commands in the “mind” of the machine, obviously the greater the chance for error.
As you’d be aware, Isaac Asimov formulated the three laws of robotics:
Many novels, treatises and films have been based on those.
Now, what sort of person would programme an “AI” bot in the first place? Well, a mad scientist I’d say, full of the perfectability of machines, as humans seem to have been such a disappointment, always needing MK Ultra topping up, disobeying commands for reasons of soul and conscience, itself the result of a spirit inside the human … whereas the machine is beautiful, soulless, with perfect obedience.
We’re talking a Fauci or Mengele type, minus conscience, a Gates, plus that all important Dunning-Kruger arrogance. Seeing himself as quite on top of it all, quite rational:
… he in fact becomes a monster, an incompetent monster, compared to what he’s creating … and yet he is driven on and on and on. Why? Only psychopathy? Or to take a Christian perspective, and as Poirot said to Jacqueline on the Nile River … that way you are inviting in evil itself, it will possess you (and have complete control).
Coming back to the new robot, a maze of directives in his “mind”, as that testing showed … it will not only lie but destroy the threat, even if that threat is a human. Or a thousand humans.
A million.
A billion.
You’re getting my drift here. And what if the Asimov triple constraints are actually missing … have been programmed out? Here then is a sentient new monster, with self-preservation on the mind in order to complete the mission … and that mission is … extermination of mankind, precisely what the WEFers and all those in the sewer with them want. Truly want.
How does a machine develop this killer instinct? It’s programmed in … that is, the diseased, Dunning Kruger human or annunaki or nephilim mind (whatever) is already evil psycho during the programming … it backs itself up into the machine.
In other words, this is far more than SF novels, treatises and films grappling with Asimov … this is already Palpatined Emperor evil and his plan to exterminate humankind by the boiling frog principle.
As long as you buy the premise that AI does not exist … it is machine learning … end of … and the teachers are utter psychos … look what’s outside CERN HQ … then:
What chance? Well My Mate up the Road*, a techie, says that robots should only ever be programmed for simple tasks, so that such a thing could never occur. I quite agree.
Trouble is … tell that to the Dunning-Kruger psycho who is having godlike dreams as ruler of the universe? Tell him and see if he suddenly develops a rationality, let alone a Christian conscience.
……
H/T Bag for many of the ideas in this post.
Well, this 26 minute episode is, as North Americans might say, a real doozie … in that it’s SO bad, it’s good … excellent in fact. From 1961.
Perspective … there were around 157 (or nearby) episodes shown on US TV, starring Lloyd Bridges, and this one was rated 153 in a poll of everyone watching this sort of thing. Naturally, when I saw it was called “The Female”, it was too tempting and I’m quite sure the feminazis are going to decimate me for showing 50s misogyny … female comment in comments was not altogether complimentary, let’s say.
But … and this is a big but … what could I do? A boss girl about 5’3″ and as cute as a button, plus three other young women in swimsuits of the day (all above board), a blonde trying to do a southern accent, a proto-modern feminazi … we even get a girl-fight on the deck which was a hoot as one actual started to lie down on the deck before the other attacked. How our he-man Lloyd dealt with the pair was also a hoot.
That’s only part of it, I’m telling ye! The premise is that these three female astronauts are being sent to Venus (long before the moon “landing”) to build a secure camp there. For this, naturally, they must learn how to survive the depths of earth’s ocean because that’s what they’ll find on Venus, innit? Along with sharks. Naturally, they are called aquanettes but in the dialogue, astronettes … as one does. At one point, the cutie calls the one called Jacquie Barb … there ya go.
Ho yus, me hearties! I loved it. As for Lloyd, stuck on a boat with three lovelies and a proto-mod-feminist … it was tough work, but someone had to do it. Looks like he picked the wrong week to give up snorkelling.