(1201) Afternoon all … still quite a backlog to clear or alternatively … quite a few interesting items coming up. Some baroque will follow that, while searching around for a good film. (1410)
19. On that primary head cancelling Easter

18. While Donny appoints Big Pharma to the top job

17. What’s in a name?

16. IYE with Miles
“The first is a story out of Ukraine, where the Defense Ministry is recruiting new soldiers with promises of thousands ofMcDonald’s cheeseburgers. I am absolutely not making that up. This war has now gone so transparently fake they figure why not just insert a McDonald’s ad right into the middle of it. I guess next they will appoint Mayor McCheese as the new President to replace Zelensky.”
JH: Scrolled down but could not find the word “second” for the other story.
15. Coming back to the Susan Wiles thing again

What on earth is going on with Donny? Ok, he fell for the Fauci Birx Pence Brock shtick (PEPFAR) and you can see how they spun it to him because he went all Warp Speed, without once exploring it himself. And the same’s happening here with Gatekeeper Wiles … this woman is looking to be bad news, not unlike Pammy.
A large percentage voting Trump were not just MAGA but also MAHA … and here he is doing dirt on RFK Jnr in the worst way possible. What the heck? I’m not personally a food fanatic but I sure am political and Donny has done great damage by this appointment, in the same way Farage has in Britain.
I’m hoping it’s inadvertent, that he has so much to deal with just now. He was obviously never interested in the health issue and so he was easily duped … can he wake up to Wiles?
14. On one of Steve’s in item 2 today
“California GOP Delegate Says Populists Still Outnumbered in Party Leadership Despite Growing Support — “60% of Our Delegates Are Basically RINOs””
That question applies to us too … what are the real numbers for the UK? Is it 52% good people or is it 30% or so, which was UKIP’s victory in the Euros, brfore Nigel went mental or gave his longterm game away? What about the near 80% who did not vote for Starmer in the GE?
How do the numbers really fall?
Enemy globopsycho, e.g. Mark Elias, Gates, Soros, old families behind them … what … 2% of western populations?
Then pollies, the compromised, from maniacs like Starmer and Obama to fanatics like Rice over there … any Labour pollie, much of the Tory voter class, all Lib Dem, Greens, many Reform, esp. the gang of five (with Oakeshott) … 5% of the population?
Then deluded MSM, judiciary, medicos, acting class, education, church, karens … useful idiots, plus all those paid to go to Hamas rallies, key cars etc. … what … 45%? They contain those though who, on a given issue, e.g. Southport, forget to support the demonic.
Now to good people … some within the Tory voters, maybe 10% of the pop? A few good Labour voters actually caring for their land? Who knows?
Then the dissenters but many comprise low info thinkers … e.g. those still thinking Farage is not uniparty, so subtracting those from the good (that can change once they finally wake up though, e.g. grassroots Reform) … maybe the hi info dissenters, e.g. on X, are what … 10% of the voting pop?
Then the “just not interested in politics peeps”, e.g. nature people, old England etc. … good people, fine people, but politically unaware and don’t wish to know … who knows what %? But if they vote Uniparty, they are supporting wrongdoing. Includes the politically bewildered.
Then the deathcult invaders … 30% of the country yet? 20%? Jewish troublemakers, Chinese etc.? 3%?
So, reducing this to those supporting policies for their country to thrive? 15% would you say, all up? The other 85% blindly supporting evil, wrong, greed to varying degrees, mostly not knowing they are? I simply don’t know the real numbers on that.
News round up from MM
“You thought we had bottomed out?”
https://mileswmathis.com/gas.pdf
Clown World indeed.
Au revoir.
16. “JH: Scrolled down but could not find the word “second” for the other story.”
Then you didn’t scroll down far enough.
……
JH: Went down through it again … no “second”. There was a reference to gaslighting though and I saw “gas” in the url. Not sure it was about DiCaprio and Woods … that was interesting.
He doesn’t make it easy, Miles.
Not well laid out this one. He touched on a few current news stories but didn’t number them. Starting with “first” gave the reader a certain expectation. A few large gaps for some reason – might have been due to his insertion of photos, idk.
……
JH: All good.